Intervention not reported
Leg pain ‒short‐term · lumbosacral radicular pain
The intervention showed no clear difference in leg pain ‒short‐term (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Disability ‒short‐term (> 2 weeks but ≤ 3 months) Disability reported using multiple scales (RMDQ and ODI). Disability scores were converted to a common 0 to 100 scale. Higher scores indicate greater disability. · lumbosacral radicular pain
The intervention showed no clear difference in disability ‒short‐term (> 2 weeks but ≤ 3 months) Disability… (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Minor adverse events** ‒short‐term (> 2 weeks but ≤ 3 months) Minor adverse events provided as the proportion of patients reporting any untoward medical occurrence after an epidural injection without hospitalisations. · lumbosacral radicular pain
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes minor adverse events** ‒short‐term (> 2 weeks but ≤ 3 months) Minor… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Major adverse events** ‒short‐term (> 2 weeks but ≤ 3 months) Major adverse events provided as the proportion of patients reporting any untoward medical occurrence after an epidural injection with hospitalizations. · lumbosacral radicular pain
1 finding from 1 review
DASH questionnaire (0 (best function) to 100 (worst function)) ‐ at 1 year · adults with acute acromioclavicular dislocation of the shouldera
1 finding from 1 review
Pain: presence of pain (slight or moderate) at 1 year · adults with acute acromioclavicular dislocation of the shouldera
It is very uncertain whether surgical intervention changes pain: presence of pain (slight or moderate) at 1 year compared with conservative intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Treatment failure requiring re‐intervention · adults with acute acromioclavicular dislocation of the shouldera
It is very uncertain whether surgical intervention changes treatment failure (usually requiring a subsequent operation) at 1 year compared with conservative intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Number of participants to return to work/sport ‐ at 1 year · adults with acute acromioclavicular dislocation of the shouldera
Surgical intervention showed no clear difference in number of participants to return to work/sport ‐ at 1 year compared with conservative intervention (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Health‐related quality of life (physical) · adults with acute acromioclavicular dislocation of the shouldera
1 finding from 1 review
Participants with adverse events at 1 year · adults with acute acromioclavicular dislocation of the shouldera
It is very uncertain whether surgical intervention changes participants with adverse events at 1 year compared with conservative intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Patient dissatisfaction with the cosmetic result at 1 yearh · adults with acute acromioclavicular dislocation of the shouldera
It is very uncertain whether surgical intervention changes patient dissatisfaction with the cosmetic result at 1 yearh compared with conservative intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Mortality one month after the start of therapy · adults presenting with elevated intracranial pressure secondary to a traumatic brain injury
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Adverse effects considered as serious by either the patient or the clinician · adults presenting with elevated intracranial pressure secondary to a traumatic brain injury
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Disability (measured by the Glasgow Outcome Scale; higher score is better) · adults presenting with elevated intracranial pressure secondary to a traumatic brain injury
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Differences in quality of life ( · adults presenting with elevated intracranial pressure secondary to a traumatic brain injury
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Subjective success (i.e. resolution of symptoms of watering following surgery) · People with nasolacrimal duct obstruction
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
5 participants
Low
Intervention not reported
Intraoperative bleeding · People with nasolacrimal duct obstruction
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low
Intervention not reported
Postoperative bleeding · People with nasolacrimal duct obstruction
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes postoperative bleeding (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Wound infection/gaping · People with nasolacrimal duct obstruction
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low
Intervention not reported
Treatment success (at 6 months) · children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO)
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Moderate