What do systematic reviews say?

Oestrogen therapy alone vs devices such

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Oestrogen therapy for treating pelvic organ prolapse in postmenopausal women 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Oestrogen therapy alone vs surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Oestrogen therapy for treating pelvic organ prolapse in postmenopausal women 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Oestrogen therapy alone vs surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Oestrogen therapy for treating pelvic organ prolapse in postmenopausal women 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Oestrogen therapy alone vs surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Oestrogen therapy for treating pelvic organ prolapse in postmenopausal women 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Oestrogen therapy alone vs no treatment or placebo

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Oestrogen therapy for treating pelvic organ prolapse in postmenopausal women 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Oestrogen therapy alone vs no treatment or placebo

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Oestrogen therapy for treating pelvic organ prolapse in postmenopausal women 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Oestrogen therapy alone vs pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Oestrogen therapy for treating pelvic organ prolapse in postmenopausal women 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Thrombo‐aspiration alone vs stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone

Thrombo‐aspiration alone showed no clear difference in functional independence at 3 months (mRS 0 to 2) (primary outcome) compared with stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone (high certainty).

• Different types of percutaneous endovascular interventions for acute ischemic stroke 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.97 [0.82, 1.13]
  2 studies · 633 participants
  High

Thrombo‐aspiration alone vs stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone

Thrombo‐aspiration alone showed no clear difference in successful reperfusion (mTICI 2b to 3) postprocedure compared with stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone (high certainty).

• Different types of percutaneous endovascular interventions for acute ischemic stroke 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.01 [0.95, 1.07]
  2 studies · 650 participants
  High

Thrombo‐aspiration alone vs stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone

Thrombo‐aspiration alone showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality within 3 months compared with stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone (high certainty).

• Different types of percutaneous endovascular interventions for acute ischemic stroke 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.01 [0.74, 1.37]
  2 studies · 633 participants
  High

Thrombo‐aspiration alone vs stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone

Thrombo‐aspiration alone showed no clear difference in intracranial hemorrhage on imaging at 24 hours compared with stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone (high certainty).

• Different types of percutaneous endovascular interventions for acute ischemic stroke 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.03 [0.86, 1.24]
  2 studies · 645 participants
  High

Thrombo‐aspiration alone vs stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone

Thrombo‐aspiration alone showed no clear difference in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage at 24 hours compared with stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone (high certainty).

• Different types of percutaneous endovascular interventions for acute ischemic stroke 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.9 [0.49, 1.68]
  2 studies · 645 participants
  High

Thrombo‐aspiration alone vs stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone

Thrombo‐aspiration alone showed no clear difference in procedure‐related adverse events within 3 months compared with stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone (high certainty).

• Different types of percutaneous endovascular interventions for acute ischemic stroke 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.98 [0.68, 1.41]
  2 studies · 651 participants
  High

Continuous chest compression alone vs interrupted chest compression plus artificial ventilation

• Continuous chest compression versus interrupted chest compression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation of non‐asphyxial… 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies · 0 participants
  GRADE not reported

Treatment of eclampsia: loading dose alone vs loading dose + maintenance regimen

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Alternative magnesium sulphate regimens for women with pre‐eclampsia and eclampsia 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Prevention of eclampsia: loading dose alone vs loading dose + maintenance regimen

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Alternative magnesium sulphate regimens for women with pre‐eclampsia and eclampsia 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Intermittent iron supplementation (alone or with any other micronutrients) vs no supplementation or placebo

Intermittent iron supplementation (alone or with any other… showed no clear difference in iron deficiency anaemia (as defined by the presence of anaemia plus… compared with no supplementation or placebo (low certainty).

• Intermittent iron supplementation for reducing anaemia and its associated impairments in adolescent and adult… 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.07 [0, 1.16]
  1 study · 97 participants
  Low

Intermittent iron supplementation (alone or with any other micronutrients) vs no supplementation or placebo

Intermittent iron supplementation (alone or with any other… showed no clear difference in any adverse side effects compared with no supplementation or placebo (moderate certainty).

• Intermittent iron supplementation for reducing anaemia and its associated impairments in adolescent and adult… 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.98 [0.31, 12.72]
  3 studies · 630 participants
  Moderate

Rice fortified with iron alone or in combination with other micronutrients vs unfortified rice (no micronutrients added)

Rice fortified with iron alone or in combination with other… may leads to higher any adverse effects (hookworm infection risk) compared with unfortified rice (no micronutrients added) (low certainty).

• Fortification of rice with vitamins and minerals for addressing micronutrient malnutrition 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.78 [1.18, 2.7]
  1 study · 785 participants
  Low

Any intervention for KCOT (e.g. enucleation), alone or combined with an adjunctive therapy (ostectomy, cryotherapy, or Carnoy's solution) vs A different intervention (e.g. enucleation versus marsupialisation), or the same surgical intervention without the adjunctive therapy

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for the treatment of keratocystic odontogenic tumours 2015 · Cochrane All outcomes
  No randomised controlled trials that met the inclusion criteria were identified. In view of the fact that no studies were identified, no data were available for analysis.
  0 studies
  No studies found