What do systematic reviews say?

Summary of findings: intervention vs no treatment

• Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  27 studies · 3423 participants
  Moderate
• Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  9 studies · 540 participants
  Moderate

Summary of findings: intervention vs usual care or attention control

• Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  6 studies · 260 participants
  Moderate
• Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings: intervention vs usual care or attention control

• Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  13 studies · 967 participants
  Moderate

Summary of findings: intervention vs usual care or attention control

• Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 160 participants
  Low

Summary of findings: intervention vs usual care or attention control

• Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  5 studies · 246 participants
  Moderate
• Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings: intervention vs usual care or attention control

• Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  14 studies · 1126 participants
  High

Summary of findings: intervention vs usual care or attention control

• Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  5 studies · 214 participants
  Moderate

Summary of findings: intervention vs usual care or attention control

• Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 105 participants
  Low

Summary of findings: intervention vs no treatment

• Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  25 studies · 4558 participants
  Moderate

Summary of findings: intervention vs no treatment

• Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  8 studies · 1829 participants
  Moderate

Summary of findings: intervention vs no treatment

• Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 34 participants
  Very low
• Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 34 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings: intervention vs no treatment

• Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 292 participants
  Low

Summary of findings: intervention vs no treatment

• Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 271 participants
  Low

Summary of findings: intervention vs no treatment

• Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 318 participants
  Low

Summary of findings: Restitutive interventions vs control

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Restitutive interventions changes visual field (TAP border position in degrees of visual angle from… compared with control (very low certainty).

• Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  MD 1.02
  1 study · 19 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings: Compensative interventions vs control

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Compensative interventions changes extended activities of daily living (Mobility questionnaire and… compared with control (very low certainty).

• Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  SMD 0.49
  2 studies · 97 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings: Compensative interventions vs control

Summary of findings: Compensative interventions showed no clear difference in reading ability (Reading speed; various tests) After intervention compared with control (low certainty).

• Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  SMD 0.26
  4 studies · 162 participants
  Low

Summary of findings: Compensative interventions vs control

Summary of findings: Compensative interventions may leads to higher quality of life (National Eye Institute Visual Function… compared with control (low certainty).

• Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  MD 9.36 [3.1, 15.62]
  2 studies · 96 participants
  Low

Summary of findings: Compensative interventions vs control

Summary of findings: Compensative interventions showed no clear difference in scanning ‐ cancellation (cancellation tests ‐ time to complete)… compared with control (low certainty).

• Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 97 participants
  Low

Summary of findings: Compensative interventions vs control

Summary of findings: Compensative interventions may leads to higher adverse events (number of participants with reported events during… compared with control (low certainty).

• Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 5.18
  2 studies · 108 participants
  Low