Sensitivity analysis, meta‐regression analysis, first part · palliative participants with esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma or gastric carcinoma
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table (sensitivity analysis): interventions… changes sensitivity analysis, meta‐regression analysis, first part compared with gastric carcinoma (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Sensitivity analysis, only esophageal and GE‐junction cancer participants · palliative participants with esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma or gastric carcinoma
Summary of findings table (sensitivity analysis): interventions… led to lower sensitivity analysis, only esophageal and GE‐junction cancer… compared with gastric carcinoma; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Sensitivity analysis, only gastric cancer participants · palliative participants with esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma or gastric carcinoma
Summary of findings table (sensitivity analysis): interventions… showed no clear difference in sensitivity analysis, only gastric cancer participants compared with gastric carcinoma; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Sensitivity analysis, meta‐regression analysis, second part · palliative participants with esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma or gastric carcinoma
Summary of findings table (sensitivity analysis): interventions… probably leads to lower sensitivity analysis, meta‐regression analysis, second part compared with gastric carcinoma (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Health‐related quality of life (SNOT‐22) (range 0 to 110) · adult patients who underwent primary endoscopic sinus surgery, with a diagnosis of recurrent acute or chronic rhinosinusitis
1 finding from 1 review
Disease severity, measured by patient‐reported symptom score (VAS) (range 0 to 100) · adult patients who underwent primary endoscopic sinus surgery, with a diagnosis of recurrent acute or chronic rhinosinusitis
1 finding from 1 review
Significant adverse effects: significant bleeding requiring intervention, severe pain, iatrogenic injury · adult patients who underwent primary endoscopic sinus surgery, with a diagnosis of recurrent acute or chronic rhinosinusitis
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adhesion rate · adult patients who underwent primary endoscopic sinus surgery, with a diagnosis of recurrent acute or chronic rhinosinusitis
Sinonasal debridement may leads to lower adhesion rate compared with no debridement (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Rate of revision surgeries · adult patients who underwent primary endoscopic sinus surgery, with a diagnosis of recurrent acute or chronic rhinosinusitis
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Failure to maintain clinical or endoscopic remission · Patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis
Oral 5‐aminosalicylic acid showed no clear difference in failure to maintain clinical or endoscopic remission compared with comparator 5‐aminosalicylic acid formulation (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Failure to adhere to medication regimen · Patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse event · Patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis
Oral 5‐aminosalicylic acid showed no clear difference in adverse event compared with comparator 5‐aminosalicylic acid formulation (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events · Patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis
Oral 5‐aminosalicylic acid showed no clear difference in serious adverse events compared with comparator 5‐aminosalicylic acid formulation (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Withdrawals due to adverse events · Patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis
It is very uncertain whether oral 5‐aminosalicylic acid changes withdrawal due to adverse events compared with comparator 5‐aminosalicylic acid formulation (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Exclusion/withdrawal after entry · Patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis
Oral 5‐aminosalicylic acid showed no clear difference in exclusion/withdrawal after entry compared with comparator 5‐aminosalicylic acid formulation (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Functional success, defined as the relief of epiphora · nasolacrimal duct obstruction
Mitomycin C dacryocystorhinostomy showed no clear difference in functional success, defined as the relief of epiphora compared with dacryocystorhinostomy alone (low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Anatomic success, defined as patency to lacrimal irrigation · nasolacrimal duct obstruction
Mitomycin C dacryocystorhinostomy showed no clear difference in anatomic success, defined as patency to lacrimal irrigation compared with dacryocystorhinostomy alone (low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Ostium size on nasal endoscopy · nasolacrimal duct obstruction
Mitomycin C dacryocystorhinostomy showed no clear difference in ostium size on nasal endoscopy compared with dacryocystorhinostomy alone (low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Growth during the first month of life · preterm born neonates
3 findings from 1 review
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported
no estimate extracted
1 study · 21 participants
Low
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 87 participants
Low
Discharge weight · preterm born neonates
1 finding from 1 review