Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

2,395 questions in 172 reviews · Gut

current versions
No studies 420 · 17.5%Ungraded 60 · 2.5%Very low 821 · 34.3%Low 602 · 25.1%Moderate 397 · 16.6%High 95 · 4%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Oxaliplatin vs the same regimen including cisplatin
Progression‐free survival · people with advanced gastric cancer
Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (2017) · Cochrane
HR 0.88 [0.66, 1.19]4 studies · 1034 participantsLow
Oxaliplatin vs the same regimen including cisplatin
Treatment‐related death · people with advanced gastric cancer
Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (2017) · Cochrane
OR 0.47 [0.17, 1.3]5 studies · 1132 participantsLow
Combination vs single‐agent chemotherapy
Time to progression · people with advanced gastric cancer
Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (2017) · Cochrane
HR 0.69 [0.55, 0.87]4 studies · 720 participantsModerate
Oxaliplatin vs the same regimen including cisplatin
Treatment discontinuation due to toxicity · people with advanced gastric cancer
Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (2017) · Cochrane
OR 0.97 [0.44, 2.13]3 studies · 970 participantsVery low
Taxane‐platinum‐fluoropyrimidine combinations vs taxane‐platinum (without fluoropyrimidine)
Overall survival · people with advanced gastric cancer
Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (2017) · Cochrane
OR 0.86 [0.71, 1.06]3 studies · 482 participantsVery low
Taxane‐platinum‐fluoropyrimidine combinations vs taxane‐platinum (without fluoropyrimidine)
Tumour response · people with advanced gastric cancer
Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (2017) · Cochrane
OR 2.08 [1.37, 3.15]3 studies · 482 participantsLow
Taxane‐platinum‐fluoropyrimidine combinations vs taxane‐platinum (without fluoropyrimidine)
Progression‐free survival · people with advanced gastric cancer
Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (2017) · Cochrane
OR 0.74 [0.59, 0.93]3 studies · 482 participantsModerate
Taxane‐platinum‐fluoropyrimidine combinations vs taxane‐platinum (without fluoropyrimidine)
Treatment‐related death · people with advanced gastric cancer
Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (2017) · Cochrane
OR 1.95 [0.73, 5.17]3 studies · 482 participantsVery low
Taxane‐platinum‐fluoropyrimidine combinations vs taxane‐platinum (without fluoropyrimidine)
Treatment discontinuation due to toxicity · people with advanced gastric cancer
Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (2017) · Cochrane
OR 1.71 [0.79, 3.69]2 studies · 234 participantsVery low
S‐1 vs 5‐FU‐containing regimens
Overall Survival · people with advanced gastric cancer
Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (2017) · Cochrane
HR 0.91 [0.83, 1]4 studies · 1793 participantsHigh
S‐1 vs 5‐FU‐containing regimens
Tumour response · people with advanced gastric cancer
Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (2017) · Cochrane
OR 1.73 [1.01, 2.94]7 studies · 1753 participantsVery low
S‐1 vs 5‐FU‐containing regimens
Progression‐free survival · people with advanced gastric cancer
Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (2017) · Cochrane
HR 0.85 [0.7, 1.04]4 studies · 1942 participantsLow
S‐1 vs 5‐FU‐containing regimens
Time‐to treatment failure · people with advanced gastric cancer
Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (2017) · Cochrane
HR 0.88 [0.76, 1.01]5 studies · 1818 participantsLow
Combination vs single‐agent chemotherapy
Treatment‐related death · people with advanced gastric cancer
Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (2017) · Cochrane
OR 1.64 [0.83, 3.24]18 studies · 3876 participantsModerate
S‐1 vs 5‐FU‐containing regimens
Treatment‐related deaths · people with advanced gastric cancer
Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (2017) · Cochrane
OR 0.56 [0.3, 1.06]4 studies · 1962 participantsModerate
S‐1 vs 5‐FU‐containing regimens
Treatment discontinuation due to toxicity · people with advanced gastric cancer
Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (2017) · Cochrane
OR 0.85 [0.63, 1.13]3 studies · 1726 participantsHigh
5‐FU/cisplatin/anthracycline combinations vs 5‐FU/cisplatin combinations (without anthracyclines)
Overall survival · people with advanced gastric cancer
Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (2017) · Cochrane
HR 0.74 [0.61, 0.89]4 studies · 579 participantsModerate
5‐FU/cisplatin/anthracycline combinations vs 5‐FU/cisplatin combinations (without anthracyclines)
Tumour response · people with advanced gastric cancer
Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (2017) · Cochrane
OR 2.86 [1.14, 7.16]1 study · 78 participantsLow
5‐FU/cisplatin/anthracycline combinations vs 5‐FU/cisplatin combinations (without anthracyclines)
Time to progression · people with advanced gastric cancer
Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (2017) · Cochrane
HR 0.62 [0.38, 0.98]1 study · 78 participantsLow
Metronidazole vs vancomycin
Symptomatic cure with all exclusions treated as failures · patients with Clostridium difficile‐associated diarrhoea in adults
Antibiotic treatment for Clostridium difficile‐associated diarrhoea in adults (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.9 [0.84, 0.97]4 studies · 872 participantsModerate
Metronidazole vs vancomycin
Bacteriologic cure · patients with Clostridium difficile‐associated diarrhoea in adults
Antibiotic treatment for Clostridium difficile‐associated diarrhoea in adults (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.85 [0.62, 1.17]2 studies · 163 participantsVery low
Metronidazole vs vancomycin
Cure (combined symptomatic and bacteriologic cure) ‐ mild disease · patients with Clostridium difficile‐associated diarrhoea in adults
Antibiotic treatment for Clostridium difficile‐associated diarrhoea in adults (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.88 [0.71, 1.09]1 study · 90 participantsVery low
Metronidazole vs vancomycin
Cure (combined symptomatic and bacteriologic cure) ‐ severe disease · patients with Clostridium difficile‐associated diarrhoea in adults
Antibiotic treatment for Clostridium difficile‐associated diarrhoea in adults (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.74 [0.52, 1.04]1 study · 82 participantsVery low
Teicoplanin vs vancomycin
Symptomatic Cure · patients with Clostridium difficile‐associated diarrhoea in adults
Antibiotic treatment for Clostridium difficile‐associated diarrhoea in adults (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.21 [1, 1.46]2 studies · 110 participantsVery low
Teicoplanin vs vancomycin
Bacteriologic Cure · patients with Clostridium difficile‐associated diarrhoea in adults
Antibiotic treatment for Clostridium difficile‐associated diarrhoea in adults (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.82 [1.19, 2.78]1 study · 59 participantsVery low
Fidaxomicin vs vancomycin
Symptomatic Cure · patients with Clostridium difficile‐associated diarrhoea in adults
Antibiotic treatment for Clostridium difficile‐associated diarrhoea in adults (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.17 [1.07, 1.27]2 studies · 1164 participantsModerate
Bacitracin vs vancomycin
Symptomatic Cure · patients with Clostridium difficile‐associated diarrhoea in adults
Antibiotic treatment for Clostridium difficile‐associated diarrhoea in adults (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.58 [0.34, 0.99]2 studies · 104 participantsVery low
Probiotics vs control
Incidence CDAD: complete case · preventing C. difficile associated diarrhea
Probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile‐associated diarrhea in adults and children (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.4 [0.3, 0.52]31 studies · 8672 participantsModerate
Probiotics vs control
Length of Hospital Stay: complete case · preventing C. difficile associated diarrhea
Probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile‐associated diarrhea in adults and children (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 3484 participantsModerate
Probiotics vs control
CDAD (baseline risk 0‐2%) · preventing C. difficile associated diarrhea
Probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile‐associated diarrhea in adults and children (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.77 [0.45, 1.32]15 studies · 5845 participantsModerate
Probiotics vs control
CDAD (baseline risk 3‐5%) · preventing C. difficile associated diarrhea
Probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile‐associated diarrhea in adults and children (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.53 [0.16, 1.77]3 studies · 373 participantsLow
Probiotics vs control
CDAD (baseline risk >5%) · preventing C. difficile associated diarrhea
Probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile‐associated diarrhea in adults and children (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.3 [0.21, 0.42]13 studies · 2454 participantsModerate
Probiotics vs control
Incidence of C. difficile infection: complete case · preventing C. difficile associated diarrhea
Probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile‐associated diarrhea in adults and children (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.86 [0.67, 1.1]15 studies · 1214 participantsModerate
Probiotics vs control
Adverse Events: complete case · preventing C. difficile associated diarrhea
Probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile‐associated diarrhea in adults and children (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.83 [0.71, 0.97]32 studies · 8305 participantsVery low
Probiotics vs control
Incidence AAD: complete case · preventing C. difficile associated diarrhea
Probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile‐associated diarrhea in adults and children (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.58 [0.48, 0.7]33 studies · 8870 participantsLow
Probiotics vs control
AAD (Adults) · preventing C. difficile associated diarrhea
Probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile‐associated diarrhea in adults and children (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.62 [0.51, 0.76]23 studies · 7036 participantsLow
Probiotics vs control
AAD (Children) · preventing C. difficile associated diarrhea
Probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile‐associated diarrhea in adults and children (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.38 [0.29, 0.49]6 studies · 1141 participantsModerate
Bismuth subsalicylate vs placebo
Clinical response · patients with active lymphocytic colitis
Interventions for treating lymphocytic colitis (2017) · Cochrane
RR 5.25 [0.94, 1.9]1 study · 5 participantsVery low
Bismuth subsalicylate vs placebo
Histological response · patients with active lymphocytic colitis
Interventions for treating lymphocytic colitis (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.33 [0.27, 6.6]1 study · 5 participantsVery low
Budesonide vs mesalazine
Clinical response · patients with active lymphocytic colitis
Interventions for treating lymphocytic colitis (2017) · Cochrane
RR 2.03 [1.25, 3.33]2 studies · 57 participantsLow
Budesonide vs mesalazine
Histological response · patients with active lymphocytic colitis
Interventions for treating lymphocytic colitis (2017) · Cochrane
RR 2.44 [1.13, 5.28]2 studies · 39 participantsLow
Budesonide vs mesalazine
Adverse events · patients with active lymphocytic colitis
Interventions for treating lymphocytic colitis (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.67 [0.12, 3.59]1 study · 42 participantsLow
Mesalazine vs mesalazine + cholestyramine
Clinical response · patients with maintenance of remission in lymphocytic colitis
Interventions for treating lymphocytic colitis (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.99 [0.77, 1.28]1 study · 41 participantsLow
Mesalazine vs mesalazine + cholestyramine
Histological response · patients with maintenance of remission in lymphocytic colitis
Interventions for treating lymphocytic colitis (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.99 [0.77, 1.28]1 study · 41 participantsLow
Beclometasone dipropionate vs mesalazine
Clinical response at 8 weeks · Patients with active or quiescent lymphocytic colitis
Interventions for treating lymphocytic colitis (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.97 [0.75, 1.24]1 study · 46 participantsLow
Beclometasone dipropionate vs mesalazine
Maintenance of clinical response at 12 weeks · Patients with active or quiescent lymphocytic colitis
Interventions for treating lymphocytic colitis (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.29 [0.4, 4.18]1 study · 46 participantsVery low
Chemoradiotherapy vs chemoradiotherapy plus surgery
Overall survival · nonmetastatic esophageal cancer
Chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy plus surgery for esophageal cancer (2017) · Cochrane
HR 0.99 [0.79, 1.24]2 studies · 431 participantsHigh
Chemoradiotherapy vs chemoradiotherapy plus surgery
Freedom from locoregional relapse · nonmetastatic esophageal cancer
Chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy plus surgery for esophageal cancer (2017) · Cochrane
HR 0.55 [0.39, 0.76]2 studies · 431 participantsModerate
Chemoradiotherapy vs chemoradiotherapy plus surgery
Quality of Life · nonmetastatic esophageal cancer
Chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy plus surgery for esophageal cancer (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 165 participantsVery low
Chemoradiotherapy vs chemoradiotherapy plus surgery
Treatment‐related mortality · nonmetastatic esophageal cancer
Chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy plus surgery for esophageal cancer (2017) · Cochrane
RR 5.11 [1.74, 15.02]2 studies · 431 participantsLow