Question · asked by 1 review
Calcium supplementation/fortification vs control: Systolic blood pressure
- Population
- People who may be at risk for primary hypertension
- Intervention
- Calcium supplementation/fortification
- Comparison
- control
- Outcome
- Systolic blood pressure
What each review found
Include earlier review versionsNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 1 · 50%High 1 · 50%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Calcium supplementation/fortification vs control Systolic blood pressure (range of · People who may be at risk for primary hypertension Calcium supplementation for prevention of primary hypertension (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 18 studies · 3140 participants | High |
Calcium supplementation/fortification vs control Systolic blood pressure. Less than 35 years of age (range of · People who may be at risk for primary hypertension Calcium supplementation for prevention of primary hypertension (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 9 studies · 452 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium supplementation for prevention of primary hypertension 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.