Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

2,536 questions · 2,637 findings · 315 reviews

No studies found 608 · 23.1%GRADE not reported 488 · 18.5%Very low 688 · 26.1%Low 540 · 20.5%Moderate 249 · 9.4%High 64 · 2.4%

Intervention not reported

Proportion of VHVs who reported notifying a HCW about deliveries or births using mobile phones (post‐intervention comparison) · Health Care Workers (HCWs), Village Health Volunteers (VHVs), newborn children
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Proportion of HCWs who reported receiving a notification from VHV about deliveries or birth using mobile phones (post‐intervention comparison) · Health Care Workers (HCWs), Village Health Volunteers (VHVs), newborn children
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Health‐related quality of life (generic) SF‐36 (Physical Component Summary (PCS) score) Scale from 0‐100 Higher value post intervention is favourable, indicating improvement in health‐related quality of life · people with stable COPD
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Health‐related quality of life (generic) SF‐36 (Mental Component Sumary (MCS) score) Scale from 0‐100 Higher value post intervention is favourable, indicating improvement in health‐related quality of life · people with stable COPD
1 finding from 1 review

Re‐written guideline text vs original guideline text

Process outcome, Practitioner Impact 5. Staff did not provide psychological interventions (as suggested by the guideline) · patients with schizophrenia or related psychoses

Re‐written guideline text showed no clear difference in process outcome, Practitioner Impact 5. Staff did not provide… compared with original guideline text (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Knowledge (Multi‐component intervention) [mean number of correct questionnaire responses, assessed immediately post‐intervention] · People with a health condition or nominally 'well' considering real clinical trial participation (across a range of topic areas)
1 finding from 1 review