Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,315 questions · 23,557 findings · 2,311 reviews

No studies found 4,183 · 17.8%GRADE not reported 3,930 · 16.7%Very low 5,371 · 22.8%Low 5,787 · 24.6%Moderate 3,320 · 14.1%High 966 · 4.1%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Root carious dentin vs Coronal carious dentin

MMP-13 presence/activity · Human ex vivo carious dentin

MMP-13 may be increased in root compared with coronal carious dentin, but the evidence is very uncertain (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Carious dentin vs Sound dentin

Cathepsin B (CT-B) presence/activity · Human ex vivo carious dentin (mostly coronal), natural caries lesions

Cathepsin B may be increased in carious dentin compared with sound dentin, but the evidence is very uncertain (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Carious dentin before cavity sealing vs Carious dentin after cavity sealing

MMP-2 expression/activity · Human ex vivo carious dentin under sealed cavities

MMP-2 shows no difference before vs after cavity sealing; the evidence is very uncertain (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Irradiated carious dentin vs Non-irradiated carious dentin

MMP-20 expression · Human ex vivo carious dentin (head/neck radiotherapy)

MMP-20 shows no difference between irradiated and non-irradiated carious dentin; the evidence is very uncertain (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Dental caries (carious oral microbiome) vs Caries-free / healthy oral microbiome

Differential microbial abundance / taxa predictive of caries · Individuals providing oral (saliva/supragingival plaque) 16S rRNA microbiome samples; 2016 samples from 19 studies (mixed children and…

A group of genera/species (notably Selenomonas, Aggregatibacter, Actinomyces, Treponema) was predictive of caries, whereas Streptococcus was not (ungraded).

1 finding from 1 review
  • Meta-analysis of caries microbiome studies can improve upon disease prediction outcomes. 2022 All outcomes
    Oral cavity microbiome (saliva and supragingival plaque samples); pooled across 19 international studies
    Mean-decrease-accuracy discriminating taxa: Capnocytophaga HMT-338, Lactobacillus panis, Treponema HMT-230, Bifidobacterium longum, Delftia acidovorans, Staphylococcus schleiferi; higher log2FC in caries: Selenomonas HMT-146, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Actinomyces HMT-896, Treponema HMT-257; Streptococcus not predictive
    19 studies · 2016 participants
    GRADE not reported

Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable

Dental caries prevalence · Children aged 12 years (plus or minus one year) in Africa

The pooled dental-caries prevalence was 0.3657 (95% CI 0.3065 to 0.4250); GRADE was not reported.

2 findings from 1 review

Probiotics vs placebo or no treatment

Number of participants who used prescribed antibiotics for acute URTIs · children, adults, and the elderly

Intention‐to‐treat analysis: probiotics probably leads to lower number of participants who used prescribed antibiotics for acute URTIs compared with placebo or no treatment (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Guidewire‐assisted cannulation vs contrast‐assisted cannulation

Need for precut sphincterotomy · Patients undergoing diagnostic or therapeutic ERCP

Guidewire‐assisted cannulation probably leads to lower need for precut sphincterotomy compared with contrast‐assisted cannulation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review