Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

75 questions · 89 findings · 3 reviews · Stroke

No studies found 41 · 46.1%GRADE not reported 1 · 1.1%Very low 28 · 31.5%Low 7 · 7.9%Moderate 11 · 12.4%High 1 · 1.1%

tDCS vs placebo or control

Dropouts, adverse events and deaths during intervention phase Numbers of dropouts, adverse events and deaths from all causes · people with stroke

tDCS showed no clear difference in secondary outcome measure: dropouts, adverse events and deaths… compared with any type of placebo or passive control intervention (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Prism adaptation training vs control

Activities of daily living · spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other adult‐acquired non‐progressive brain injury

It is very uncertain whether prism adaptation training changes activities of daily living: immediate effects compared with any control (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Prism adaptation training vs control

Neglect outcomes: effects persisting at least 1 month post intervention · spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other adult‐acquired non‐progressive brain injury

It is very uncertain whether prism adaptation training changes neglect outcomes: effects persisting at least 1 month post… compared with any control (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

NIBS vs control

Activities of daily living · spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other adult‐acquired non‐progressive brain injury

It is very uncertain whether NIBS changes activities of daily living: effects persisting at least 1 month post… compared with any control (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

NIBS vs control

Neglect outcomes: effects persisting at least 1 month post intervention · spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other adult‐acquired non‐progressive brain injury

It is very uncertain whether NIBS changes neglect outcomes: effects persisting at least 1 month post… compared with any control (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Electrical stimulation vs control

Activities of daily living · spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other adult‐acquired non‐progressive brain injury

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

Electrical stimulation vs control

Neglect outcomes: effects persisting at least 1 month post intervention · spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other adult‐acquired non‐progressive brain injury

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture vs control

Activities of daily living · spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other adult‐acquired non‐progressive brain injury

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

Acupuncture vs control

Neglect outcomes: effects persisting at least 1 month post intervention · spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other adult‐acquired non‐progressive brain injury

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

tDCS vs placebo or control

Secondary outcome measure: mean upper extremity function at the end of the intervention periodClinical measures of upper extremity function. Scale from: 0 to infinity. · patients with improving activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning at the end of follow‐up, in people after stroke
1 finding from 1 review

tDCS vs placebo or control

Secondary outcome measure: lower extremity function at the end of · patients with improving activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning at the end of follow‐up, in people after stroke

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

tDCS vs placebo or control

Secondary outcome measure: cognitive abilities at the end of · patients with improving activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning at the end of follow‐up, in people after stroke

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

tDCS vs placebo or control

Secondary outcome measure: hemispatial neglect at the end of · patients with improving activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning at the end of follow‐up, in people after stroke

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Prism adaptation training vs control

Neglect outcomes: immediate effects · spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other adult‐acquired non‐progressive brain injury

It is very uncertain whether prism adaptation training changes neglect outcomes: immediate effects compared with any control (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review