Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,361 questions in 120 reviews · Developmental, Psychosocial and Learning Problems

current versions
No studies 286 · 21%Ungraded 61 · 4.5%Very low 381 · 28%Low 381 · 28%Moderate 228 · 16.8%High 24 · 1.8%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Brief advocacy interventions for women who experience intimate partner abuse vs usual care at up to 12‐month follow‐up
Sexual abuse CTS and Partner Abuse Scale (PAS)e · women with intimate partner abuse
Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well‐being… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 239 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Identification of IPV by health professionals (assessed immediately or up to 1 month) · women attending healthcare settings for any health‐related reason
Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted8 studies · 10074 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Identification of IPV by type of healthcare setting ‐ Antenatal clinics · women attending healthcare settings for any health‐related reason
Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 663 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Identification of IPV by type of healthcare setting ‐ Maternal health services · women attending healthcare settings for any health‐related reason
Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 829 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Identification of IPV by type of healthcare setting ‐ Emergency departments · women attending healthcare settings for any health‐related reason
Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 2608 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Identification of IPV by type of healthcare setting ‐ Hospital‐based primary care · women attending healthcare settings for any health‐related reason
Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 293 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Referrals (assessed immediately) · women attending healthcare settings for any health‐related reason
Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 1298 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Identification of IPV (non‐clinically based, assessed immediately) · women attending healthcare settings for any health‐related reason
Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 2765 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Reduce hip migration/hip problems · Children with cerebral palsy
Sleep positioning systems for children with cerebral palsy (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Effect on sleep patterns and quality · Children with cerebral palsy
Sleep positioning systems for children with cerebral palsy (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 21 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Effect on quality of life of child and family · Children with cerebral palsy
Sleep positioning systems for children with cerebral palsy (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Effect on pain · Children with cerebral palsy
Sleep positioning systems for children with cerebral palsy (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 10 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Effect on physical functioning · Children with cerebral palsy
Sleep positioning systems for children with cerebral palsy (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Adverse effects · Children with cerebral palsy
Sleep positioning systems for children with cerebral palsy (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Low‐ and middle‐income countries: Feeding vs control ‐ growth RCTs
Weight gain (kg) · Low‐ and middle‐income children aged 3 months to 5 years
Food supplementation for improving the physical and psychosocial health of socio‐economically disadvantaged… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted9 studies · 1057 participantsModerate
Low‐ and middle‐income countries: Feeding vs control. CBAs
Weight‐ for‐height: z‐scores (WHZ) · Children aged 3 months to 5 years
Food supplementation for improving the physical and psychosocial health of socio‐economically disadvantaged… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 999 participantsVery low
Low‐ and middle‐income countries: Feeding vs control ‐ psychosocial development RCTs
Mental Development Index (total) · Children aged 3 months to 5 years
Food supplementation for improving the physical and psychosocial health of socio‐economically disadvantaged… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 113 participantsModerate
Low‐ and middle‐income countries: Feeding vs control ‐ psychosocial development RCTs
Psychomotor development · Children aged 3 months to 5 years
Food supplementation for improving the physical and psychosocial health of socio‐economically disadvantaged… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 178 participantsModerate
Low‐ and middle‐income countries: Feeding vs control ‐ growth RCTs
Height gain (cm) · Low‐ and middle‐income children aged 3 months to 5 years
Food supplementation for improving the physical and psychosocial health of socio‐economically disadvantaged… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted9 studies · 1463 participantsModerate
Low‐ and middle‐income countries: Feeding vs control ‐ growth RCTs
Weight‐for‐age: z‐scores (WAZ) · Low‐ and middle‐income children aged 3 months to 5 years
Food supplementation for improving the physical and psychosocial health of socio‐economically disadvantaged… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted8 studies · 1565 participantsModerate
Low‐ and middle‐income countries: Feeding vs control ‐ growth RCTs
Height‐for‐age: z‐scores (HAZ) · Low‐ and middle‐income children aged 3 months to 5 years
Food supplementation for improving the physical and psychosocial health of socio‐economically disadvantaged… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted9 studies · 4544 participantsModerate
Low‐ and middle‐income countries: Feeding vs control ‐ growth RCTs
Weight‐for‐height: z‐scores (WHZ) · Low‐ and middle‐income children aged 3 months to 5 years
Food supplementation for improving the physical and psychosocial health of socio‐economically disadvantaged… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted7 studies · 4073 participantsModerate
Low‐ and middle‐income countries: Feeding vs control. CBAs
Weight gain (kg) · Children aged 3 months to 5 years
Food supplementation for improving the physical and psychosocial health of socio‐economically disadvantaged… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted7 studies · 1784 participantsVery low
Low‐ and middle‐income countries: Feeding vs control. CBAs
Height gain (cm) · Children aged 3 months to 5 years
Food supplementation for improving the physical and psychosocial health of socio‐economically disadvantaged… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted7 studies · 1782 participantsVery low
Low‐ and middle‐income countries: Feeding vs control. CBAs
Weight‐for‐age: z‐scores (WAZ) · Children aged 3 months to 5 years
Food supplementation for improving the physical and psychosocial health of socio‐economically disadvantaged… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 999 participantsVery low
Low‐ and middle‐income countries: Feeding vs control. CBAs
Height‐for‐age: z‐scores (HAZ) · Children aged 3 months to 5 years
Food supplementation for improving the physical and psychosocial health of socio‐economically disadvantaged… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 999 participantsVery low
L‐acetylcarnitine vs placebo
Outcomes: Behaviour or social performance · people being treated for fragile X syndrome
L‐acetylcarnitine for treating fragile X syndrome (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
L‐acetylcarnitine vs placebo
Conners' Parent Rating Scale (raw scores) · people being treated for fragile X syndrome
L‐acetylcarnitine for treating fragile X syndrome (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 17 participantsLow
L‐acetylcarnitine vs placebo
Conners' Parent Rating Scale (standardised t‐test scores) · people being treated for fragile X syndrome
L‐acetylcarnitine for treating fragile X syndrome (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 51 participantsLow
L‐acetylcarnitine vs placebo
Conners' Teacher Rating Scale (standardised t‐test scores) · people being treated for fragile X syndrome
L‐acetylcarnitine for treating fragile X syndrome (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 51 participantsLow
L‐acetylcarnitine vs placebo
Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scale: adaptive behaviour composite (standardised scores) · people being treated for fragile X syndrome
L‐acetylcarnitine for treating fragile X syndrome (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 51 participantsLow
L‐acetylcarnitine vs placebo
Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scale: socialisation domain (standardised scores) · people being treated for fragile X syndrome
L‐acetylcarnitine for treating fragile X syndrome (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 51 participantsLow
Parent‐infant psychotherapy vs control
Parent mental health meta‐analysis: depression (dichotomous data) ‐ post‐intervention Number depressed · participants with improving parental and infant mental health
Parent‐infant psychotherapy for improving parental and infant mental health (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.74 [0.52, 1.04]3 studies · 278 participantsLow
Parent‐infant psychotherapy vs other (psychoeducational) parenting intervention: parent mental health and infant attachment
Infant attachment categories meta‐analysis: post‐intervention ‐ attachment category disorganised Ainsworth Strange Situation · participants with improving parental and infant mental health
Parent‐infant psychotherapy for improving parental and infant mental health (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.79 [0.34, 1.82]1 study · 36 participantsLow
Parent‐infant psychotherapy vs other (psychoeducational) parenting intervention: parent mental health and infant attachment
Infant attachment categories meta‐analysis: · participants with improving parental and infant mental health
Parent‐infant psychotherapy for improving parental and infant mental health (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.61 [0.83, 3.12]2 studies · 136 participantsVery low
Parent‐infant psychotherapy vs other (psychoeducational) parenting intervention: parent mental health and infant attachment
Infant attachment categories meta‐analysis: · participants with improving parental and infant mental health
Parent‐infant psychotherapy for improving parental and infant mental health (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.82 [0.3, 2.22]2 studies · 136 participantsVery low
Parent‐infant psychotherapy vs control
Parent mental health meta‐analysis: depression (continuous data) ‐ post‐intervention Validated assessment scales for depression, lower scores are less depressed · participants with improving parental and infant mental health
Parent‐infant psychotherapy for improving parental and infant mental health (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 356 participantsLow
Parent‐infant psychotherapy vs control
Infant attachment categories meta‐analysis: post‐intervention ‐ attachment category (SSP) secure Ainsworth Strange Situation · participants with improving parental and infant mental health
Parent‐infant psychotherapy for improving parental and infant mental health (2015) · Cochrane
RR 8.93 [1.25, 63.7]2 studies · 168 participantsVery low
Parent‐infant psychotherapy vs control
Infant attachment categories meta‐analysis: post‐intervention ‐ attachment category (SSP) disorganised Ainsworth Strange Situation · participants with improving parental and infant mental health
Parent‐infant psychotherapy for improving parental and infant mental health (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.32 [0.17, 0.58]2 studies · 168 participantsLow
Parent‐infant psychotherapy vs control
Infant attachment categories meta‐analysis: · participants with improving parental and infant mental health
Parent‐infant psychotherapy for improving parental and infant mental health (2015) · Cochrane
RR 3.3 [1.82, 6]2 studies · 129 participantsLow
Parent‐infant psychotherapy vs control
Infant attachment categories meta‐analysis: · participants with improving parental and infant mental health
Parent‐infant psychotherapy for improving parental and infant mental health (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.8 [0.29, 2.19]2 studies · 129 participantsVery low
Parent‐infant psychotherapy vs other (psychoeducational) parenting intervention: parent mental health and infant attachment
Parent mental health meta‐analysis: depression continuous data ‐ post‐intervention Validated assessment scales for depression, lower scores are less depressed · participants with improving parental and infant mental health
Parent‐infant psychotherapy for improving parental and infant mental health (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 172 participantsVery low
Parent‐infant psychotherapy vs other (psychoeducational) parenting intervention: parent mental health and infant attachment
Parent mental health meta‐analysis: depression continuous data ‐ · participants with improving parental and infant mental health
Parent‐infant psychotherapy for improving parental and infant mental health (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 160 participantsLow
Parent‐infant psychotherapy vs other (psychoeducational) parenting intervention: parent mental health and infant attachment
Infant attachment categories meta‐analysis: post‐intervention ‐ attachment category secure Ainsworth Strange Situation · participants with improving parental and infant mental health
Parent‐infant psychotherapy for improving parental and infant mental health (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.83 [0.32, 2.13]2 studies · 102 participantsVery low
Comparison 1: donepezil vs placebo
Cognitive abilities (Severe Impairment Battery; SIB) · people with Down syndrome
Pharmacological interventions for cognitive decline in people with Down syndrome (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 165 participantsLow
Comparison 2: memantine vs placebo
Carer stress · people with Down syndrome
Pharmacological interventions for cognitive decline in people with Down syndrome (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Comparison 2: memantine vs placebo
Institutional/home care · people with Down syndrome
Pharmacological interventions for cognitive decline in people with Down syndrome (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Comparison 2: memantine vs placebo
Death · people with Down syndrome
Pharmacological interventions for cognitive decline in people with Down syndrome (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Comparison 1: donepezil vs placebo
Behavioural problems (various scales) · people with Down syndrome
Pharmacological interventions for cognitive decline in people with Down syndrome (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 157 participantsLow
Comparison 1: donepezil vs placebo
Adverse events · people with Down syndrome
Pharmacological interventions for cognitive decline in people with Down syndrome (2015) · Cochrane
OR 0.32 [0.16, 0.62]4 studies · 192 participantsLow