Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,888 questions · 2,009 findings · 352 reviews

No studies found 224 · 11.1%GRADE not reported 265 · 13.2%Very low 551 · 27.4%Low 540 · 26.9%Moderate 311 · 15.5%High 118 · 5.9%

Capecitabine‐containing regimens vs non‐capecitabine‐containing regimens or no chemotherapy

DFS: hormone receptor‐negativemedian · patients with early breast cancer

Capecitabine‐containing regimens probably leads to lower DFS: hormone receptor‐negativemedian compared with non‐capecitabine‐containing regimens or no chemotherapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Capecitabine‐containing regimens vs non‐capecitabine‐containing regimens or no chemotherapy

Overall survival: Median length of · patients with early breast cancer

Capecitabine‐containing regimens probably leads to lower overall survival (OS)median compared with non‐capecitabine‐containing regimens or no chemotherapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Capecitabine‐containing regimens vs non‐capecitabine‐containing regimens or no chemotherapy

Febrile neutropenia · patients with early breast cancer

Capecitabine‐containing regimens probably leads to lower febrile neutropenia compared with non‐capecitabine‐containing regimens or no chemotherapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Capecitabine‐containing regimens vs non‐capecitabine‐containing regimens or no chemotherapy

Diarrhoea · patients with early breast cancer

Capecitabine‐containing regimens probably leads to higher diarrhoea compared with non‐capecitabine‐containing regimens or no chemotherapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Capecitabine‐containing regimens vs non‐capecitabine‐containing regimens or no chemotherapy

Hand‐foot syndrome · patients with early breast cancer

Capecitabine‐containing regimens probably leads to higher hand‐foot syndrome compared with non‐capecitabine‐containing regimens or no chemotherapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Visual classification: ERK (Ekstrand-Ricketts-Kidd system) vs Reference standard (histology, excavation, radiographs/microCT, or tooth separation)

Specificity for detection of enamel caries · Asymptomatic children, adolescents, or adults presenting for clinical examination (in vivo studies), or extracted teeth of children or…
1 finding from 1 review

Visual or visual-tactile classification systems (any system: ICDAS, ERK, Nyvad, Downer, Lussi, UniViSS, or unspecified) vs Reference standard (histology, excavation, radiographs/microCT, or tooth separation)

Diagnostic accuracy on surfaces with pit and fissure sealants · Asymptomatic children, adolescents, or adults presenting for clinical examination (in vivo studies), or extracted teeth of children or…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Visual classification: ERK (Ekstrand-Ricketts-Kidd system) vs Reference standard (histology, excavation, radiographs/microCT, or tooth separation)

Sensitivity for detection of enamel caries · Asymptomatic children, adolescents, or adults presenting for clinical examination (in vivo studies), or extracted teeth of children or…
1 finding from 1 review

Tafamidis vs placebo

Number of participants experiencing at least one severe adverse event · people with early‐stage TTR‐FAP

It is very uncertain whether tafamidis changes number of participants experiencing at least one severe adverse event compared with placebo (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review