Behavioural activation vs third‐wave CBT
Behavioural activation showed no clear difference in treatment efficacy up to 6 months (4‐8 weeks) compared with third‐wave CBT (low certainty).
- RR 1.1 [0.91, 1.33]2 studies · 98 participantsLow
Behavioural activation showed no clear difference in treatment efficacy up to 6 months (4‐8 weeks) compared with third‐wave CBT (low certainty).
Behavioural activation showed no clear difference in treatment acceptability up to 6 months (4‐8 weeks) compared with third‐wave CBT (low certainty).
Present‐centered therapy probably leads to lower treatment dropout compared with trauma‐focused cognitive behavioral therapy (moderate certainty).
It is very uncertain whether SUPPORTIVE THERAPY changes global state: Relapse compared with COGNITIVE BEHAVIOURAL THERAPY (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether SUPPORTIVE THERAPY changes service outcomes: Hospitalisation compared with COGNITIVE BEHAVIOURAL THERAPY (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether SUPPORTIVE THERAPY changes mental state: No clinically important improvement compared with COGNITIVE BEHAVIOURAL THERAPY (very low certainty).
SUPPORTIVE THERAPY showed no clear difference in leaving the study early compared with COGNITIVE BEHAVIOURAL THERAPY (moderate certainty).
It is very uncertain whether SUPPORTIVE THERAPY changes satisfaction with treatment: Recipient of care not satisfied with… compared with COGNITIVE BEHAVIOURAL THERAPY (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether ANY FORM OF BRIEF PSYCHOEDUCATION changes relapse: Relapse for any reason (medium term) compared with CBT (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether EMDR changes leaving study early for any reason compared with trauma‐focused CBT (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether EMDR changes leaving the study early for any reason compared with non‐TFCBT (very low certainty).