Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4,736 questions · 15,265 findings · 1,163 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 3,871 · 25.4%GRADE not reported 810 · 5.3%Very low 4,242 · 27.8%Low 3,879 · 25.4%Moderate 1,999 · 13.1%High 464 · 3%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Intervention not reported

Cost of intervention per month · children and adolescents with acute graft‐versus‐host disease after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

1 finding from 1 review

Extracorporeal photopheresis versus standard treatment for acute graft‐versus‐host disease after haematopoietic stem… 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Intervention not reported

Cost of intervention per month · children and adolescents with chronic graft‐versus‐host disease after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

1 finding from 1 review

Extracorporeal photopheresis versus alternative treatment for chronic graft‐versus‐host disease after haematopoietic… 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Binocular iPad treatment vs occlusion therapy

Participant adherence to intervention · 5‐ to 8‐year‐old children with amblyopia

1 finding from 1 review

Binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children aged three to eight years 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 63 participants
Moderate

Binocular iPad treatment vs occlusion therapy

Measurable change in stereopsis after 8 (± 2) weeks and 16 (± 2) weeks of intervention 'Real change' in stereopsis is defined as a change in stereoacuity of two or more octaves. · 5‐ to 8‐year‐old children with amblyopia

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children aged three to eight years 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Child protection training for professionals to improve reporting of child abuse and neglect vs no training, waitlist control, or alternative training not related to child abuse and neglect (primary outcomes)

Number of reported cases of child abuse and neglect (professionals' self‐report, actual cases) Time of outcome assessment: short term (3 months postintervention) · postqualified professionals, including elementary and high school teachers, childcare professionals, medical practitioners, nurses, and…

1 finding from 1 review

Child protection training for professionals to improve reporting of child abuse and neglect 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 42 participants
Very low

Child protection training for professionals to improve reporting of child abuse and neglect vs no training, waitlist control, or alternative training not related to child abuse and neglect (primary outcomes)

Attitudes toward the duty to report child abuse and neglect Measured by: professionals’ self‐reported attitudes towards the duty to report child abuse and neglect Time of outcome assessment: short term (postintervention) · postqualified professionals, including elementary and high school teachers, childcare professionals, medical practitioners, nurses, and…

1 finding from 1 review

Child protection training for professionals to improve reporting of child abuse and neglect 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 741 participants
Very low

Child protection training for professionals to improve reporting of child abuse and neglect vs no training, waitlist control, or alternative training not related to child abuse and neglect (primary outcomes)

Number of reported cases of child abuse and neglect (professionals' self‐report, hypothetical vignette cases) Time of outcome assessment: short term (postintervention) · postqualified professionals, including elementary and high school teachers, childcare professionals, medical practitioners, nurses, and…

1 finding from 1 review

Child protection training for professionals to improve reporting of child abuse and neglect 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 87 participants
Very low

Child protection training for professionals to improve reporting of child abuse and neglect vs no training, waitlist control, or alternative training not related to child abuse and neglect (primary outcomes)

Knowledge of reporting duty, processes, and procedures Measured by: professionals' self‐reported knowledge of jurisdictional or institutional reporting duties, or both Time of outcome assessment: short term (postintervention) · postqualified professionals, including elementary and high school teachers, childcare professionals, medical practitioners, nurses, and…

1 finding from 1 review

Child protection training for professionals to improve reporting of child abuse and neglect 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 744 participants
Low

Child protection training for professionals to improve reporting of child abuse and neglect vs no training, waitlist control, or alternative training not related to child abuse and neglect (primary outcomes)

Knowledge of core concepts in child abuse and neglect (all forms) Measured by: professionals' self‐reported knowledge of all forms of child abuse and neglect (general measure) Time of outcome assessment: short term (postintervention) · postqualified professionals, including elementary and high school teachers, childcare professionals, medical practitioners, nurses, and…

1 finding from 1 review

Child protection training for professionals to improve reporting of child abuse and neglect 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 154 participants
Very low

Child protection training for professionals to improve reporting of child abuse and neglect vs no training, waitlist control, or alternative training not related to child abuse and neglect (primary outcomes)

Knowledge of core concepts in child abuse and neglect (child sexual abuse only) Measured by: professionals' self‐reported knowledge of child sexual abuse (specific measure) Time of outcome assessment: short term (postintervention) · postqualified professionals, including elementary and high school teachers, childcare professionals, medical practitioners, nurses, and…

1 finding from 1 review

Child protection training for professionals to improve reporting of child abuse and neglect 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 238 participants
Very low

Summary of findings table ‐ Preoperative exercise training vs no exercise

Safety of the intervention (adverse effects) · people scheduled to undergo lung resection for non‐small cell lung cancer

1 finding from 1 review

Preoperative exercise training for people with non‐small cell lung cancer 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 188 participants
Moderate

Summary of findings table ‐ Preoperative exercise training vs no exercise

Exercise capacity · people scheduled to undergo lung resection for non‐small cell lung cancer

2 findings from 1 review

Preoperative exercise training for people with non‐small cell lung cancer 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 191 participants
Moderate
Preoperative exercise training for people with non‐small cell lung cancer 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
6 studies · 474 participants
Very low

Summary of findings table ‐ Preoperative exercise training vs no exercise

FEV1 · people scheduled to undergo lung resection for non‐small cell lung cancer

1 finding from 1 review

Preoperative exercise training for people with non‐small cell lung cancer 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 197 participants
Low

Combined steroid and antibiotic therapy vs antibiotics alone

Costs · eyes with acute endophthalmitis following an intraocular procedure (e.g. surgery, intravitreous injection)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Adjunctive steroid therapy versus antibiotics alone for acute endophthalmitis after intraocular procedure 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Dynamic splinting vs delayed or no splinting

Surgical intervention · babies under six months of age with all severities of DDH

1 finding from 1 review

Splinting for the non‐operative management of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in children under six months of… 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low

Dynamic splinting vs static splinting

Surgical intervention · babies under six months of age with stable and unstable hips

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Splinting for the non‐operative management of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in children under six months of… 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Adaptive servo ventilation (ASV) vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)

Time to life‐saving cardiovascular intervention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation for central sleep apnoea in adults 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation for central sleep apnoea in adults 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Adaptive servo ventilation (ASV) vs bilevel ventilation

Time to life‐saving cardiovascular intervention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation for central sleep apnoea in adults 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation for central sleep apnoea in adults 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Adaptive servo ventilation (ASV) plus best supportive care vs best supportive care alone or inactive control

Time to life‐saving cardiovascular intervention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation for central sleep apnoea in adults 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) plus best supportive care vs best supportive care

Time to life‐saving cardiovascular intervention

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) plus best supportive care may leads to lower time to life‐saving cardiovascular intervention ( compared with best supportive care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation for central sleep apnoea in adults 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Low