evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,741 questions · 1,821 findings · 207 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 297 · 16.3%GRADE not reported 191 · 10.5%Very low 333 · 18.3%Low 466 · 25.6%Moderate 414 · 22.7%High 120 · 6.6%

Summary of findings ‐ triple therapy: elexacaftor‐tezacaftor‐ivacaftor vs control (ivacaftor alone or tezacaftor plus ivacaftor)

Survival · adults and children aged 12 years and over with cystic fibrosis and either F508del/gating variant or F508del/residual function genotype
1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings ‐ triple therapy: elexacaftor‐tezacaftor‐ivacaftor vs control (ivacaftor alone or tezacaftor plus ivacaftor)

Quality of life: total score · adults and children aged 12 years and over with cystic fibrosis and either F508del/gating variant or F508del/residual function genotype

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings ‐ triple therapy: elexacaftor‐tezacaftor‐ivacaftor vs control (ivacaftor alone or tezacaftor plus ivacaftor)

Quality of life: CFQ‐R respiratory domain: absolute change from baseline · adults and children aged 12 years and over with cystic fibrosis and either F508del/gating variant or F508del/residual function genotype

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings ‐ triple therapy: elexacaftor‐tezacaftor‐ivacaftor vs control (ivacaftor alone or tezacaftor plus ivacaftor)

FEV1 % predicted: relative change from baseline · adults and children aged 12 years and over with cystic fibrosis and either F508del/gating variant or F508del/residual function genotype

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings ‐ triple therapy: elexacaftor‐tezacaftor‐ivacaftor vs control (ivacaftor alone or tezacaftor plus ivacaftor)

FEV1 % predicted: absolute change from baseline · adults and children aged 12 years and over with cystic fibrosis and either F508del/gating variant or F508del/residual function genotype
1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings ‐ triple therapy: elexacaftor‐tezacaftor‐ivacaftor vs control (ivacaftor alone or tezacaftor plus ivacaftor)

Adverse events ‐ treatment emergent · adults and children aged 12 years and over with cystic fibrosis and either F508del/gating variant or F508del/residual function genotype

Summary of findings ‐ triple therapy: elexacaftor‐tezacaftor‐ivacaftor showed no clear difference in adverse events: number of participants with treatment‐emergent… compared with control (ivacaftor alone or tezacaftor plus ivacaftor) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings ‐ triple therapy: elexacaftor‐tezacaftor‐ivacaftor vs control (ivacaftor alone or tezacaftor plus ivacaftor)

Time to first pulmonary exacerbation · adults and children aged 12 years and over with cystic fibrosis and either F508del/gating variant or F508del/residual function genotype

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Brief intervention vs brief advice, information, or assessment only

Harmful alcohol use · people with hazardous or harmful alcohol consumption
2 findings from 1 review

Any Psychosocial intervention plus pharm vs psychosocial interventions

Harmful alcohol use · alcohol use disorder
2 findings from 1 review

Any Psychosocial intervention plus pharm vs psychosocial interventions

Retention [ · alcohol use disorder

Pharmacologic intervention along with psychosocial intervention showed no clear difference in retention compared with psychosocial intervention alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pharmacologic intervention vs another pharmacologic intervention

Harmful alcohol use ‐ not measured · alcohol use disorder

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review