Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

3,601 questions in 252 reviews · Pregnancy and Childbirth

current versions
No studies 726 · 20.2%Ungraded 421 · 11.7%Very low 828 · 23%Low 993 · 27.6%Moderate 486 · 13.5%High 147 · 4.1%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Intermittent electronic fetal monitoring (CTG) vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Mobility or restriction during labour · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Intermittent electronic fetal monitoring (CTG) vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Postnatal depression · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Doppler vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Apgar < 7 at 5 minutes · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.76 [0.2, 2.87]2 studies · 2598 participantsVery low
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Doppler vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Cord blood acidosis · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Doppler vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Seizures in the neonatal period · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.05 [0, 0.91]1 study · 627 participantsVery low
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Doppler vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Perinatal mortality · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.69 [0.09, 5.4]2 studies · 2597 participantsVery low
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Doppler vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Composite of mortality and serious morbidity · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Intermittent electronic fetal monitoring (CTG) vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Cord blood acidosis · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Doppler vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Cerebral palsy · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Doppler vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Neurosensory disability · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Doppler vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Caesarean section for fetal distress and/or fetal acidosis · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
RR 2.71 [1.64, 4.48]1 study · 627 participantsModerate
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Doppler vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Instrumental vaginal birth · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.35 [0.78, 2.32]1 study · 627 participantsLow
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Doppler vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Maternal mortality · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Doppler vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Any pharmacological or non‐pharmacological analgesia use excluding epidural · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Doppler vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Epidural anaesthesia for pain relief excluding for caesarean section · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Doppler vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Mobility or restriction during labour · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Doppler vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Postnatal depression · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Intensive Pinard vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Apgar < 7 at 5 minutes · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.9 [0.35, 2.31]1 study · 625 participantsVery low
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Intermittent electronic fetal monitoring (CTG) vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Neonatal seizures · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.05 [0, 0.89]1 study · 633 participantsLow
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Intensive Pinard vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Cord blood acidosis · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Intensive Pinard vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Neonatal seizures · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.68 [0.24, 1.88]1 study · 625 participantsVery low
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Intensive Pinard vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Perinatal mortality · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.56 [0.19, 1.67]1 study · 625 participantsVery low
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Intensive Pinard vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Composite of mortality and serious morbidity · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Intensive Pinard vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Cerebral palsy · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Intensive Pinard vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Neurosensory disability · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Intensive Pinard vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Caesarean section for fetal distress and/or fetal acidosis · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.7 [0.35, 1.38]1 study · 625 participantsLow
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Intensive Pinard vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Instrumental vaginal birth · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.21 [0.69, 2.11]1 study · 625 participantsLow
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Intensive Pinard vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Maternal morbidity · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Intensive Pinard vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Any pharmacological or non‐pharmacological analgesia use excluding epidural · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Intermittent electronic fetal monitoring (CTG) vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Perinatal mortality · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.88 [0.34, 2.25]1 study · 633 participantsVery low
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Intensive Pinard vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Epidural anaesthesia for pain relief excluding caesarean section · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Intensive Pinard vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Mobility or restriction during labour · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Intensive Pinard vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Postnatal depression · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Intermittent electronic fetal monitoring (CTG) vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Composite of mortality and serious morbidity · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Intermittent electronic fetal monitoring (CTG) vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Cerebral palsy · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Intermittent electronic fetal monitoring (CTG) vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Neurosensory disability · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Intermittent electronic fetal monitoring (CTG) vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Caesarean section for fetal distress and/or fetal acidosis · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
RR 2.92 [1.78, 4.8]1 study · 633 participantsModerate
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Intermittent electronic fetal monitoring (CTG) vs routine Pinard (outcomes
Instrumental vaginal birth · women in established labour and their babies.
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.46 [0.86, 2.49]1 study · 633 participantsLow
Cerclage vs no cerclage
All perinatal losses · preventing preterm birth in women with singleton pregnancy
Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.82 [0.65, 1.04]10 studies · 2927 participantsModerate
Cerclage vs no cerclage
Serious neonatal morbidity · preventing preterm birth in women with singleton pregnancy
Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.8 [0.55, 1.18]6 studies · 883 participantsLow
Cerclage vs no cerclage
Baby discharged home healthy · preventing preterm birth in women with singleton pregnancy
Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.02 [0.97, 1.06]4 studies · 657 participantsModerate
Cerclage vs no cerclage
Stillbirths · preventing preterm birth in women with singleton pregnancy
Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.89 [0.45, 1.75]5 studies · 1803 participantsLow
Cerclage vs no cerclage
Neonatal deaths before discharge · preventing preterm birth in women with singleton pregnancy
Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.85 [0.53, 1.39]6 studies · 1714 participantsLow
Cerclage vs no cerclage
Preterm birth before 34 completed weeks · preventing preterm birth in women with singleton pregnancy
Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.77 [0.66, 0.89]9 studies · 2415 participantsHigh
Spontaneous pushing vs directed pushing
Duration of second stage (minutes) · women in the second stage of labour
Pushing/bearing down methods for the second stage of labour (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted6 studies · 667 participantsVery low
Delayed pushing vs immediate pushing (all women with epidural)
Admission to neonatal intensive care · women in the second stage of labour with epidural in situ
Pushing/bearing down methods for the second stage of labour (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.98 [0.67, 1.41]3 studies · 2197 participantsLow
Delayed pushing vs immediate pushing (all women with epidural)
Hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy · women in the second stage of labour with epidural in situ
Pushing/bearing down methods for the second stage of labour (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Delayed pushing vs immediate pushing (all women with epidural)
5‐minute Apgar score < 7 · women in the second stage of labour with epidural in situ
Pushing/bearing down methods for the second stage of labour (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.15 [0.01, 3]3 studies · 413 participantsVery low
Delayed pushing vs immediate pushing (all women with epidural)
Duration of pushing (minutes) · women in the second stage of labour with epidural in situ
Pushing/bearing down methods for the second stage of labour (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted11 studies · 2932 participantsVery low
Delayed pushing vs immediate pushing (all women with epidural)
Spontaneous vaginal delivery · women in the second stage of labour with epidural in situ
Pushing/bearing down methods for the second stage of labour (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.07 [1.03, 1.11]12 studies · 3114 participantsModerate