What do systematic reviews say?

Respiratory muscle training vs sham training or no training

• Respiratory muscle training for multiple sclerosis 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 56 participants
  Low

Summary of findings 1: blue‐light filtering lenses vs non blue‐light filtering IOL

Summary of findings 1: blue‐light filtering lenses may leads to lower proportion of participants with adverse events with a probable… compared with non‐blue‐light filtering lenses (low certainty).

• Blue‐light filtering spectacle lenses for visual performance, sleep, and macular health in adults 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  9 studies · 333 participants
  Low

Summary of findings: Hydrogel spacer vs no intervention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings: Hydrogel spacer vs no intervention

Summary of findings: Hydrogel spacer showed no clear difference in acute and late GI toxicity (grade 2+) compared with no intervention (low certainty).

• Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.51 [0.08, 3.38]
  2 studies · 289 participants
  Low

Summary of findings: Hydrogel spacer vs no intervention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings: Hydrogel spacer vs no intervention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings: serious adverse events (HEC) when vs treatment with aprepitant + granisetron

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Antiemetics for adults for prevention of nausea and vomiting caused by moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings: serious adverse events (MEC) when vs treatment with granisetron

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Antiemetics for adults for prevention of nausea and vomiting caused by moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings table (sensitivity analysis): interventions esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma vs gastric carcinoma

Summary of findings table (sensitivity analysis): interventions… showed no clear difference in studies with gastric cancer participants in addition to eligible… compared with gastric carcinoma; GRADE not reported.

• Palliative chemotherapy and targeted therapies for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  HR 0.94 [0.83, 1.05]
  8 studies · 1755 participants
  GRADE not reported

Summary of findings table (sensitivity analysis): interventions esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma vs gastric carcinoma

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table (sensitivity analysis): interventions… changes sensitivity analysis, meta‐regression analysis, first part compared with gastric carcinoma (very low certainty).

• Palliative chemotherapy and targeted therapies for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  HR 0.75 [0.68, 0.84]
  11 studies · 1347 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings table (sensitivity analysis): interventions esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma vs gastric carcinoma

Summary of findings table (sensitivity analysis): interventions… led to lower sensitivity analysis, only esophageal and GE‐junction cancer… compared with gastric carcinoma; GRADE not reported.

• Palliative chemotherapy and targeted therapies for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  HR 0.66 [0.54, 0.81]
  5 studies · 538 participants
  GRADE not reported

Summary of findings table (sensitivity analysis): interventions esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma vs gastric carcinoma

Summary of findings table (sensitivity analysis): interventions… showed no clear difference in sensitivity analysis, only gastric cancer participants compared with gastric carcinoma; GRADE not reported.

• Palliative chemotherapy and targeted therapies for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  HR 0.89 [0.76, 1.04]
  5 studies · 2093 participants
  GRADE not reported

Summary of findings table (sensitivity analysis): interventions esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma vs gastric carcinoma

Summary of findings table (sensitivity analysis): interventions… probably leads to lower sensitivity analysis, meta‐regression analysis, second part compared with gastric carcinoma (moderate certainty).

• Palliative chemotherapy and targeted therapies for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  HR 0.66 [0.54, 0.81]
  5 studies · 538 participants
  Moderate

Summary of findings: Endorectal balloon vs no intervention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings: Endorectal balloon vs no intervention

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Endorectal balloon changes acute and late GI toxicity (grade 2+) compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

• Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1 [0.41, 2.42]
  1 study · 48 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings: Endorectal balloon vs no intervention

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Endorectal balloon changes diarrhoea (grade 2+) compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

• Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.71 [0.37, 1.35]
  1 study · 43 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings: Endorectal balloon vs no intervention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings table ‐ Preoperative exercise training vs no exercise

• Preoperative exercise training for people with non‐small cell lung cancer 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 188 participants
  Moderate

Summary of findings table ‐ Preoperative exercise training vs no exercise

• Preoperative exercise training for people with non‐small cell lung cancer 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 191 participants
  Moderate
• Preoperative exercise training for people with non‐small cell lung cancer 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  6 studies · 474 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings table ‐ Preoperative exercise training vs no exercise

• Preoperative exercise training for people with non‐small cell lung cancer 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  4 studies · 197 participants
  Low