Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

3,696 questions · 3,815 findings · 855 reviews

No studies found 573 · 15%GRADE not reported 374 · 9.8%Very low 993 · 26%Low 1,062 · 27.8%Moderate 614 · 16.1%High 199 · 5.2%

Interventions for increasing immunosuppressant medication adherence vs usual care

Drug holidays · solid organ transplant recipients

Interventions for increasing immunosuppressant medication adherence showed no clear difference in drug holidays compared with standard care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Ultrasound‐assisted catheter‐directed thrombolysis plus standard intravenous heparinisation vs standard intravenous heparinisation

All‐cause mortality (90‐day) · people with intermediate‐risk (submassive) APE

It is very uncertain whether ultrasound‐assisted catheter‐directed thrombolysis plus standard… changes all‐cause mortality (90‐day) compared with standard intravenous heparinisation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Very potent vs potent topical corticosteroid

Local adverse events: skin thinning; end of treatment (1 to 3 weeks) · adults with eczema

It is very uncertain whether very potent changes local adverse events: skin thinning; end of treatment (day 11‐day 22) compared with potent topical corticosteroid (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Moderate‐potency vs mild‐potency topical corticosteroid

Systemic adverse events: abnormal cortisol; end of treatment (1‐6 weeks) · children and adults with mild to severe eczema

It is very uncertain whether moderate‐potency changes systemic adverse events: abnormal cortisol; end of treatment (6‐28… compared with mild‐potency topical corticosteroid (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Running shoes recommended and selected on foot posture vs running shoes not recommended and selected on foot posture

Injury Incidence Rate (injuries / 1000 person‐days)a · military personnel

Running shoes recommended and selected on foot posture showed no clear difference in injury Incidence Rate (injuries / 1000 person‐days)a compared with running shoes not recommended and selected on foot posture (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review