Question · asked by 1 review

Prism adaptation training vs control: Neglect outcomes: effects persisting at least 1 month post intervention

It is very uncertain whether prism adaptation training changes neglect outcomes: effects persisting at least 1 month post… compared with any control (very low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Prism adaptation training vs any control
Neglect outcomes: effects persisting at least 1 month post intervention · spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other adult‐acquired non‐progressive brain injury
It is very uncertain whether prism adaptation training changes neglect outcomes: effects persisting at least 1 month post… compared with any control (very low certainty).
Non‐pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other… (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
SMD 0.051 study · 16 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Non‐pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other non‐progressive brain injury
2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.