evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

2,355 questions · 2,459 findings · 279 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 556 · 22.6%GRADE not reported 490 · 19.9%Very low 593 · 24.1%Low 479 · 19.5%Moderate 243 · 9.9%High 98 · 4%

Highest BMI category (overweight/obese) vs Lowest BMI category (normal weight/underweight)

Early childhood caries (ECC) · Children (approx. 4-18 years)

In the Region: Asian countries subgroup, the BMI (highest vs lowest)-childhood caries association was significant (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.32; ungraded).

17 findings from 1 review
Show 14 more findings

Summary of findings table ‐ Adhesiolysis vs no surgery or diagnostic laparoscopy

Effectiveness of treatment · health problem or population
3 findings from 1 review

Standard polyurethane plus tissue adhesive vs standard polyurethane

Arterial catheter failure assessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement

It is very uncertain whether standard polyurethane plus tissue adhesive changes arterial catheter failure assessed during catheter dwell compared with standard polyurethane (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Standard polyurethane plus tissue adhesive vs standard polyurethane

Dislodgement assessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement

It is very uncertain whether standard polyurethane plus tissue adhesive changes dislodgement assessed during catheter dwell compared with standard polyurethane (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Standard polyurethane plus tissue adhesive vs standard polyurethane

Occlusion assessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement

It is very uncertain whether standard polyurethane plus tissue adhesive changes occlusion assessed during catheter dwell compared with standard polyurethane (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Standard polyurethane plus tissue adhesive vs standard polyurethane

Adverse events assessed during catheter dwell and on product removal · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement

It is very uncertain whether standard polyurethane plus tissue adhesive changes adverse events assessed during catheter dwell and on product removal compared with standard polyurethane (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Tongue depressor stretches (physiotherapy) vs Intralesional steroid plus hyaluronidase injections

Maximal mouth opening (interincisal distance) · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF)

It is very uncertain whether tongue depressor stretches (physiotherapy) changes maximal mouth opening (interincisal distance) compared with intralesional steroid plus hyaluronidase injections (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anaesthesia depth monitors (BIS and M‐entropy) vs standard monitoring

Awareness Postoperative interview · patients with prevention of recall of events during surgery

Anaesthesia depth monitors (BIS and M‐entropy) showed no clear difference in awareness Postoperative interview compared with standard clinical and electronic monitoring (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anaesthesia depth monitors (BIS and M‐entropy) vs standard monitoring

Adverse effects of intraoperative wakefulness and/or postoperative awareness (i.e. post‐traumatic stress syndrome, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, etc.) · patients with prevention of recall of events during surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Service system approaches vs inactive control (usual care care, attention control, waitlist)

Trauma‐related symptoms ‐ post‐intervention ‐ not reported · for parents who are experiencing CPTSD symptoms or have experienced maltreatment in their childhood

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Service system approaches vs inactive control (usual care care, attention control, waitlist)

Psychological well‐being (secondary outcome) Not addressed · for parents who are experiencing CPTSD symptoms or have experienced maltreatment in their childhood
1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Service system approaches vs inactive control (usual care care, attention control, waitlist)

Substance use ‐ post‐intervention ‐ not reported · for parents who are experiencing CPTSD symptoms or have experienced maltreatment in their childhood

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review