Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

3,747 questions · 3,943 findings · 594 reviews

No studies found 784 · 19.9%GRADE not reported 530 · 13.4%Very low 1,040 · 26.4%Low 981 · 24.9%Moderate 444 · 11.3%High 164 · 4.2%

Any intervention to manage relapse: fixed options (labial braces, lingual braces, fixed lingual wire) or removable options (Hawley's retainer with spring elastomeric module, Bloore removable aligner, other Hawley's retainer modifications, Invisalign, Clearstep) vs no intervention or another intervention

Assessment of the alignment of the lower front teeth using any method or index · Participants who previously underwent orthodontic treatment, with subsequent crowding (relapse) of the lower front teeth (lower incisors…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

A permanent restorative material or technique (e.g. amalgam; glass ionomer (type I-IV); composite resin (macrofilled, microfilled, hybrid, nanofilled); resin-modified glass ionomer (compomer, giomer); cement/cermet; stainless steel or nickel-chrome crown; pre-fabricated resin/porcelain veneer facing; microabrasion) vs A different permanent restorative material or technique

Outcome not reported · Children and adolescents under 18 years with amelogenesis imperfecta requiring restorative care of anterior teeth, irrespective of…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

A permanent restorative material or technique (e.g. amalgam; glass ionomer (type I-IV); composite resin (macrofilled, microfilled, hybrid, nanofilled); resin-modified glass ionomer (compomer, giomer); cement/cermet; stainless steel or nickel-chrome crown; pre-fabricated resin/porcelain veneer facing; microabrasion) vs A different permanent restorative material or technique

Outcome not reported · Children and adolescents under 18 years with amelogenesis imperfecta requiring restorative care of posterior teeth, irrespective of…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Magnesium sulphate vs placebo (outcomes

Intraventricular haemorrhage, Papile grade 3/4 · women at risk of preterm birth (< 34 weeks' gestation)

Magnesium sulphate probably leads to lower severe intraventricular haemorrhage (grade 3 or 4) (newborn/infant)** compared with placebo (outcomes (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surfactant administration via laryngeal mask airway (S‐LMA) vs surfactant administration through an endotracheal tube (S‐ETT)

Intraventricular haemorrhage, Papile grade 3/4 · preterm infants with or at risk of respiratory distress syndrome

It is very uncertain whether surfactant administration via laryngeal mask airway (S‐LMA) changes intraventricular haemorrhage grade III and IV Anytime to discharge compared with surfactant administration via endotracheal tube (ETT) with… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surfactant administration via laryngeal mask airway (S‐LMA) vs surfactant administration via endotracheal tube (ETT) with the intent to rapidly extubate (InSurE)

Intraventricular haemorrhage, Papile grade 3/4 · preterm infants with or at risk of respiratory distress syndrome
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Anthropometric measures other than body weight a) BMI b) Waist circumference c) Fat mass · participants living with overweight or obesity
1 finding from 1 review

nHFV vs nIPPV following failure of initial non‐invasive respiratory support

Intraventricular haemorrhage, Papile grade 3/4 · ventilated preterm infants with failure of initial non‐invasive respiratory support

nHFV showed no clear difference in intraventricular haemorrhage, Papile grade 3/4 compared with nIPPV following failure of initial non‐invasive respiratory support (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review