Question · asked by 1 review
Oestrogen therapy alone vs pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT): Subjective improvement or cure of POP symptoms
- Population
- women with POP
- Intervention
- Oestrogen therapy alone
- Comparison
- pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT)
- Outcome
- Subjective improvement or cure of POP symptoms
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Oestrogen therapy alone vs pelvic floor muscle training Subjective improvement or cure of POP symptoms · women with POP The review found no eligible studies for this question. Oestrogen therapy for treating pelvic organ prolapse in postmenopausal women (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oestrogen therapy for treating pelvic organ prolapse in postmenopausal women 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Oestrogen therapy alone vs devices such · women with POP · 1 review
- Oestrogen therapy alone vs no treatment or placebo · women with POP · 1 review
- Oestrogen therapy alone vs surgery · women with POP · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.