Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

690 questions · 711 findings · 93 reviews

No studies found 167 · 23.5%GRADE not reported 36 · 5.1%Very low 181 · 25.5%Low 202 · 28.4%Moderate 100 · 14.1%High 25 · 3.5%

Summary of findings: 3D (Tai Chi) exercise vs control (e.g. usual activities)

Falls · Older people living in the community (trials focusing on people recently discharged from hospital were not included)

Summary of findings: 3D (Tai Chi) exercise may leads to lower rate of falls (falls per person‐year) compared with control (e.g. usual activities) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: 3D (Tai Chi) exercise vs control (e.g. usual activities)

Number of people who experienced one or more falls · Older people living in the community (trials focusing on people recently discharged from hospital were not included)

Summary of findings: 3D (Tai Chi) exercise leads to lower number of people who experienced one or more falls compared with control (e.g. usual activities) (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings. Peer reviewer training vs standard journal practice or no training

Stakeholders' assessment of review quality (change score) Assessed using either:A) a 5‐point scale, change scores range from −4 to 4 (3 studies);B) a 5‐point scale, expressed by "slope of quality score change"(1 study); orC) the MQAI, from −144 to... · peer reviewers
1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: bevacizumab vs ranibizumab

Mean change in visual acuity at 1 year (number of letters) · people with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration

Summary of findings: bevacizumab showed no clear difference in mean change in visual acuity at 1 year (number of letters) compared with ranibizumab (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: bevacizumab vs ranibizumab

Reduction in central retinal thickness at one year · people with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration

Summary of findings: bevacizumab showed no clear difference in reduction in central retinal thickness at 1 year compared with ranibizumab (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: bevacizumab vs ranibizumab

No problems in quality of life domains at one year · people with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration

Summary of findings: bevacizumab showed no clear difference in no problems in quality of life domains at 1 year compared with ranibizumab (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: bevacizumab vs ranibizumab

Serious systemic adverse events at one year · people with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration

Summary of findings: bevacizumab showed no clear difference in serious systemic adverse events at 1 yearb compared with ranibizumab (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review