Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,173 questions in 89 reviews · Neuromuscular

current versions
No studies 302 · 25.7%Ungraded 119 · 10.1%Very low 267 · 22.8%Low 239 · 20.4%Moderate 177 · 15.1%High 69 · 5.9%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Medial epicondylectomy plus oral steroids vs oral steroids alone
Proportion of ulnar nerves with motor improvement after one year · patients with nerve damage in leprosy
Decompressive surgery for treating nerve damage in leprosy (2012) · Cochrane
RR 0.91 [0.64, 1.28]1 study · 62 participantsVery low
Medial epicondylectomy plus oral steroids vs oral steroids alone
Change in sensory score after two years · patients with nerve damage in leprosy
Decompressive surgery for treating nerve damage in leprosy (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 57 participantsVery low
Medial epicondylectomy plus oral steroids vs oral steroids alone
Change in motor score after two years · patients with nerve damage in leprosy
Decompressive surgery for treating nerve damage in leprosy (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 57 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Incidence of clinical neuropathy after 5 years: risk ratio · patients with diabetic neuropathy
Enhanced glucose control for preventing and treating diabetic neuropathy (2012) · Cochrane
RR 0.46 [0.33, 0.63]3 studies · 1228 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Annual change in vibration threshold in the feet · patients with diabetic neuropathy
Enhanced glucose control for preventing and treating diabetic neuropathy (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 99 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Death · patients with diabetic neuropathy
Enhanced glucose control for preventing and treating diabetic neuropathy (2012) · Cochrane
RR 1.26 [1.06, 1.51]1 study · 10251 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Weight gain · patients with diabetic neuropathy
Enhanced glucose control for preventing and treating diabetic neuropathy (2012) · Cochrane
RR 1.96 [1.81, 2.13]1 study · 10078 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Other adverse events · patients with diabetic neuropathy
Enhanced glucose control for preventing and treating diabetic neuropathy (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Annual change in peroneal nerve motor conduction velocity m/sec · patients with diabetic neuropathy
Enhanced glucose control for preventing and treating diabetic neuropathy (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 1371 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Annual change in median nerve motor conduction velocity · patients with diabetic neuropathy
Enhanced glucose control for preventing and treating diabetic neuropathy (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 1241 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Annual change in ulnar nerve motor conduction velocity · patients with diabetic neuropathy
Enhanced glucose control for preventing and treating diabetic neuropathy (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 134 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Annual change in vibration threshold in the feet · patients with diabetic neuropathy
Enhanced glucose control for preventing and treating diabetic neuropathy (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 177 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Adverse events · patients with diabetic neuropathy
Enhanced glucose control for preventing and treating diabetic neuropathy (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Wide 95% CI. · patients with diabetic neuropathy
Enhanced glucose control for preventing and treating diabetic neuropathy (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Annual incidence of clinical neuropathy: risk ratio · patients with diabetic neuropathy
Enhanced glucose control for preventing and treating diabetic neuropathy (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 6669 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Annual change in median nerve motor conduction velocity · patients with diabetic neuropathy
Enhanced glucose control for preventing and treating diabetic neuropathy (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 99 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
"Substantial" benefit At least 50% reduction in pain or equivalent · painful diabetic neuropathy
Lacosamide for neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia in adults (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted412 participantsLow
Intervention NR
"Moderate" benefit At least 30% reduction in pain · painful diabetic neuropathy
Lacosamide for neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia in adults (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted715 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Proportion below 30/100 mm on VAS · painful diabetic neuropathy
Lacosamide for neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia in adults (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Patient global impression much or very much improved · painful diabetic neuropathy
Lacosamide for neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia in adults (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted715 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Quality of life measure · painful diabetic neuropathy
Lacosamide for neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia in adults (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Adverse event withdrawals · painful diabetic neuropathy
Lacosamide for neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia in adults (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted874 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Serious adverse events · painful diabetic neuropathy
Lacosamide for neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia in adults (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1304 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Death · painful diabetic neuropathy
Lacosamide for neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia in adults (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted400 participantsUngraded
Ergonomic keyboard vs placebo
Short‐term overall improvement ‐ not measured · people with carpal tunnel syndrome
Ergonomic positioning or equipment for treating carpal tunnel syndrome (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Ergonomic keyboard vs placebo
Adverse effects ‐ not measured · people with carpal tunnel syndrome
Ergonomic positioning or equipment for treating carpal tunnel syndrome (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Ergonomic keyboard vs placebo
Short‐term improvement in CTS symptoms (pain) (3 months or less) ‐ At end of 12 weeks treatment (Protouch Keyboard) Scale: 0 to 10 · people with carpal tunnel syndrome
Ergonomic positioning or equipment for treating carpal tunnel syndrome (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 20 participantsVery low
Ergonomic keyboard vs placebo
Short‐term improvement in functional ability (3 months or less) (Protouch Keyboard) Scale: 13 to 65 · people with carpal tunnel syndrome
Ergonomic positioning or equipment for treating carpal tunnel syndrome (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 20 participantsVery low
Ergonomic keyboard vs placebo
Long‐term improvement in CTS symptoms (pain ) from baseline to end of 6 months treatment (Apple Adjustable Keyboard) Scale: 0 to 10 · people with carpal tunnel syndrome
Ergonomic positioning or equipment for treating carpal tunnel syndrome (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRVery low
Ergonomic keyboard vs placebo
Long‐term improvement in functional ability (> 3 months) ‐ not measured · people with carpal tunnel syndrome
Ergonomic positioning or equipment for treating carpal tunnel syndrome (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Neurodynamic mobilisation vs no treatment
Short‐term overall improvement (three months or less) · People with carpal tunnel syndrome on a waiting list for carpal tunnel release
Exercise and mobilisation interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome (2012) · Cochrane
RR 15 [1.02, 220.92]1 study · 14 participantsVery low
Neurodynamic mobilisation vs no treatment
Adverse effects · People with carpal tunnel syndrome on a waiting list for carpal tunnel release
Exercise and mobilisation interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 14 participantsVery low
Neurodynamic mobilisation vs no treatment
Short‐term improvement in CTS symptoms (VAS pain) (three months or less) Scale from: 0 to 5 · People with carpal tunnel syndrome on a waiting list for carpal tunnel release
Exercise and mobilisation interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 14 participantsVery low
Neurodynamic mobilisation vs no treatment
Short‐term improvement in functional ability or health‐related quality of life (hand function) (three months or less) · People with carpal tunnel syndrome on a waiting list for carpal tunnel release
Exercise and mobilisation interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome (2012) · Cochrane
RR 9 [0.59, 137.65]1 study · 12 participantsVery low
Neurodynamic mobilisation vs no treatment
Short‐term improvement in neurophysiologic parameters (three months or less) · People with carpal tunnel syndrome on a waiting list for carpal tunnel release
Exercise and mobilisation interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 14 participantsVery low
Neurodynamic mobilisation vs no treatment
Long‐term improvement in CTS symptoms (more than three months) · People with carpal tunnel syndrome on a waiting list for carpal tunnel release
Exercise and mobilisation interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 14 participantsVery low
Neurodynamic mobilisation vs no treatment
Long‐term improvement in functional ability or health‐related quality of life (more than three months) · People with carpal tunnel syndrome on a waiting list for carpal tunnel release
Exercise and mobilisation interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 14 participantsVery low
Neurodynamic mobilisation vs no treatment
Need for surgery · People with carpal tunnel syndrome on a waiting list for carpal tunnel release
Exercise and mobilisation interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome (2012) · Cochrane
RR 0.33 [0.1, 1.12]1 study · 14 participantsVery low
3,4‐Diaminopyridine vs placebo
Improvement in muscle strength (QMG score) Scale from: 0 to 39 · participants with Lambert‐Eaton myasthenic syndrome
Treatment for Lambert‐Eaton myasthenic syndrome (2011) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 40 participantsModerate
3,4‐Diaminopyridine vs placebo
Improvement in mean CMAP amplitude (mV) · participants with Lambert‐Eaton myasthenic syndrome
Treatment for Lambert‐Eaton myasthenic syndrome (2011) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 94 participantsHigh
3,4‐Diaminopyridine vs placebo
Adverse events · participants with Lambert‐Eaton myasthenic syndrome
Treatment for Lambert‐Eaton myasthenic syndrome (2011) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 42 participantsHigh
Vaccination vs placebo
Persistence of PHN among all subjects a numerical rating scale for pain1 · people at risk for postherpetic neuralgia
Vaccination for preventing postherpetic neuralgia (2011) · Cochrane
RR 0.31 [0.18, 0.54]1 study · 38501 participantsHigh
Vaccination vs placebo
Persistence of PHN among subjects developing herpes zoster a numerical rating scale for pain1 · people at risk for postherpetic neuralgia
Vaccination for preventing postherpetic neuralgia (2011) · Cochrane
RR 0.64 [0.38, 1.09]1 study · 957 participantsModerate
Vaccination vs placebo
Deaths among all subjects during the whole study clinical · people at risk for postherpetic neuralgia
Vaccination for preventing postherpetic neuralgia (2011) · Cochrane
RR 1 [0.91, 1.1]1 study · 38546 participantsHigh
Vaccination vs placebo
Serious adverse events among subjects in the adverse event substudy clinical manifestations · people at risk for postherpetic neuralgia
Vaccination for preventing postherpetic neuralgia (2011) · Cochrane
RR 1.53 [1.03, 2.25]1 study · 6616 participantsHigh
Night splinting vs no night splinting
Change in ankle dorsiflexion range of motion Lidcome Template in degrees. Scale from: 0.36 to 31.28. · patients with patients with reduced ankle range of motion in neuromuscular disease
Interventions for increasing ankle range of motion in patients with neuromuscular disease (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 52 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
improvement in the maintenance of wakefulness test · patients with hypersomnia (excessive daytime sleepiness) in myotonic dystrophy
Psychostimulants for hypersomnia (excessive daytime sleepiness) in myotonic dystrophy (2006) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 48 participantsLow
Intervention NR
improvement in the Epworth Sleepiness Score · patients with hypersomnia (excessive daytime sleepiness) in myotonic dystrophy
Psychostimulants for hypersomnia (excessive daytime sleepiness) in myotonic dystrophy (2006) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 101 participantsLow
Intervention NR
improvement in multiple sleep latency test · patients with hypersomnia (excessive daytime sleepiness) in myotonic dystrophy
Psychostimulants for hypersomnia (excessive daytime sleepiness) in myotonic dystrophy (2006) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 48 participantsLow
Intervention NR
quality of life scale ‐ mean improvement in total score of Short Form 36 · patients with hypersomnia (excessive daytime sleepiness) in myotonic dystrophy
Psychostimulants for hypersomnia (excessive daytime sleepiness) in myotonic dystrophy (2006) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 48 participantsLow