Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

2,280 questions in 114 reviews · Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders

current versions
No studies 856 · 37.5%Ungraded 58 · 2.5%Very low 550 · 24.1%Low 502 · 22%Moderate 271 · 11.9%High 43 · 1.9%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Summary of findings ‐ DVD plus information booklet vs information booklet alone
Family adjustment · adults and children with hemophilia
Psychological interventions for people with hemophilia (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings ‐ computerised learning vs no intervention
Mood or personal well‐being: self‐efficacy (General Self‐Efficacy Scale of Sherer, 5 question scale of Lee) · adults and children with hemophilia
Psychological interventions for people with hemophilia (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 87 participantsVery low
Summary of findings ‐ computerised learning vs no intervention
Coping strategies: disease specific knowledge, practical skills, self management ability and transition readiness · adults and children with hemophilia
Psychological interventions for people with hemophilia (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 47 participantsLow
Vitamin D vs placebo
Serum 25(OH)D level (change from baseline) · people with sickle cell disease
Vitamin D supplementation for sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 37 participantsModerate
Vitamin D 100,000 IU/month vs 12,000 IU/month
Adverse events · people with sickle cell disease
Vitamin D supplementation for sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 62 participantsLow
Vitamin D 100,000 IU/month vs 12,000 IU/month
Presence of pain · people with sickle cell disease
Vitamin D supplementation for sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1 [0.62, 1.62]1 study · 62 participantsModerate
Vitamin D 100,000 IU/month vs 12,000 IU/month
Acute chest syndrome · people with sickle cell disease
Vitamin D supplementation for sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 62 participantsModerate
Vitamin D 100,000 IU/month vs 12,000 IU/month
Respiratory infections · people with sickle cell disease
Vitamin D supplementation for sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 62 participantsModerate
Vitamin D 100,000 IU/month vs 12,000 IU/month
HRQoL (using a validated scale) · people with sickle cell disease
Vitamin D supplementation for sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Vitamin D vs placebo
Total body BMD measured by DEXA (% change from baseline) · people with sickle cell disease
Vitamin D supplementation for sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Vitamin D vs placebo
Adverse events · people with sickle cell disease
Vitamin D supplementation for sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
RR 3.16 [0.14, 72.84]1 study · 37 participantsLow
Vitamin D vs placebo
Frequency of pain (change from baseline) · people with sickle cell disease
Vitamin D supplementation for sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 37 participantsLow
Vitamin D vs placebo
Acute chest syndrome · people with sickle cell disease
Vitamin D supplementation for sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Vitamin D vs placebo
Respiratory infections · people with sickle cell disease
Vitamin D supplementation for sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Vitamin D vs placebo
HRQoL score (physical functioning) (change from baseline) · people with sickle cell disease
Vitamin D supplementation for sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 37 participantsLow
Vitamin D 100,000 IU/month vs 12,000 IU/month
Serum 25‐hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) level (change from baseline) (ng/mL) · people with sickle cell disease
Vitamin D supplementation for sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 57 participantsLow
Vitamin D 100,000 IU/month vs 12,000 IU/month
Total body BMD measured by DEXA (% change from baseline) · people with sickle cell disease
Vitamin D supplementation for sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Final height and change in height · people with thalassaemia (any age)
Growth hormone therapy for people with thalassaemia (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Adverse effects Oral glucose tolerance test (mg/dL) (at one year) · people with thalassaemia (any age)
Growth hormone therapy for people with thalassaemia (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 20 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Height SDS(at one year) · people with thalassaemia (any age)
Growth hormone therapy for people with thalassaemia (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 20 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Change in height SDS (difference between baseline and final visit at one year) · people with thalassaemia (any age)
Growth hormone therapy for people with thalassaemia (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 20 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Height velocity (cm/year) · people with thalassaemia (any age)
Growth hormone therapy for people with thalassaemia (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 20 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Height velocity SDS · people with thalassaemia (any age)
Growth hormone therapy for people with thalassaemia (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 20 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Change in height velocity SDS (difference between baseline and final visit at one year) · people with thalassaemia (any age)
Growth hormone therapy for people with thalassaemia (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 20 participantsModerate
Long‐term RBC transfusion vs standard care
Proportion of participants developing new or progressive SCI lesions · prevention of SCI in people with SCD and normal TCD velocities
Interventions for preventing silent cerebral infarcts in people with sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.7 [0.23, 2.13]1 study · 196 participantsLow
Long‐term RBC transfusion vs standard care
SCD ‐ related SAEs ‐ ACS · prevention of SCI in people with SCD and abnormal TCD velocities
Interventions for preventing silent cerebral infarcts in people with sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.3 [0.11, 0.87]1 study · 130 participantsLow
Long‐term RBC transfusion vs standard care
SCD‐related SAEs ‐ pain crisis · prevention of SCI in people with SCD and abnormal TCD velocities
Interventions for preventing silent cerebral infarcts in people with sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.9 [0.44, 1.86]1 study · 130 participantsVery low
Long‐term RBC transfusion vs standard care
Clinical stroke · prevention of SCI in people with SCD and abnormal TCD velocities
Interventions for preventing silent cerebral infarcts in people with sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.1 [0.01, 0.73]1 study · 130 participantsLow
Long‐term RBC transfusion vs standard care
Cognitive function ‐ not reported · prevention of SCI in people with SCD and abnormal TCD velocities
Interventions for preventing silent cerebral infarcts in people with sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Long‐term RBC transfusion vs standard care
Quality of life ‐ not reported · prevention of SCI in people with SCD and abnormal TCD velocities
Interventions for preventing silent cerebral infarcts in people with sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Long‐term RBC transfusions vs standard care
SCD ‐ related SAEs ‐ ACS · SCD‐related SAEs and clinical stroke in people with SCD at risk of stroke and no previous long‐term RBC transfusions
Interventions for preventing silent cerebral infarcts in people with sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.24 [0.12, 0.49]2 studies · 326 participantsLow
Long‐term RBC transfusions vs standard care
SCD‐related SAEs ‐ pain crisis · SCD‐related SAEs and clinical stroke in people with SCD at risk of stroke and no previous long‐term RBC transfusions
Interventions for preventing silent cerebral infarcts in people with sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.63 [0.42, 0.95]2 studies · 326 participantsLow
Long‐term RBC transfusions vs standard care
Clinical stroke · SCD‐related SAEs and clinical stroke in people with SCD at risk of stroke and no previous long‐term RBC transfusions
Interventions for preventing silent cerebral infarcts in people with sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.12 [0.03, 0.49]2 studies · 326 participantsModerate
Transfusions continued vs transfusions halted
Proportion of participants developing new or progressive SCI lesions · prevention of SCI in people with SCD and normalised TCD velocities
Interventions for preventing silent cerebral infarcts in people with sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.29 [0.09, 0.97]1 study · 77 participantsLow
Transfusions continued vs transfusions halted
All‐cause mortality · prevention of SCI in people with SCD and normalised TCD velocities
Interventions for preventing silent cerebral infarcts in people with sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
Peto OR 8 [0.16, 404.12]1 study · 79 participantsVery low
Long‐term RBC transfusion vs standard care
All‐cause mortality · prevention of SCI in people with SCD and normal TCD velocities
Interventions for preventing silent cerebral infarcts in people with sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 196 participantsLow
Transfusions continued vs transfusions halted
Clinical stroke · prevention of SCI in people with SCD and normalised TCD velocities
Interventions for preventing silent cerebral infarcts in people with sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.22 [0.01, 4.35]1 study · 79 participantsVery low
Transfusions continued vs transfusions halted
SCD‐related SAEs ‐ ACS · prevention of SCI in people with SCD and normalised TCD velocities
Interventions for preventing silent cerebral infarcts in people with sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 79 participantsVery low
Transfusions continued vs transfusions halted
SCD‐related SAEs ‐ pain crisis · prevention of SCI in people with SCD and normalised TCD velocities
Interventions for preventing silent cerebral infarcts in people with sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 79 participantsVery low
Transfusions continued vs transfusions halted
Cognitive function ‐ not reported · prevention of SCI in people with SCD and normalised TCD velocities
Interventions for preventing silent cerebral infarcts in people with sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Transfusions continued vs transfusions halted
Quality of life ‐ not reported · prevention of SCI in people with SCD and normalised TCD velocities
Interventions for preventing silent cerebral infarcts in people with sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Hydroxyurea vs RBC transfusions
Proportion of participants developing new or progressive SCI lesions · prevention of SCI in people with SCD who have not had a stroke (primary prevention)
Interventions for preventing silent cerebral infarcts in people with sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 121 participantsVery low
Hydroxyurea vs RBC transfusions
All‐cause mortality · prevention of SCI in people with SCD who have not had a stroke (primary prevention)
Interventions for preventing silent cerebral infarcts in people with sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 1 participantsVery low
Hydroxyurea vs RBC transfusions
SCD‐related SAEs ‐ ACS · prevention of SCI in people with SCD who have not had a stroke (primary prevention)
Interventions for preventing silent cerebral infarcts in people with sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
RR 2.03 [0.39, 10.69]1 study · 121 participantsVery low
Hydroxyurea vs RBC transfusions
SCD‐related SAEs ‐ pain crisis · prevention of SCI in people with SCD who have not had a stroke (primary prevention)
Interventions for preventing silent cerebral infarcts in people with sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
RR 5.08 [0.61, 42.23]1 study · 121 participantsVery low
Hydroxyurea vs RBC transfusions
Clinical stroke · prevention of SCI in people with SCD who have not had a stroke (primary prevention)
Interventions for preventing silent cerebral infarcts in people with sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 121 participantsVery low
Long‐term RBC transfusion vs standard care
SCD ‐ related SAEs ‐ ACS · prevention of SCI in people with SCD and normal TCD velocities
Interventions for preventing silent cerebral infarcts in people with sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.2 [0.08, 0.51]1 study · 196 participantsLow
Hydroxyurea vs RBC transfusions
Cognitive function ‐ not reported · prevention of SCI in people with SCD who have not had a stroke (primary prevention)
Interventions for preventing silent cerebral infarcts in people with sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Hydroxyurea vs RBC transfusions
Quality of life ‐ not reported · prevention of SCI in people with SCD who have not had a stroke (primary prevention)
Interventions for preventing silent cerebral infarcts in people with sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Hydroxyurea vs RBC transfusion
Proportion of participants developing new or progressive SCI lesions · prevention of SCI in people with SCD who had a stroke (secondary prevention)
Interventions for preventing silent cerebral infarcts in people with sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane
Peto OR 7.28 [0.14, 366.91]1 study · 133 participantsVery low