Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,345 questions · 4,525 findings · 483 reviews

No studies found 1,024 · 22.6%GRADE not reported 388 · 8.6%Very low 1,172 · 25.9%Low 1,227 · 27.1%Moderate 576 · 12.7%High 138 · 3%

GnRHa treatment vs placebo or no pretreatment

Operating time · women with uterine fibroids
3 findings from 1 review

Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue vs polypropylene mesh

Repeat surgery ‐ surgery for prolapse, SUI, or mesh exposure review 1 to 3 years · women with anterior compartment pelvic organ prolapse

Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue probably leads to lower repeat surgery for prolapse, SUI or mesh exposure (1‐3 years) compared with polypropylene mesh (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue vs absorbable mesh

Repeat surgery for prolapse (stage 2 or greater) at 2 years · women with anterior compartment pelvic organ prolapse

It is very uncertain whether anterior prolapse repair: native tissue changes repeat surgery for prolapse (stage 2 or greater) at 2 years compared with absorbable mesh (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue vs polypropylene mesh

Repeat surgery for stress urinary incontinence (2 years) · women with anterior compartment pelvic organ prolapse

Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue showed no clear difference in repeat surgery for stress urinary incontinence (1‐2 years) compared with polypropylene mesh (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review