Cochrane · systematic review · CD013285

Exercise versus airway clearance techniques for people with cystic fibrosis

Heinz, KD, Walsh, A, Southern, KW, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2022 · Cochrane Library

SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
21
current version
GRADE rated
8
No studies
13
Included studies
NR
No studies 13 · 61.9%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 8 · 38.1%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Exercise compared with ACBT for people with cystic fibrosis

Population: adolescents and adults with cystic fibrosis
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pulmonary function: absolute change FEV1 % predicted
Exercise vs ACBT
no estimate extracted1 study · 18 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Change in VO2 peak during maximal exercise
Exercise vs ACBT
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Quality of life
Exercise vs ACBT
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse effects
Exercise vs ACBT
no estimate extracted1 study · 18 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Participant preference: VAS score for treatment effectiveness and preference.
Exercise vs ACBT
no estimate extracted1 study · 18 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Adherence
Exercise vs ACBT
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Need for extra antibiotics (days)
Exercise vs ACBT
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Exercise plus PD&P compared with PD&P only for people with cystic fibrosis

Population: children and young adults with cystic fibrosis
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pulmonary function: absolute change FEV1 % predicted
Exercise plus PD&P vs PD&P only
no estimate extracted2 studies · 55 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Change in VO2 peak during maximal exercise
Exercise plus PD&P vs PD&P only
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Quality of Life: change in CFQ‐R score
Exercise plus PD&P vs PD&P only
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse effects
Exercise plus PD&P vs PD&P only
no estimate extracted1 study · 17 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Participant preference
Exercise plus PD&P vs PD&P only
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adherence
Exercise plus PD&P vs PD&P only
no estimate extracted1 study · 17 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Need for extra antibiotics (days)
Exercise plus PD&P vs PD&P only
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Exercise compared with underwater PEP (uPEP; also known as bubble PEP) for people with cystic fibrosis

Population: children and adults with cystic fibrosis
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pulmonary function: absolute change FEV1 % predicted
Exercise vs underwater PEP (uPEP; also known
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Change in VO2 peak during maximal exercise
Exercise vs underwater PEP (uPEP; also known
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Quality of life: change in CFQ‐R score
Exercise vs underwater PEP (uPEP; also known
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse effects
Exercise vs underwater PEP (uPEP; also known
no estimate extracted1 study · 13 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Participant preference: VAS test and a questionnaire to evaluate acceptability of technique to participants
Exercise vs underwater PEP (uPEP; also known
no estimate extracted1 study · 13 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Adherence
Exercise vs underwater PEP (uPEP; also known
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Need for extra antibiotics (days)
Exercise vs underwater PEP (uPEP; also known
no estimate extractedNRNo studies