Return to work · patients with coronary heart disease
Psychological interventions (including health education) showed no clear difference in proportion of participants at work in the long term (> 1 to < 5 years) compared with usual care (low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Behavioural outcome: physical activity IVR versus usual care, control or health education · participants at risk of developing long‐term conditions
1 finding from 1 review
Health outcomes Bronchial obstruction (FEV), higher score indicates less bronchial obstruction. Theoretical maximum scores were 2.72 for the multimedia and 3.14 for the control group. · patients taking prescribed and over‐the‐counter medications or their carers
1 finding from 1 review
Health outcomes ‐ not measured · patients taking prescribed and over‐the‐counter medications or their carers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Healthcare professionals' practice outcome measured using dichotomous variablesAbsolute risk difference across various outcomes · Healthcare professionals
1 finding from 1 review
Changes in professional practice (continuous) · Healthcare professionals
3 findings from 1 review
Patient outcomes (dichotomous) · Healthcare professionals
1 finding from 1 review
Patient outcomes (continuous) · Healthcare professionals
1 finding from 1 review
Patient health outcome Standardised median change in slope across various outcomes · Healthcare professionals
1 finding from 1 review
Changes to professional behavior ‐ use of EHI · medical residents; allied health personnel; physicians, midwives, nurses
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
183 participants
Low
Healthcare professionals' practice outcome measured using dichotomous variablesAbsolute risk difference across various outcomes · Physicians
1 finding from 1 review
Changes in professional practice (continuous) · Physicians
1 finding from 1 review
Knowledge · staff caring for patients at risk of pressure ulcers
2 findings from 1 review
Proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer · staff caring for patients at risk of pressure ulcers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Severity of pressure ulcers · staff caring for patients at risk of pressure ulcers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Patient‐reported outcomes · staff caring for patients at risk of pressure ulcers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Carer‐reported outcomes · staff caring for patients at risk of pressure ulcers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Health Service Utilisation · prescribers or patients that are subjected to educational interventions in prescribing due to government, non‐government or third party…
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Health outcomes · prescribers or patients that are subjected to educational interventions in prescribing due to government, non‐government or third party…
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Health Service Utilisation · prescribers or patients that are subjected to regulatory and educational interventions in prescribing due to government, non‐government or…
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found