Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,126 questions · 1,225 findings · 111 reviews

No studies found 235 · 19.2%GRADE not reported 260 · 21.2%Very low 207 · 16.9%Low 271 · 22.1%Moderate 177 · 14.4%High 75 · 6.1%

CC+AA (homozygous) genotypes vs CA (heterozygous) genotype

Dental caries · Children (<18 years) with vs without dental caries

ApaI(rs7975232) over-dominant model: CC+AA vs CA was not significantly associated with dental caries (OR 0.91); ungraded.

1 finding from 1 review

AA+GG (homozygous) genotypes vs AG (heterozygous) genotype

Dental caries · Children (<18 years) with vs without dental caries

FokI(rs2228570) over-dominant model: AA+GG vs AG was not significantly associated with dental caries (OR 1.04); ungraded.

1 finding from 1 review

C allele vs A allele

Dental caries · Children (<18 years) with vs without dental caries

ApaI(rs7975232) allelic model: C vs A was not significantly associated with dental caries (OR 0.89); ungraded.

1 finding from 1 review

TT+CC (homozygous) genotypes vs CT (heterozygous) genotype

Dental caries · Children (<18 years) with vs without dental caries

Over-dominant model (CC+TT vs CT) at FokI(rs10735810) showed no significant association with caries (OR 0.83); ungraded.

1 finding from 1 review

A allele vs G allele

Dental caries · Children (<18 years) with vs without dental caries

FokI(rs2228570) allelic model: A vs G was not significantly associated with dental caries (OR 1.07); ungraded.

1 finding from 1 review

Lutein with or without zeaxanthin vs placebo

Progression to visual loss (loss of 3 or more lines on logMAR chart) · people with AMD

Lutein with or without zeaxanthin showed no clear difference in progression to visual loss (loss of 3 or more lines on logMAR chart) compared with placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review