Cochrane · systematic review · CD009600

Ergonomic positioning or equipment for treating carpal tunnel syndrome

O'Connor, D, Page, MJ, Marshall, SC, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2012 · Cochrane Library

NeuromuscularAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
6
current version
GRADE rated
3
No studies
3
Included studies
NR
No studies 3 · 50%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 50%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Ergonomic keyboard compared with placebo for carpal tunnel syndrome

Population: people with carpal tunnel syndrome
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Short‐term overall improvement ‐ not measured
Ergonomic keyboard vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse effects ‐ not measured
Ergonomic keyboard vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Short‐term improvement in CTS symptoms (pain) (3 months or less) ‐ At end of 12 weeks treatment (Protouch Keyboard) Scale: 0 to 10
Ergonomic keyboard vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 20 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Short‐term improvement in functional ability (3 months or less) (Protouch Keyboard) Scale: 13 to 65
Ergonomic keyboard vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 20 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Long‐term improvement in CTS symptoms (pain ) from baseline to end of 6 months treatment (Apple Adjustable Keyboard) Scale: 0 to 10
Ergonomic keyboard vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Long‐term improvement in functional ability (> 3 months) ‐ not measured
Ergonomic keyboard vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies