Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

3,601 questions in 252 reviews · Pregnancy and Childbirth

current versions
No studies 726 · 20.2%Ungraded 421 · 11.7%Very low 828 · 23%Low 993 · 27.6%Moderate 486 · 13.5%High 147 · 4.1%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) (ST analysis) plus cardiotocography (CTG) vs CTG alone
Neonatal encephalopathy ‐ ST analysis · Pregnant women (and their fetuses) in labour, with a perceived need for continuous electronic fetal heart rate…
Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.61 [0.3, 1.22]6 studies · 26410 participantsHigh
Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) (ST analysis) plus cardiotocography (CTG) vs CTG alone
Fetal blood sampling ‐ ST analysis · Pregnant women (and their fetuses) in labour, with a perceived need for continuous electronic fetal heart rate…
Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.61 [0.41, 0.91]4 studies · 9671 participantsHigh
Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) (ST analysis) plus cardiotocography (CTG) vs CTG alone
Operative vaginal delivery ‐ ST analysis · Pregnant women (and their fetuses) in labour, with a perceived need for continuous electronic fetal heart rate…
Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.92 [0.86, 0.99]6 studies · 26446 participantsHigh
Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) (ST analysis) plus cardiotocography (CTG) vs CTG alone
Admission to neonatal special care unit ‐ ST analysis · Pregnant women (and their fetuses) in labour, with a perceived need for continuous electronic fetal heart rate…
Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.96 [0.89, 1.04]6 studies · 26410 participantsHigh
Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) (ST analysis) plus cardiotocography (CTG) vs CTG alone
Perinatal death ‐ ST analysis · Pregnant women (and their fetuses) in labour, with a perceived need for continuous electronic fetal heart rate…
Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.71 [0.67, 4.33]6 studies · 26446 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Perinatal/neonatal death or severe neonatal morbidity ‐ Low national perinatal mortality rate · women with term breech delivery
Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.07 [0.02, 0.29]1 study · 1025 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Perinatal/neonatal death or severe neonatal morbidity ‐ High national perinatal mortality rate · women with term breech delivery
Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.66 [0.35, 1.24]1 study · 1053 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Birth trauma, as defined by trial authors · women with term breech delivery
Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.42 [0.16, 1.1]1 study · 2062 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Death or neurodevelopmental delay at age 2 years · women with term breech delivery
Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.09 [0.52, 2.3]1 study · 920 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Caesarean section · women with term breech delivery
Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery (2015) · Cochrane
RR 2.04 [1.91, 2.17]3 studies · 2396 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Short‐term maternal morbidity · women with term breech delivery
Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.29 [1.03, 1.61]3 studies · 2396 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Any pain after at 3 months · women with term breech delivery
Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.09 [0.93, 1.29]1 study · 1593 participantsLow
Pyridoxine (B6) vs control
Eclampsia ‐ Antenatal oral pyridoxine versus control · pregnant women, either during the prenatal period or during labour.
Pyridoxine (vitamin B6) supplementation during pregnancy or labour for maternal and neonatal outcomes (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 1242 participantsUngraded
Pyridoxine (B6) vs control
Pre‐eclampsia ‐ Antenatal oral pyridoxine versus control · pregnant women, either during the prenatal period or during labour.
Pyridoxine (vitamin B6) supplementation during pregnancy or labour for maternal and neonatal outcomes (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.71 [0.85, 3.45]2 studies · 1197 participantsLow
Pyridoxine (B6) vs control
Pre‐eclampsia ‐ Antenatal pyridoxine lozenges versus control · pregnant women, either during the prenatal period or during labour.
Pyridoxine (vitamin B6) supplementation during pregnancy or labour for maternal and neonatal outcomes (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.43 [0.64, 3.22]1 study · 944 participantsLow
Pyridoxine (B6) vs control
Dental decay (increase in decayed, missing or filled teeth) ‐ Antenatal oral pyridoxine versus control · pregnant women, either during the prenatal period or during labour.
Pyridoxine (vitamin B6) supplementation during pregnancy or labour for maternal and neonatal outcomes (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.84 [0.71, 0.98]1 study · 371 participantsLow
Pyridoxine (B6) vs control
Dental decay (increase in decayed, missing or filled teeth) ‐ Antenatal pyridoxine lozenges versus control · pregnant women, either during the prenatal period or during labour.
Pyridoxine (vitamin B6) supplementation during pregnancy or labour for maternal and neonatal outcomes (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.68 [0.56, 0.83]1 study · 342 participantsLow
Pyridoxine (B6) vs control
Preterm birth (before 37 completed weeks of gestation) · pregnant women, either during the prenatal period or during labour.
Pyridoxine (vitamin B6) supplementation during pregnancy or labour for maternal and neonatal outcomes (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 participantsUngraded
Pyridoxine (B6) vs control
Low birthweight · pregnant women, either during the prenatal period or during labour.
Pyridoxine (vitamin B6) supplementation during pregnancy or labour for maternal and neonatal outcomes (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 participantsUngraded
Beta stimulant vs placebo
Cephalic presentation at birth (primary) · patients with breech presentation
Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic… (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.68 [1.14, 2.48]5 studies · 459 participantsLow
Regional analgesia (with tocolysis) vs no intervention of regional analgesia (with or without tocolysis)
Caesarean section (primary) · patients with breech presentation
Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic… (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.74 [0.4, 1.37]3 studies · 279 participantsVery low
Regional analgesia (with tocolysis) vs no intervention of regional analgesia (with or without tocolysis)
Fetal bradycardia (primary) · patients with breech presentation
Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic… (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.48 [0.62, 3.57]2 studies · 210 participantsLow
Regional analgesia (with tocolysis) vs no intervention of regional analgesia (with or without tocolysis)
Failed external cephalic version · patients with breech presentation
Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic… (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.61 [0.43, 0.86]5 studies · 409 participantsModerate
Regional analgesia (with tocolysis) vs no intervention of regional analgesia (with or without tocolysis)
Perinatal morbidity · patients with breech presentation
Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Regional analgesia (with tocolysis) vs no intervention of regional analgesia (with or without tocolysis)
Perinatal mortality · patients with breech presentation
Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Beta stimulant vs placebo
Cephalic vaginal birth not achieved (CS + breech vaginal birth) primary outcome · patients with breech presentation
Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic… (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.75 [0.6, 0.92]4 studies · 399 participantsModerate
Beta stimulant vs placebo
Caesarean section (primary) · patients with breech presentation
Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic… (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.77 [0.67, 0.88]6 studies · 742 participantsModerate
Beta stimulant vs placebo
Fetal bradycardia (primary) · patients with breech presentation
Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic… (2015) · Cochrane
RR 2.81 [0.12, 66.17]1 study · 58 participantsVery low
Beta stimulant vs placebo
Failed external cephalic version · patients with breech presentation
Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic… (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.7 [0.6, 0.82]9 studies · 900 participantsModerate
Beta stimulant vs placebo
Perinatal mortality · patients with breech presentation
Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Beta stimulant vs placebo
Perinatal morbidity · patients with breech presentation
Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Regional analgesia (with tocolysis) vs no intervention of regional analgesia (with or without tocolysis)
Cephalic presentation at birth (primary) · patients with breech presentation
Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic… (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.63 [0.75, 3.53]3 studies · 279 participantsVery low
Regional analgesia (with tocolysis) vs no intervention of regional analgesia (with or without tocolysis)
Cephalic vaginal birth not achieved (CS + breech vaginal birth) (primary) · patients with breech presentation
Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic… (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.65 [0.47, 0.89]1 study · 108 participantsLow
Single‐dose antibiotic vs short‐course (four‐ to seven‐day) antibiotic
No cure ‐ all trials · patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy
Duration of treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.28 [0.87, 1.88]13 studies · 1502 participantsVery low
Single‐dose antibiotic vs short‐course (four‐ to seven‐day) antibiotic
Recurrent asymptomatic bacteriuria ‐ all trials · patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy
Duration of treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.13 [0.77, 1.66]8 studies · 445 participantsVery low
Single‐dose antibiotic vs short‐course (four‐ to seven‐day) antibiotic
Pyelonephritis ‐ Same antimicrobial agent only4 · patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy
Duration of treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 3.09 [0.54, 17.55]2 studies · 102 participantsVery low
Single‐dose antibiotic vs short‐course (four‐ to seven‐day) antibiotic
Low birthweight ‐ Same antimicrobial agent only · patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy
Duration of treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.65 [1.06, 2.57]1 study · 714 participantsHigh
Single‐dose antibiotic vs short‐course (four‐ to seven‐day) antibiotic
Preterm delivery ‐ Same antimicrobial agent only · patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy
Duration of treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.17 [0.77, 1.78]3 studies · 804 participantsModerate
Single‐dose antibiotic vs short‐course (four‐ to seven‐day) antibiotic
Side effects ‐ all trials · patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy
Duration of treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.7 [0.56, 0.88]12 studies · 1460 participantsLow
Single‐dose antibiotic vs short‐course (four‐ to seven‐day) antibiotic
Same antimicrobial agent ‐ No cure (good quality studies) · patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy
Duration of treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.72 [1.27, 2.33]2 studies · 803 participantsHigh
Single‐dose antibiotic vs short‐course (four‐ to seven‐day) antibiotic
Different antimicrobial agents ‐ No cure (good quality studies) · patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy
Duration of treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.36 [0.24, 7.75]1 study · 84 participantsLow
Reduced number of antenatal care visits/goal‐oriented vs standard antenatal care visits
Maternal death · low‐risk pregnancy
Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low‐risk pregnancy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.13 [0.5, 2.57]3 studies · 51504 participantsLow
Reduced number of antenatal care visits/goal‐oriented vs standard antenatal care visits
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (including pre‐eclampsia) · low‐risk pregnancy
Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low‐risk pregnancy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.95 [0.8, 1.12]6 studies · 54108 participantsLow
Reduced number of antenatal care visits/goal‐oriented vs standard antenatal care visits
Perinatal death · low‐risk pregnancy
Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low‐risk pregnancy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.14 [1, 1.31]5 studies · 56431 participantsModerate
Reduced number of antenatal care visits/goal‐oriented vs standard antenatal care visits
Preterm birth · low‐risk pregnancy
Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low‐risk pregnancy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.02 [0.94, 1.11]7 studies · 53661 participantsModerate
Reduced number of antenatal care visits/goal‐oriented vs standard antenatal care visits
Small‐for‐gestational age · low‐risk pregnancy
Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low‐risk pregnancy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.99 [0.91, 1.09]4 studies · 43045 participantsModerate
Reduced number of antenatal care visits/goal‐oriented vs standard antenatal care visits
Neonatal intensive care unit admission · low‐risk pregnancy
Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low‐risk pregnancy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.89 [0.79, 1.02]5 studies · 43048 participantsModerate
Rutoside vs placebo
Woman's perception of pain (as defined by trialists) · Pregnant women with varicose veins and leg oedema in pregnancy
Interventions for varicose veins and leg oedema in pregnancy (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Rutoside vs placebo
Complications associated with varicose veins and leg oedema (deep vein thrombosis) · Pregnant women with varicose veins and leg oedema in pregnancy
Interventions for varicose veins and leg oedema in pregnancy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.17 [0.01, 3.49]1 study · 69 participantsModerate
Rutoside vs placebo
Symptoms associated with varicose veins and oedema (improvement in symptoms) · Pregnant women with varicose veins and leg oedema in pregnancy
Interventions for varicose veins and leg oedema in pregnancy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.89 [1.11, 3.22]1 study · 69 participantsModerate