Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

113 questions · 125 findings · 25 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 23 · 18.4%GRADE not reported 3 · 2.4%Very low 26 · 20.8%Low 41 · 32.8%Moderate 31 · 24.8%High 1 · 0.8%

Environmental interventions vs no intervention

Cognitive and neurobehavioural outcomes · children (aged 0–6 years)

1 finding from 1 review

Household interventions for secondary prevention of domestic lead exposure in children 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 224 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Brief interventions · people who smoke and are involved in the care of young children (birth to 12 years of age)

1 finding from 1 review

Family and carer smoking control programmes for reducing children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 218 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Brief interventions · people who smoke and are involved in the care of young children (birth to 12 years of age)

1 finding from 1 review

Family and carer smoking control programmes for reducing children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 100 participants
Very low

CRISIS INTERVENTION vs usual care

Mental state · patients with people with severe mental illnesses

1 finding from 1 review

Crisis intervention for people with severe mental illnesses 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 248 participants
Low

Brief psychotherapeutic intervention vs usual care

Reduction in physical signs As assessed by SDQ‐20 (lower is better) · people with conversion disorder according to DSM‐IV or ICD‐10 criteria

It is very uncertain whether brief psychotherapeutic intervention changes reduction in physical signs As assessed by SDQ‐20 (lower is better) compared with standard care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Psychosocial interventions for conversion and dissociative disorders in adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.12 [0.01, 2]
1 study · 19 participants
Very low

Brief psychotherapeutic intervention vs usual care

Level of functioning · people with conversion disorder according to DSM‐IV or ICD‐10 criteria

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychosocial interventions for conversion and dissociative disorders in adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Brief psychotherapeutic intervention vs usual care

Quality of life As assessed by SF‐36 (lower is better) · people with conversion disorder according to DSM‐IV or ICD‐10 criteria

1 finding from 1 review

Psychosocial interventions for conversion and dissociative disorders in adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 16 participants
Very low

Brief psychotherapeutic intervention vs usual care

Adverse events · people with conversion disorder according to DSM‐IV or ICD‐10 criteria

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychosocial interventions for conversion and dissociative disorders in adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Extended intervention vs no intervention or minimal intervention

Quantity of drinking (g/week) at 12 months · people with hazardous or harmful alcohol consumption

1 finding from 1 review

Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
6 studies · 1296 participants
Moderate

Extended intervention vs no intervention or minimal intervention

Frequency of drinking (no. binges/wk) at 12 months · people with hazardous or harmful alcohol consumption

1 finding from 1 review

Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 456 participants
Moderate

Extended intervention vs no intervention or minimal intervention

Frequency of drinking (no. days drinking/week) at 12 months · people with hazardous or harmful alcohol consumption

1 finding from 1 review

Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 319 participants
Moderate

Extended intervention vs no intervention or minimal intervention

Drinking Intensity · people with hazardous or harmful alcohol consumption

1 finding from 1 review

Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 158 participants
Low

Other psychosocial intervention vs usual care, brief intervention, or wait list

Harmful alcohol use · people with hazardous or harmful alcohol consumption

1 finding from 1 review

Psychosocial and pharmacologic interventions to reduce harmful alcohol use in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
12 studies · 2106 participants
Very low

Other psychosocial intervention vs usual care, brief intervention, or wait list

Retention [ · people with hazardous or harmful alcohol consumption

1 finding from 1 review

Psychosocial and pharmacologic interventions to reduce harmful alcohol use in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
9 studies · 1664 participants
Very low

Brief advocacy interventions for women who experience intimate partner abuse vs (Optimised) usual care

Sexual abuse CTS sexual abuse single‐item mean change from baseline · women with intimate partner abuse

1 finding from 1 review

Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well‐being of women… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 110 participants
Moderate

Brief advocacy interventions for women who experience intimate partner abuse vs (Optimised) usual care

Emotional abuse (dichotomous outcome) · women with intimate partner abuse

1 finding from 1 review

Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well‐being of women… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 558 participants
Low

Brief advocacy interventions for women who experience intimate partner abuse vs (Optimised) usual care

Emotional abuse CTS mean change from baseline · women with intimate partner abuse

1 finding from 1 review

Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well‐being of women… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 110 participants
Moderate

Brief advocacy interventions for women who experience intimate partner abuse vs (Optimised) usual care

Overall abuse Index of Spouse Abuse (ISA) score. Scale from 0 to 30 · women with intimate partner abuse

1 finding from 1 review

Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well‐being of women… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 53 participants
Low

Brief advocacy interventions for women who experience intimate partner abuse vs (Optimised) usual care

Physical abuse (dichotomous outcome) · women with intimate partner abuse

1 finding from 1 review

Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well‐being of women… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 558 participants
Moderate

Brief advocacy interventions for women who experience intimate partner abuse vs (Optimised) usual care

Physical abuse by severity ‐ severe Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS) mean change from baseline · women with intimate partner abuse

1 finding from 1 review

Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well‐being of women… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 110 participants
Moderate