Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

3,584 questions · 3,695 findings · 567 reviews

No studies found 784 · 21.2%GRADE not reported 308 · 8.3%Very low 1,036 · 28%Low 971 · 26.3%Moderate 440 · 11.9%High 156 · 4.2%

Intrauterine infusion of autologous platelet‐rich plasma vs intrauterine infusion of granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor

Live birth or ongoing pregnancy · women undergoing assisted reproduction

It is very uncertain whether intrauterine infusion of autologous platelet‐rich plasma changes live birth (or ongoing pregnancy compared with intrauterine infusion of granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intrauterine infusion of autologous platelet‐rich plasma vs intrauterine infusion of granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor

Miscarriage · women undergoing assisted reproduction

It is very uncertain whether intrauterine infusion of autologous platelet‐rich plasma changes miscarriage compared with intrauterine infusion of granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intrauterine infusion of autologous platelet‐rich plasma vs intrauterine infusion of granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor

Clinical pregnancy · women undergoing assisted reproduction

It is very uncertain whether intrauterine infusion of autologous platelet‐rich plasma changes clinical pregnancy compared with intrauterine infusion of granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intrauterine infusion of autologous platelet‐rich plasma vs no intervention

Live birth or ongoing pregnancy · women undergoing assisted reproduction

It is very uncertain whether intrauterine injection of autologous platelet‐rich plasma changes live birth (or ongoing pregnancy) compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review