Proportion of participants developing a new ulcer · s
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Time to occurrence of new ulcer · s
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Proportion of participants developing a new ulcer · s
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Time to occurrence of new ulcer · s
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Proportion of participants developing a new ulcer · s
Pressure ulcer prevention care bundle showed no clear difference in proportion of participants developing a new ulcer (28 days) compared with standard care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Time to occurrence of new ulcer · s
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Proportion of participants developing a new ulcer · s
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Time to occurrence of new ulcer · s
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Proportion of participants developing a new ulcer · s
It is very uncertain whether carer self‐instruction and one‐to‐one counselling changes proportion of participants developing a new ulcer (12 months) compared with self‐instruction (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Time to occurrence of new ulcer · s
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Proportion of participants developing a new ulcer · s
It is very uncertain whether home‐based training changes proportion of participants developing a new ulcer (3 months) compared with usual care (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Time to occurrence of new ulcer · s
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Proportion of participants developing a new ulcer · s
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Time to occurrence of new ulcer · s
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Treatment success as defined by the authors · UC patients
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Withdrawals due to adverse events · UC patients
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Treatment success as defined by the authors · UC patients
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Pain frequency or change in pain frequency · UC patients
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Patient‐reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS, NRS or categorical scale) · UC patients
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Withdrawals due to adverse events · UC patients
It is very uncertain whether yoga intervention changes withdrawal due to adverse events compared with no intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review