TENS vs sham
- Non‐pharmacological interventions for chronic pain in multiple sclerosis 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted1 study · 90 participantsVery low
Antihypertensive drug leads to lower total mortality Mean duration of 3.8 years compared with placebo or no treatment (high certainty).
Antihypertensive drug probably leads to lower cardiovascular mortality and morbidity Mean duration of 3.7 years compared with placebo or no treatment (moderate certainty).
Antihypertensive drug probably leads to lower cerebrovascular mortality and morbidity Mean duration of 3.7 years compared with placebo or no treatment (moderate certainty).
Antihypertensive drug probably leads to lower coronary heart disease mortality and morbidity Mean duration of 2.9… compared with placebo or no treatment (moderate certainty).
Antihypertensive drug may leads to higher withdrawals due to adverse effects Mean duration of 4.6 years compared with placebo or no treatment (low certainty).
Blood pressure intervention/intensive blood pressure intervention may leads to higher adverse events—hypotension compared with placebo/standard blood pressure intervention (low certainty).
No eligible studies evaluated high-intensity sweeteners such as aspartame, sucralose, or saccharin for their effect on cariogenic bacteria.
It is very uncertain whether antihypertensive therapy changes all‐cause mortality compared with placebo or no treatment (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether antihypertensive therapy changes cardiovascular events compared with placebo or no treatment (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether antihypertensive therapy changes total serious adverse events compared with placebo or no treatment (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether antihypertensive therapy changes hospitalisation for heart failure compared with placebo or no treatment (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether antihypertensive therapy changes withdrawal due to adverse events compared with placebo or no treatment (very low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Intensive Case Management may leads to lower global state: 1. Leaving the study early ‐ by long term compared with non‐Intensive Case Management (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether intensive Case Management changes social functioning 2. Employment status ‐ by medium term ‐ spent > 1… compared with non‐Intensive Case Management (very low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Intensive Case Management showed no clear difference in adverse event: 1b. Death ‐ suicide ‐ by long term compared with non‐Intensive Case Management (low certainty).