Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

149 questions · 167 findings · 20 reviews

No studies found 36 · 21.6%GRADE not reported 39 · 23.4%Very low 54 · 32.3%Low 33 · 19.8%Moderate 5 · 3%High 0 · 0%

Summary of findings table ‐ Pseudophakia vs aphakia

Visual axis opacification · children younger than two years of age with bilateral congenital cataracts

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Pseudophakia changes visual axis opacification compared with aphakia (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Pseudophakia vs aphakia

Glaucoma at 5 years · children younger than two years of age with bilateral congenital cataracts

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Pseudophakia changes glaucoma at 5 years compared with aphakia (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

ISBCS vs DSBCS

Proportion of participants with endophthalmitis · people with bilateral age‐related cataracts (NRSs)
2 findings from 1 review

ISBCS vs DSBCS

Complications · people with bilateral age‐related cataracts (NRSs)

It is very uncertain whether ISBCS changes complications compared with DSBCS (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

ISBCS vs DSBCS

Total costs per QALY · people with bilateral age‐related cataracts (NRSs)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

ISBCS vs DSBCS

BCDVA · people with bilateral age‐related cataracts (NRSs)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

ISBCS vs DSBCS

Patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) · people with bilateral age‐related cataracts (NRSs)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

ISBCS vs DSBCS

Refraction NOT within 1.0 dioptres of target · people with bilateral age‐related cataracts (NRSs)

ISBCS showed no clear difference in refraction NOT within 1.0 dioptres of target compared with DSBCS (moderate certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy vs bilateral neck exploration

Success rate (eucalcaemia) (a)

It is very uncertain whether minimally invasive parathyroidectomy changes success rate (eucalcaemia) (a) compared with bilateral neck exploration (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy vs bilateral neck exploration

Adverse effects: perioperative complications (number of events)

Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy may leads to lower total incidence of perioperative adverse events (number) compared with bilateral neck exploration (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review