Cochrane · systematic review · CD001746
Family and carer smoking control programmes for reducing children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke
Behbod, B, Sharma, M, Baxi, R, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2018 · Cochrane Library
Tobacco AddictionAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
14
current version
GRADE rated
13
No studies
1
Included studies
NR
No studies 1 · 7.1%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 9 · 64.3%Low 4 · 28.6%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Summary of findings: community‐based interventions for reducing children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke
Population: people who smoke and are involved in the care of young children (birth to 12 years of age)
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Multi‐component, counselling‐based interventions | no estimate extracted | 7 studies · 2880 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency |
Multi‐comoponent, education‐based interventions | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 307 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency |
In‐person counselling (no additional components) | no estimate extracted | 6 studies · 1001 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency |
Telephone counselling | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 347 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency |
Summary of findings: interventions in the ill‐child setting for reducing children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke
Population: people who smoke and are involved in the care of young children (birth to 12 years of age)
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Multi‐component, counselling‐based interventions | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 746 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
Multi‐component, education‐based interventions | no estimate extracted | 7 studies · 2936 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
In‐person counselling (no additional components) | no estimate extracted | 8 studies · 1835 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
Telephone counselling | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Brief interventions | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 100 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
Summary of findings: interventions in the well‐child setting for reducing children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke
Population: people who smoke and are involved in the care of young children (birth to 12 years of age)
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Multi‐component, counselling‐based interventions | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 8005 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
Multi‐component, education‐based interventions | no estimate extracted | 4 studies · 1401 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
In‐person counselling (no additional components) | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 1483 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
Telephone counselling | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 952 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
Brief interventions | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 218 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |