Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,956 questions in 143 reviews · Musculoskeletal

current versions
No studies 555 · 28.4%Ungraded 107 · 5.5%Very low 255 · 13%Low 555 · 28.4%Moderate 357 · 18.3%High 127 · 6.5%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Intervention NR
Number of patients experiencing any adverse event · Patients with knee osteoarthritis (none of the trials included patients with hip osteoarthritis)
Therapeutic ultrasound for osteoarthritis of the knee or hip (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 67 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Number of patients who withdrew because of adverse events · Patients with knee osteoarthritis (none of the trials included patients with hip osteoarthritis)
Therapeutic ultrasound for osteoarthritis of the knee or hip (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 67 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Number of patients experiencing any serious adverse event · Patients with knee osteoarthritis (none of the trials included patients with hip osteoarthritis)
Therapeutic ultrasound for osteoarthritis of the knee or hip (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 136 participantsLow
Augmented subscapularis transposition vs subscapularis transposition alone during total shoulder arthroplasty
Pain The Hospital for Special Surgrery 100‐point scoring system. Scale from: 0 to 30 (higher is better). · Patients with rheumatoid shoulder
Surgical interventions for the rheumatoid shoulder (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 39 participantsLow
Augmented subscapularis transposition vs subscapularis transposition alone during total shoulder arthroplasty
Function The Hospital for Special Surgery 100‐point scoring system. Scale from: 0 to 20 (higher is better). · Patients with rheumatoid shoulder
Surgical interventions for the rheumatoid shoulder (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 39 participantsLow
Augmented subscapularis transposition vs subscapularis transposition alone during total shoulder arthroplasty
Quality of life ‐ not reported · Patients with rheumatoid shoulder
Surgical interventions for the rheumatoid shoulder (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Augmented subscapularis transposition vs subscapularis transposition alone during total shoulder arthroplasty
Range of motion The Hospital for Special Surgery 100‐point scoring system . Scale from: 0 to 25 (higher is better). · Patients with rheumatoid shoulder
Surgical interventions for the rheumatoid shoulder (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 39 participantsLow
Augmented subscapularis transposition vs subscapularis transposition alone during total shoulder arthroplasty
Infections · Patients with rheumatoid shoulder
Surgical interventions for the rheumatoid shoulder (2010) · Cochrane
OR 0.13 [0, 6.48]1 study · 39 participantsLow
Augmented subscapularis transposition vs subscapularis transposition alone during total shoulder arthroplasty
Component loosening / revisions ‐ not reported · Patients with rheumatoid shoulder
Surgical interventions for the rheumatoid shoulder (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Augmented subscapularis transposition vs subscapularis transposition alone during total shoulder arthroplasty
Other complications ‐ not reported · Patients with rheumatoid shoulder
Surgical interventions for the rheumatoid shoulder (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
% Change total body bone mineral content from baseline · patients with improving bone mineral density in children
Vitamin D supplementation for improving bone mineral density in children (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 672 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
% Change hip bone mineral density from baseline · patients with improving bone mineral density in children
Vitamin D supplementation for improving bone mineral density in children (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 639 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
% Change lumbar spine bone mineral density from baseline · patients with improving bone mineral density in children
Vitamin D supplementation for improving bone mineral density in children (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 660 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
% Change forearm bone mineral density from baseline · patients with improving bone mineral density in children
Vitamin D supplementation for improving bone mineral density in children (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 427 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Adverse events3 ‐ not reported · patients with improving bone mineral density in children
Vitamin D supplementation for improving bone mineral density in children (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Function Scales: Timed up and go test, Functional stair test and Nottingham health profile · for quadriceps strengthening pre and post total knee replacement
Surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation for quadriceps strengthening pre and post total knee replacement (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 2 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Patient Satisfaction ‐ not measured · for quadriceps strengthening pre and post total knee replacement
Surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation for quadriceps strengthening pre and post total knee replacement (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Pain ‐ not measured · for quadriceps strengthening pre and post total knee replacement
Surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation for quadriceps strengthening pre and post total knee replacement (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Quadriceps strength · for quadriceps strengthening pre and post total knee replacement
Surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation for quadriceps strengthening pre and post total knee replacement (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 2 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Quadriceps activation · for quadriceps strengthening pre and post total knee replacement
Surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation for quadriceps strengthening pre and post total knee replacement (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 34 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Adverse effects ‐ burns, skin damage, or cardiac arrhythmias ‐ not measured · for quadriceps strengthening pre and post total knee replacement
Surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation for quadriceps strengthening pre and post total knee replacement (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Pain intensity Various validated pain scales · Patients with osteoarthritis of the knee
Joint lavage for osteoarthritis of the knee (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted7 studies · 567 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Pain intensity Various validated pain scales · Patients with osteoarthritis of the knee
Joint lavage for osteoarthritis of the knee (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 380 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Function Various validated function scales. · Patients with osteoarthritis of the knee
Joint lavage for osteoarthritis of the knee (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 540 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Function Various validated function scales. · Patients with osteoarthritis of the knee
Joint lavage for osteoarthritis of the knee (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 381 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Number of patients experiencing adverse events · Patients with osteoarthritis of the knee
Joint lavage for osteoarthritis of the knee (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Number of patients who withdrew due to adverse event · Patients with osteoarthritis of the knee
Joint lavage for osteoarthritis of the knee (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 8 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Number of patients experiencing any serious adverse event · Patients with osteoarthritis of the knee
Joint lavage for osteoarthritis of the knee (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 98 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
ACR‐50 · patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Balance training (proprioceptive training) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Pain · patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Balance training (proprioceptive training) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
DAS (low or remission) · patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Balance training (proprioceptive training) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
HAQ for function · patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Balance training (proprioceptive training) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Gait · patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Balance training (proprioceptive training) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Adverse effects · patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Balance training (proprioceptive training) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Discontinuation rates · patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Balance training (proprioceptive training) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Pain level Verbal pain scale. Scale from: 0 to 10. ( · patients with big toe joint osteoarthritis
Interventions for treating osteoarthritis of the big toe joint (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 20 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Physical Function ‐ not measured · patients with big toe joint osteoarthritis
Interventions for treating osteoarthritis of the big toe joint (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Adverse effects ( · patients with big toe joint osteoarthritis
Interventions for treating osteoarthritis of the big toe joint (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty vs Hemiarthroplasty
Pain (Visual Analog Scale) Visual Analog Scale. Scale from: 0 to 100 (Lower is better). · patients with Shoulder osteoarthritis
Surgery for shoulder osteoarthritis (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 41 participantsLow
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty vs Hemiarthroplasty
Disability/Function (ASES) American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score. Scale from: 0 to 100 (Higher is better). · patients with Shoulder osteoarthritis
Surgery for shoulder osteoarthritis (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 88 participantsModerate
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty vs Hemiarthroplasty
Adverse Events‐Total (Intra‐operative and post‐operative) · patients with Shoulder osteoarthritis
Surgery for shoulder osteoarthritis (2010) · Cochrane
RR 1.19 [0.37, 3.81]1 study · 41 participantsModerate
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty vs Hemiarthroplasty
Revision Rate · patients with Shoulder osteoarthritis
Surgery for shoulder osteoarthritis (2010) · Cochrane
RR 6.18 [0.77, 49.52]2 studies · 88 participantsModerate
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty vs Hemiarthroplasty
Serious Adverse Events4 · patients with Shoulder osteoarthritis
Surgery for shoulder osteoarthritis (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 5 participantsUngraded
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty vs Hemiarthroplasty
Withdrawals due to adverse event · patients with Shoulder osteoarthritis
Surgery for shoulder osteoarthritis (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 5 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Pain (0‐10 cm visual analog scale)‐ Pain at 6‐12 weeks Visual Analog or Verbal Rating Scale. Scale from: 0 to 10. ( · patients with shoulder pain
Botulinum toxin for shoulder pain (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 76 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Number of Adverse Events (AEs) ( · patients with shoulder pain
Botulinum toxin for shoulder pain (2010) · Cochrane
RR 1.46 [0.64, 3.36]3 studies · 65 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Disability/function ‐ not reported · patients with shoulder pain
Botulinum toxin for shoulder pain (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
WIthdrawals due to Adverse Events ‐ not reported · patients with shoulder pain
Botulinum toxin for shoulder pain (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Serious Adverse Events ‐ not reported · patients with shoulder pain
Botulinum toxin for shoulder pain (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg + MTX/DMARD vs placebo + MTX/DMARD
ACR50% improvement criteria · patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Tocilizumab for rheumatoid arthritis (2010) · Cochrane
RR 3.17 [2.72, 3.67]4 studies · 2063 participantsHigh