Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

1,156 questions · 1,179 findings · 198 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 250 · 21.2%GRADE not reported 43 · 3.6%Very low 236 · 20%Low 395 · 33.5%Moderate 208 · 17.6%High 47 · 4%

Betahistine vs placebo (with concurrent medication)

Significant adverse events · patients with subjective idiopathic tinnitus

1 finding from 1 review

Betahistine for tinnitus 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 59 participants
Low

Betahistine vs placebo (with concurrent medication)

Tinnitus symptom severity · patients with subjective idiopathic tinnitus

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Betahistine for tinnitus 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Betahistine vs placebo (with concurrent medication)

Depressive symptoms · patients with subjective idiopathic tinnitus

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Betahistine for tinnitus 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Betahistine vs placebo (with concurrent medication)

Symptoms of generalised anxiety · patients with subjective idiopathic tinnitus

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Betahistine for tinnitus 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Betahistine vs placebo (with concurrent medication)

Other adverse effects (yes or no) · patients with subjective idiopathic tinnitus

1 finding from 1 review

Betahistine for tinnitus 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 59 participants
Moderate

Surgery vs oral medication

Control of bleeding (cure or improvement to acceptable level) At 2 years · women with heavy menstrual bleeding

Surgery probably leads to higher control of bleeding (cure or improvement to acceptable level) At 4… compared with oral medication (moderate certainty).

3 findings from 1 review

Surgery versus medical therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 2.66 [1.94, 3.64]
1 study · 186 participants
Moderate
Surgery versus medical therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.29 [1.06, 1.57]
1 study · 173 participants
Low
Surgery versus medical therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.14 [0.97, 1.34]
1 study · 140 participants
Very low

Surgery vs oral medication

Overall satisfaction with treatment At 2 years · women with heavy menstrual bleeding

Surgery probably leads to higher overall satisfaction with treatment At 2 years compared with oral medication (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery versus medical therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.4 [1.13, 1.74]
1 study · 173 participants
Moderate

Surgery vs oral medication

Overall satisfaction with treatment At 5 years · women with heavy menstrual bleeding

It is very uncertain whether surgery changes overall satisfaction with treatment At 5 years compared with oral medication (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery versus medical therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.13 [0.94, 1.37]
1 study · 141 participants
Very low

Surgery vs oral medication

Adverse events at 4 months · women with heavy menstrual bleeding

Surgery probably leads to lower adverse events at 4 months compared with oral medication (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery versus medical therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.26 [0.15, 0.46]
1 study · 186 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

Behavioural outcome: adherence to laboratory tests ATCS Plus or IVR versus no intervention or usual care · patients with various conditions or at risk of low adherence to medication or laboratory tests

1 finding from 1 review

Automated telephone communication systems for preventive healthcare and management of long‐term conditions 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 15218 participants
GRADE not reported

Intervention not reported

Clinical outcome: blood pressure Multimodal/complex, ATCS Plus, IVR versus usual care · patients with various conditions or at risk of low adherence to medication or laboratory tests

1 finding from 1 review

Automated telephone communication systems for preventive healthcare and management of long‐term conditions 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 22597 participants
GRADE not reported

Intervention not reported

Adverse outcome: unintended adverse events attributable to the intervention Multimodal/complex intervention, ATCS Plus, IVR, unidirectional versus various controls · patients with various conditions or at risk of low adherence to medication or laboratory tests

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Automated telephone communication systems for preventive healthcare and management of long‐term conditions 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Intravenous vs subcutaneous route

Volume of fluid infused · adults or children requiring parenteral access for infusion of fluids or medication

1 finding from 1 review

Comparison of routes for achieving parenteral access with a focus on the management of patients with Ebola virus disease 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 4 participants
Low

Intravenous vs subcutaneous route

Insertion failures · adults or children requiring parenteral access for infusion of fluids or medication

Intravenous probably leads to higher insertion failures compared with subcutaneous route (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Comparison of routes for achieving parenteral access with a focus on the management of patients with Ebola virus disease 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 14.79 [2.87, 76.08]
3 studies · 238 participants
Moderate

Intravenous vs subcutaneous route

Time to infusion/placement · adults or children requiring parenteral access for infusion of fluids or medication

1 finding from 1 review

Comparison of routes for achieving parenteral access with a focus on the management of patients with Ebola virus disease 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 96 participants
Low

Intravenous vs subcutaneous route

Dislodgement of device · adults or children requiring parenteral access for infusion of fluids or medication

Intravenous may leads to higher dislodgement of device compared with subcutaneous route (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Comparison of routes for achieving parenteral access with a focus on the management of patients with Ebola virus disease 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 3.78 [1.16, 12.34]
1 study · 67 participants
Low

Intravenous vs subcutaneous route

Needlestick injuries · adults or children requiring parenteral access for infusion of fluids or medication

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Comparison of routes for achieving parenteral access with a focus on the management of patients with Ebola virus disease 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Intervention not reported

Knowledge [questionnaire (scored out of 80), measured immediately post‐intervention] · people with a health condition or nominally 'well' considering real or hypothetical clinical trial participation in cancer or psychiatric…

The intervention may leads to lower knowledge [questionnaire (scored out of 80), measured immediately… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Audio‐visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trials 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 93 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Knowledge [scored correct answer to single question, measured immediately post‐intervention] · people with a health condition or nominally 'well' considering real or hypothetical clinical trial participation in cancer or psychiatric…

The intervention showed no clear difference in knowledge [scored correct answer to single question, measured… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Audio‐visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trials 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.17 [0.96, 1.43]
1 study · 49 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Satisfaction with the information provided [single question, measured immediately post‐intervention] · people with a health condition or nominally 'well' considering real or hypothetical clinical trial participation in cancer or psychiatric…

The intervention may leads to higher satisfaction with the information provided [single question,… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Audio‐visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trials 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 3.3 [1.24, 8.78]
1 study · 44 participants
Low