Incidence of cerebrovascular accident
It is very uncertain whether hormone replacement therapy (HRT) changes incidence of cerebrovascular accident compared with no HRT (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Myocardial infarction
It is very uncertain whether hormone replacement therapy (HRT) changes incidence of myocardial infarction compared with no HRT (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Incidence of gallstones
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Healing rate · people with diabetes and foot ulcers
Skin grafts and tissue replacements may leads to higher incidence of complete closure of the ulcer (healing rate) compared with placebo or standard care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Time to ulcer closure ‐ not reported · people with diabetes and foot ulcers
1 finding from 1 review
Total incidence of lower limb amputations · people with diabetes and foot ulcers
It is very uncertain whether skin grafts and tissue replacements changes total incidence of lower limb amputations compared with placebo or standard care (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Smoking cessation · people who smoke
Fast‐acting nicotine replacement therapy showed no clear difference in smoking cessation compared with nicotine patch (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Overall serious adverse events · people who smoke
1 finding from 1 review
Treatment withdrawal · people who smoke
It is very uncertain whether fast‐acting nicotine replacement therapy changes treatment withdrawals compared with nicotine patch (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Catheter‐related blood stream infection · any patient requiring a PIVC expected to remain in‐situ for at least 3 days
Effects of clinically‐indicated replacement showed no clear difference in catheter‐related blood stream infection (during hospitalisation) compared with routine change of peripheral intravenous catheters (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Thrombophlebitis (during hospitalisation) · any patient requiring a PIVC expected to remain in‐situ for at least 3 days
Effects of clinically‐indicated replacement showed no clear difference in thrombophlebitis (during hospitalisation) compared with routine change of peripheral intravenous catheters (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Thrombophlebitis (per device days) (during hospitalisation) · any patient requiring a PIVC expected to remain in‐situ for at least 3 days
Effects of clinically‐indicated replacement showed no clear difference in thrombophlebitis (per device days) (during hospitalisation) compared with routine change of peripheral intravenous catheters (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
All‐cause blood stream infection (during hospitalisation) · any patient requiring a PIVC expected to remain in‐situ for at least 3 days
Effects of clinically‐indicated replacement showed no clear difference in all‐cause blood stream infection (during hospitalisation) compared with routine change of peripheral intravenous catheters (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Cost of hospitalisation · any patient requiring a PIVC expected to remain in‐situ for at least 3 days
1 finding from 1 review
Infiltration (during hospitalisation) · any patient requiring a PIVC expected to remain in‐situ for at least 3 days
Effects of clinically‐indicated replacement probably leads to higher infiltration (during hospitalisation) compared with routine change of peripheral intravenous catheters (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Catheter blockage (during hospitalisation) · any patient requiring a PIVC expected to remain in‐situ for at least 3 days
Effects of clinically‐indicated replacement probably leads to higher catheter blockage (during hospitalisation) compared with routine change of peripheral intravenous catheters (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Smoking cessation · people who smoke
Preloading nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) probably leads to higher smoking cessation compared with standard‐use NRT (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Overall serious adverse events · people who smoke
Preloading nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) showed no clear difference in overall serious adverse events compared with standard‐use NRT (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Treatment withdrawal · people who smoke
It is very uncertain whether preloading nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) changes treatment withdrawals compared with standard‐use NRT (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Biochemically validated smoking cessation at the latest point in pregnancy (20 weeks' gestation or more) · Pregnant women who smoke
Nicotine replacement therapy may leads to higher biochemically validated smoking cessation at the latest point in… compared with control (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review