Intervention not reported
TUG · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention showed no clear difference in TUG (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
6MWT · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention may leads to higher 6MWT (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
All · adults following hip fracture surgery
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
0 participants
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Mobility scales, using different mobility scales: mPPT (range 0 to 36), POMA (range 0 to 30). · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention probably leads to higher mobility scales, using different mobility scales: mPPT (range 0 to… (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Functioningi ‐ overall analysis Using different scales: mBI (range 0 to 20), BI (range 0 to 100), FIM (range 18 to 126), NEADL (range 0 to 66). A higher score indicates better functioning. · adults following hip fracture surgery
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes functioningi ‐ overall analysis Using different scales: mBI (range 0… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
HRQoL Using EQ‐5D (range 0 to 1) and HOOS (range 0 to 100). A higher score indicates better quality of life. · adults following hip fracture surgery
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes HRQoL Using EQ‐5D (range 0 to 1) and HOOS (range 0 to 100). A higher… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Mortality · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention showed no clear difference in mortality (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Adverse event: number of people who were re‐admitted · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention showed no clear difference in adverse event: number of people who were re‐admitted (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Number of people who returned to living at pre‐fracture residence · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention showed no clear difference in number of people who returned to living at pre‐fracture residence (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Mobility outcome · adults following hip fracture surgery
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Mobility scales, using different mobility scales: MILA (range 0 to 36), EMS (range 0 to 20), BBS (range 0 to 56), PPME (range 0 to 12), Koval (range 1 to 7). Higher values indicate better mobility (except MILA and Koval, where scale was inverted f... · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention probably leads to higher mobility scales, using different mobility scales: MILA (range 0 to… (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Modified Activities Scale for Kids‐performance (ASKp) score (0 to 100%: best outcome) at 4 weeks · children with acute 'low risk' (undisplaced) ankle fractures
1 finding from 1 review
Unacceptable anatomy: leg‐length discrepancy, limp, abnormal gait · children with acute 'low risk' (undisplaced) ankle fractures
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Number of children experiencing adverse outcomes at 4 weeks · children with acute 'low risk' (undisplaced) ankle fractures
It is very uncertain whether ankle brace changes number of children experiencing adverse outcomes at 4 weeks compared with rigid cast (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Return to activity · children with acute 'low risk' (undisplaced) ankle fractures
2 findings from 1 review
Patient satisfaction: would have preferred the other device · children with acute 'low risk' (undisplaced) ankle fractures
Ankle brace may leads to lower patient satisfaction: would have preferred the other device compared with rigid cast (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Faces Pain Scale score at 4 weeks' post ‐injury (0 to 10: greatest pain) · children with acute 'low risk' (undisplaced) ankle fractures
1 finding from 1 review
Pain during activity (short‐term) · patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome (untreated PFPS of over 2 months in duration)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Patient‐reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS, NRS or categorical scale) · patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome (untreated PFPS of over 2 months in duration)
It is very uncertain whether high‐intensity changes usual pain (short‐term) VAS (0 to 10; higher scores mean worse pain) compared with low‐intensity exercise programmes (very low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Pain during activity (long‐term) VAS (0 to 10; higher scores mean worse pain) · patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome (untreated PFPS of over 2 months in duration)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found