Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

442 questions · 468 findings · 55 reviews

No studies found 96 · 20.5%GRADE not reported 54 · 11.5%Very low 172 · 36.8%Low 87 · 18.6%Moderate 40 · 8.5%High 19 · 4.1%

Single‐incision slings vs retropubic minimally‐invasive slings

Number of women with mesh exposure, extrusion or erosion in any area · women with urinary incontinence

Single‐incision slings showed no clear difference in number of women with mesh exposure, extrusion or erosion in any area compared with retropubic minimally‐invasive slings (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single‐incision slings vs transobturator minimally‐invasive slings

Number of women with mesh exposure, extrusion or erosion in any area · women with urinary incontinence

Single‐incision slings leads to lower number of women with mesh exposure, extrusion or erosion in any area compared with transobturator minimally‐invasive slings (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single‐incision slings vs autologous fascial slings

Number of women with mesh exposure, extrusion or erosion in any area · women with urinary incontinence

Single‐incision slings showed no clear difference in number of women with mesh exposure, extrusion or erosion in any area compared with autologous fascial slings (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Prophylactic antibiotics vs placebo or no treatment

Mesh exposure · women with urinary stress incontinence undergoing continence surgery

It is very uncertain whether prophylactic antibiotics (single or combined drugs) changes number of mesh exposures within six weeks after the operation compared with placebo or no treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Cohort studies postexposure prophylaxis · children 9 months to 15 years old

The intervention may leads to lower cohort studies postexposure prophylaxis (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Standard treatment plus systemic corticosteroids vs usual care

Adverse effects: exposure keratopathy · patients age 10 years and older with periorbital or orbital cellulitis

It is very uncertain whether standard treatment plus systemic corticosteroids changes adverse effects: exposure keratopathy compared with standard treatment alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Adalimumab vs placebo

Failure to maintain clinical or endoscopic response with prior TNF‐α antagonist exposure · Participants with Crohn's disease in remission

Adalimumab probably leads to lower failure to maintain clinical or endoscopic response with prior TNF‐α… compared with placebo (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Re‐exposure to IPV score Scales: Revised Conflict Tactics Scales, Composite Abuse Scale Direction: lower better · women aged 16 years and older who self‐report previous or current experience of intimate partner violence
1 finding from 1 review

Biomedical risk assessment vs Control (waitlist, routine/standard oral health education, or minimal intervention)

Smoking cessation · people who smoke

Biomedical risk assessment showed no clear difference in feedback on smoking exposure Smoking cessation at longest compared with standard care or minimal intervention (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review