Cochrane · systematic review · CD010134
Continuous chest compression versus interrupted chest compression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation of non‐asphyxial out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest
Zhan, L, Yang, LJ, Huang, Y, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2017 · Cochrane Library
Emergency and Critical CareAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
14
current version
GRADE rated
8
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 6 · 42.9%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 4 · 28.6%High 4 · 28.6%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Continuous chest compression alone compared to interrupted chest compression plus artificial ventilation for out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest
Population: People with non‐trauma related out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Survival to hospital discharge Continuous chest compression alone vs interrupted chest compression plus artificial ventilation | RR 1.21 [1.01, 1.46] | 3 studies · 3031 participants | High |
Survival to hospital admission Continuous chest compression alone vs interrupted chest compression plus artificial ventilation | RR 1.18 [0.94, 1.48] | 1 study · 520 participants | Moderate Downgraded: imprecision |
Survival at one year Continuous chest compression alone vs interrupted chest compression plus artificial ventilation | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 0 participants | Ungraded |
Neurological outcomes at hospital discharge Measured as 'good' or 'moderate' with Cerebral Performance Category classification Continuous chest compression alone vs interrupted chest compression plus artificial ventilation | RR 1.25 [0.94, 1.66] | 1 study · 1286 participants | Moderate Downgraded: imprecision |
Return of spontaneous circulation Continuous chest compression alone vs interrupted chest compression plus artificial ventilation | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 0 participants | Ungraded |
Adverse effects Continuous chest compression alone vs interrupted chest compression plus artificial ventilation | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 0 participants | Ungraded |
Quality of life Continuous chest compression alone vs interrupted chest compression plus artificial ventilation | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 0 participants | Ungraded |
Continuous chest compression plus ventilation compared to interrupted chest compression plus ventilation for people with non asphyxial out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest
Population: Patients with non‐trauma related out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Survival to hospital discharge Continuous chest compression plus ventilation vs interrupted chest compression plus ventilation | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 23648 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |
Survival to hospital admission Continuous chest compression plus ventilation vs interrupted chest compression plus ventilation | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 23711 participants | High |
Survival at one year Continuous chest compression plus ventilation vs interrupted chest compression plus ventilation | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 0 participants | Ungraded |
Neurological outcomes at hospital discharge (Rankin score ≤ 3) Continuous chest compression plus ventilation vs interrupted chest compression plus ventilation | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 23555 participants | High |
Return of spontaneous circulation Continuous chest compression plus ventilation vs interrupted chest compression plus ventilation | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 23697 participants | High |
Adverse effects Defined as any adverse event occurring post‐admission Continuous chest compression plus ventilation vs interrupted chest compression plus ventilation | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 23711 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Quality of life Continuous chest compression plus ventilation vs interrupted chest compression plus ventilation | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 0 participants | Ungraded |