Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,518 questions in 135 reviews · Infectious Diseases

current versions
No studies 135 · 8.9%Ungraded 150 · 9.9%Very low 350 · 23.1%Low 420 · 27.7%Moderate 321 · 21.1%High 142 · 9.4%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Mefloquine vs atovaquone‐proguanil
Anxiety · non‐immune adults and children travelling to or living in malaria‐endemic settings
Mefloquine for preventing malaria during travel to endemic areas (2017) · Cochrane
RR 6.12 [1.82, 20.66]1 study · 976 participantsUngraded
Mefloquine vs atovaquone‐proguanil
Depressed mood · non‐immune adults and children travelling to or living in malaria‐endemic settings
Mefloquine for preventing malaria during travel to endemic areas (2017) · Cochrane
RR 5.78 [1.71, 19.61]1 study · 976 participantsUngraded
Mefloquine vs atovaquone‐proguanil
Abnormal thoughts or perceptions · non‐immune adults and children travelling to or living in malaria‐endemic settings
Mefloquine for preventing malaria during travel to endemic areas (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.5 [0.3, 7.42]3 studies · 2433 participantsUngraded
Mefloquine vs atovaquone‐proguanil
Nausea · non‐immune adults and children travelling to or living in malaria‐endemic settings
Mefloquine for preventing malaria during travel to endemic areas (2017) · Cochrane
RR 2.72 [1.52, 4.86]1 study · 976 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Clinical malaria (incidence) · people living in malaria‐endemic areas
Larvivorous fish for preventing malaria transmission (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Entomological inoculation rate · people living in malaria‐endemic areas
Larvivorous fish for preventing malaria transmission (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Density of adult malaria vectors · people living in malaria‐endemic areas
Larvivorous fish for preventing malaria transmission (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Density of immature vector stages in water bodies Quasi‐experimental studies · people living in malaria‐endemic areas
Larvivorous fish for preventing malaria transmission (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRVery low
Intervention NR
Larval sites positive for immature vector stages Quasi‐experimental studies · people living in malaria‐endemic areas
Larvivorous fish for preventing malaria transmission (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRLow
Intervention NR
All‐cause mortality · HIV‐positive adults
Interleukin‐2 as an adjunct to antiretroviral therapy for HIV‐positive adults (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.97 [0.8, 1.17]6 studies · 6565 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
CD4 cell count · HIV‐positive adults
Interleukin‐2 as an adjunct to antiretroviral therapy for HIV‐positive adults (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted21 studies · 7600 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
HIV RNA levels less than 50 cells/mL · HIV‐positive adults
Interleukin‐2 as an adjunct to antiretroviral therapy for HIV‐positive adults (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.97 [0.81, 1.15]5 studies · 805 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
HIV RNA levels less than 500 cells/mL · HIV‐positive adults
Interleukin‐2 as an adjunct to antiretroviral therapy for HIV‐positive adults (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.96 [0.82, 1.12]4 studies · 5929 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Opportunistic infections · HIV‐positive adults
Interleukin‐2 as an adjunct to antiretroviral therapy for HIV‐positive adults (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.79 [0.55, 1.13]7 studies · 6141 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Adverse events (grade 3 or 4) · HIV‐positive adults
Interleukin‐2 as an adjunct to antiretroviral therapy for HIV‐positive adults (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.47 [1.1, 1.96]6 studies · 6291 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Depression score · adults living with HIV
Psychosocial group interventions to improve psychological well‐being in adults living with HIV (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted10 studies · 1139 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Anxiety score · adults living with HIV
Psychosocial group interventions to improve psychological well‐being in adults living with HIV (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 471 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Stress score · adults living with HIV
Psychosocial group interventions to improve psychological well‐being in adults living with HIV (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 507 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Coping score · adults living with HIV
Psychosocial group interventions to improve psychological well‐being in adults living with HIV (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 697 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Depression score · adults living with HIV
Psychosocial group interventions to improve psychological well‐being in adults living with HIV (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 233 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Anxiety score · adults living with HIV
Psychosocial group interventions to improve psychological well‐being in adults living with HIV (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 162 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Stress score · adults living with HIV
Psychosocial group interventions to improve psychological well‐being in adults living with HIV (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 137 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Coping score · adults living with HIV
Psychosocial group interventions to improve psychological well‐being in adults living with HIV (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Tuberculosis outreach screening vs no intervention
Tuberculosis cases detected (microbiologically confirmed) · all age groups
Interventions to increase tuberculosis case detection at primary healthcare or community‐level services (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.24 [0.86, 1.79]4 studies · 163043 participantsLow
Health promotion activities vs no intervention
Long‐term tuberculosis prevalence · all age groups
Interventions to increase tuberculosis case detection at primary healthcare or community‐level services (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Training interventions vs no intervention
Tuberculosis cases detected (microbiologically confirmed) · all age groups
Interventions to increase tuberculosis case detection at primary healthcare or community‐level services (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.68 [1.03, 2.72]1 study · 1999 participantsLow
Training interventions vs no intervention
Treatment success · all age groups
Interventions to increase tuberculosis case detection at primary healthcare or community‐level services (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Training interventions vs no intervention
Tuberculosis mortality · all age groups
Interventions to increase tuberculosis case detection at primary healthcare or community‐level services (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Training interventions vs no intervention
Long‐term tuberculosis prevalence · all age groups
Interventions to increase tuberculosis case detection at primary healthcare or community‐level services (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Outreach tuberculosis screening vs health promotion
Tuberculosis cases detected (microbiologically confirmed) · adults
Interventions to increase tuberculosis case detection at primary healthcare or community‐level services (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.71 [1.27, 2.31]1 study · 110162 participantsVery low
Outreach tuberculosis screening vs health promotion
Treatment success · adults
Interventions to increase tuberculosis case detection at primary healthcare or community‐level services (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Outreach tuberculosis screening vs health promotion
Tuberculosis mortality · adults
Interventions to increase tuberculosis case detection at primary healthcare or community‐level services (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Outreach tuberculosis screening vs health promotion
Long‐term tuberculosis prevalence · adults
Interventions to increase tuberculosis case detection at primary healthcare or community‐level services (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Outreach clinic vs house‐to‐house screening
Tuberculosis cases detected (microbiologically confirmed) · adults
Interventions to increase tuberculosis case detection at primary healthcare or community‐level services (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.48 [1.11, 1.97]1 study · 405819 participantsVery low
Tuberculosis outreach screening vs no intervention
Default within first 2 months · all age groups
Interventions to increase tuberculosis case detection at primary healthcare or community‐level services (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.67 [0.47, 0.96]849 participantsLow
Outreach clinic vs house‐to‐house screening
Treatment success · adults
Interventions to increase tuberculosis case detection at primary healthcare or community‐level services (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Outreach clinic vs house‐to‐house screening
Tuberculosis mortality · adults
Interventions to increase tuberculosis case detection at primary healthcare or community‐level services (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Outreach clinic vs house‐to‐house screening
Long‐term tuberculosis prevalence · adults
Interventions to increase tuberculosis case detection at primary healthcare or community‐level services (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Tuberculosis outreach screening vs no intervention
Treatment success · all age groups
Interventions to increase tuberculosis case detection at primary healthcare or community‐level services (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.07 [1, 1.15]849 participantsLow
Tuberculosis outreach screening vs no intervention
Treatment failure · all age groups
Interventions to increase tuberculosis case detection at primary healthcare or community‐level services (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.57 [0.5, 4.92]849 participantsVery low
Tuberculosis outreach screening vs no intervention
Tuberculosis mortality · all age groups
Interventions to increase tuberculosis case detection at primary healthcare or community‐level services (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.99 [0.43, 2.25]849 participantsLow
Tuberculosis outreach screening vs no intervention
Long‐term tuberculosis prevalence · all age groups
Interventions to increase tuberculosis case detection at primary healthcare or community‐level services (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.14 [0.65, 2]556836 participantsVery low
Health promotion activities vs no intervention
Long‐term tuberculosis prevalence (assessed at 4 years) · all age groups
Interventions to increase tuberculosis case detection at primary healthcare or community‐level services (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.31405788 participantsVery low
Health promotion activities vs no intervention
Treatment success · all age groups
Interventions to increase tuberculosis case detection at primary healthcare or community‐level services (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Health promotion activities vs no intervention
Tuberculosis mortality · all age groups
Interventions to increase tuberculosis case detection at primary healthcare or community‐level services (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Any corticosteroid vs control
Death · adults or children with tuberculous meningitis on tuberculosis (TB) chemotherapy
Corticosteroids for managing tuberculous meningitis (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.75 [0.65, 0.87]9 studies · 1337 participantsHigh
Any corticosteroid vs control
Disabling neurological deficit · adults or children with tuberculous meningitis on tuberculosis (TB) chemotherapy
Corticosteroids for managing tuberculous meningitis (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.92 [0.71, 1.2]8 studies · 1314 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Virological success · antiretroviral‐naïve individuals
Efavirenz or nevirapine in three‐drug combination therapy with two nucleoside or nucleotide‐reverse… (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.04 [0.99, 1.09]10 studies · 2438 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Severe adverse events: pyrexia · antiretroviral‐naïve individuals
Efavirenz or nevirapine in three‐drug combination therapy with two nucleoside or nucleotide‐reverse… (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.65 [0.15, 2.73]3 studies · 1799 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Severe adverse events: raised transaminases · antiretroviral‐naïve individuals
Efavirenz or nevirapine in three‐drug combination therapy with two nucleoside or nucleotide‐reverse… (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.52 [0.35, 0.78]3 studies · 1299 participantsHigh