Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

165 questions · 173 findings · 17 reviews

No studies found 45 · 26%GRADE not reported 12 · 6.9%Very low 37 · 21.4%Low 50 · 28.9%Moderate 25 · 14.5%High 4 · 2.3%

Auto‐CPAP vs fixed CPAP

Number of participants using machine for 4 or more hours per night · adults with a diagnosis of OSA

Auto‐CPAP showed no clear difference in number of participants using machine for 4 or more hours per night compared with fixed CPAP (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Auto‐CPAP vs fixed CPAP

Withdrawals (parallel group trials/first arm cross‐over trials) · adults with a diagnosis of OSA

Auto‐CPAP showed no clear difference in withdrawals (parallel group trials/first arm cross‐over trials) Median compared with fixed CPAP (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Adaptive servo ventilation (ASV) vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)

Cardiovascular mortality

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

Adaptive servo ventilation (ASV) vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)

Serious adverse events

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

Adaptive servo ventilation (ASV) vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)

Quality of sleep

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

Adaptive servo ventilation (ASV) vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)

All‐cause mortality

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

Adaptive servo ventilation (ASV) vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)

Time to life‐saving cardiovascular intervention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review