Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,521 questions in 132 reviews · Hepato-Biliary

current versions
No studies 303 · 19.9%Ungraded 39 · 2.6%Very low 876 · 57.6%Low 216 · 14.2%Moderate 65 · 4.3%High 22 · 1.4%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Recombinant human adenovirus‐p53 and hydroxycamptothecin (rAd‐p53/HCT) vs hydroxycamptothecin
Proportion of people with ≥ 1 serious adverse events · participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Gene therapy for people with hepatocellular carcinoma (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Recombinant human adenovirus‐p53 and hydroxycamptothecin (rAd‐p53/HCT) vs hydroxycamptothecin
Health‐related quality of life · participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Gene therapy for people with hepatocellular carcinoma (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Recombinant human adenovirus‐p53 and hydroxycamptothecin (rAd‐p53/HCT) vs hydroxycamptothecin
Proportion of people with disease progression · participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Gene therapy for people with hepatocellular carcinoma (2024) · Cochrane
RR 2.4 [0.57, 10.08]1 study · 48 participantsVery low
Pexastimogene devacirepvec (Pexa‐Vec) plus best supportive care vs best supportive care alone
Proportion of people with ≥ 1 serious adverse events (at 20 months) · participants with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
Gene therapy for people with hepatocellular carcinoma (2024) · Cochrane
RR 1.42 [0.6, 3.33]1 study · 129 participantsVery low
Recombinant human adenovirus‐p53 and hydroxycamptothecin (rAd‐p53/HCT) vs hydroxycamptothecin
Adverse events considered non‐serious (number of events) · participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Gene therapy for people with hepatocellular carcinoma (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 48 participantsVery low
Recombinant human adenovirus‐p53 and 5‐fluorouracil (rAd‐p53/5‐Fu) plus transarterial chemoembolisation vs transarterial chemoembolisation
Overall survival · participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Gene therapy for people with hepatocellular carcinoma (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Recombinant human adenovirus‐p53 and 5‐fluorouracil (rAd‐p53/5‐Fu) plus transarterial chemoembolisation vs transarterial chemoembolisation
Proportion of people with ≥ 1 serious adverse events · participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Gene therapy for people with hepatocellular carcinoma (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Recombinant human adenovirus‐p53 and 5‐fluorouracil (rAd‐p53/5‐Fu) plus transarterial chemoembolisation vs transarterial chemoembolisation
Health‐related quality of life · participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Gene therapy for people with hepatocellular carcinoma (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Recombinant human adenovirus‐p53 and 5‐fluorouracil (rAd‐p53/5‐Fu) plus transarterial chemoembolisation vs transarterial chemoembolisation
Proportion of people with disease progression · participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Gene therapy for people with hepatocellular carcinoma (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.86 [0.34, 2.16]1 study · 46 participantsVery low
Recombinant human adenovirus‐p53 and 5‐fluorouracil (rAd‐p53/5‐Fu) plus transarterial chemoembolisation vs transarterial chemoembolisation
Adverse events considered non‐serious (number of events) · participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Gene therapy for people with hepatocellular carcinoma (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
E1B‐deleted (dl1520) adenovirus vs percutaneous ethanol injection
Overall survival · participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Gene therapy for people with hepatocellular carcinoma (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
E1B‐deleted (dl1520) adenovirus vs percutaneous ethanol injection
Proportion of people with ≥ 1 serious adverse events · participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Gene therapy for people with hepatocellular carcinoma (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
E1B‐deleted (dl1520) adenovirus vs percutaneous ethanol injection
Health‐related quality of life · participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Gene therapy for people with hepatocellular carcinoma (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
E1B‐deleted (dl1520) adenovirus vs percutaneous ethanol injection
Proportion of people with disease progression · participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Gene therapy for people with hepatocellular carcinoma (2024) · Cochrane
RR 1.33 [0.58, 3.09]1 study · 10 participantsVery low
Pexastimogene devacirepvec (Pexa‐Vec) plus best supportive care vs best supportive care alone
Health‐related quality of life · participants with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
Gene therapy for people with hepatocellular carcinoma (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 129 participantsVery low
E1B‐deleted (dl1520) adenovirus vs percutaneous ethanol injection
Adverse events considered non‐serious (number of participants) · participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Gene therapy for people with hepatocellular carcinoma (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.82 [0.49, 1.38]1 study · 10 participantsVery low
Pexastimogene devacirepvec (Pexa‐Vec) plus best supportive care vs best supportive care alone
Proportion of people with disease progression · participants with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
Gene therapy for people with hepatocellular carcinoma (2024) · Cochrane
RR 2.64 [1.29, 5.43]1 study · 129 participantsVery low
Pexastimogene devacirepvec (Pexa‐Vec) plus best supportive care vs best supportive care alone
Adverse events considered non‐serious (number of participants) · participants with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
Gene therapy for people with hepatocellular carcinoma (2024) · Cochrane
RR 2 [1.47, 2.72]1 study · 129 participantsVery low
Adenovirus‐thymidine kinase with ganciclovir (ADV‐TK/GCV) plus liver transplantation vs liver transplantation
All‐cause mortality · participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Gene therapy for people with hepatocellular carcinoma (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.39 [0.2, 0.76]1 study · 45 participantsVery low
Adenovirus‐thymidine kinase with ganciclovir (ADV‐TK/GCV) plus liver transplantation vs liver transplantation
Proportion of people with ≥ 1 serious adverse events during treatment · participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Gene therapy for people with hepatocellular carcinoma (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adenovirus‐thymidine kinase with ganciclovir (ADV‐TK/GCV) plus liver transplantation vs liver transplantation
Health‐related quality of life · participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Gene therapy for people with hepatocellular carcinoma (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adenovirus‐thymidine kinase with ganciclovir (ADV‐TK/GCV) plus liver transplantation vs liver transplantation
Proportion of people with disease progression · participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Gene therapy for people with hepatocellular carcinoma (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table ‐ Endoscopic sphincterotomy vs sham treatment
Proportion of participants without successful treatment at longest · adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction
Endoscopic sphincterotomy for adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (2024) · Cochrane
RR 1.05 [0.66, 1.66]3 studies · 340 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ Endoscopic sphincterotomy vs endoscopic papillary balloon dilation
All‐cause mortality (or overall survival) ‐ not reported · adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction
Endoscopic sphincterotomy for adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table ‐ Endoscopic sphincterotomy vs endoscopic papillary balloon dilation
Proportion of participants with ≥ 1 non‐serious adverse events ‐ not reported · adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction
Endoscopic sphincterotomy for adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table ‐ Biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy vs dual endoscopic sphincterotomy
Proportion of participants without successful treatment at 1 year · adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction
Endoscopic sphincterotomy for adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.65 [0.32, 1.31]1 study · 99 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ Biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy vs dual endoscopic sphincterotomy
Proportion of participants with ≥ 1 serious adverse events ‐ not reported · adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction
Endoscopic sphincterotomy for adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table ‐ Biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy vs dual endoscopic sphincterotomy
Health‐related quality of life ‐ not reported · adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction
Endoscopic sphincterotomy for adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table ‐ Biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy vs dual endoscopic sphincterotomy
All‐cause mortality (or overall survival) ‐ not reported · adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction
Endoscopic sphincterotomy for adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table ‐ Biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy vs dual endoscopic sphincterotomy
Proportion of participants with ≥ 1 non‐serious adverse events ‐ not reported · adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction
Endoscopic sphincterotomy for adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table ‐ Endoscopic sphincterotomy vs sham treatment
Proportion of participants with ≥ 1 serious adverse events at 1 year · adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction
Endoscopic sphincterotomy for adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.71 [0.34, 1.46]1 study · 214 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ Endoscopic sphincterotomy vs sham treatment
Quality of life · adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction
Endoscopic sphincterotomy for adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 214 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ Endoscopic sphincterotomy vs sham treatment
Quality of life · adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction
Endoscopic sphincterotomy for adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 214 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ Endoscopic sphincterotomy vs sham treatment
All‐cause mortality (or overall survival) ‐ not reported · adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction
Endoscopic sphincterotomy for adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table ‐ Endoscopic sphincterotomy vs sham treatment
Proportion of participants with ≥ 1 non‐serious adverse events ‐ not reported · adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction
Endoscopic sphincterotomy for adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table ‐ Endoscopic sphincterotomy vs endoscopic papillary balloon dilation
Proportion of participants without successful treatment ‐ not reported · adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction
Endoscopic sphincterotomy for adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table ‐ Endoscopic sphincterotomy vs endoscopic papillary balloon dilation
Proportion of participants with ≥ 1 serious adverse events at 1 year · adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction
Endoscopic sphincterotomy for adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.34 [0.04, 3.15]1 study · 91 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ Endoscopic sphincterotomy vs endoscopic papillary balloon dilation
Health‐related quality of life ‐ not reported · adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction
Endoscopic sphincterotomy for adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table ‐ Antibiotics vs placebo or no intervention
All‐cause mortality · farmworkers, soldiers, and people in endemic areas
Antibiotic prophylaxis for leptospirosis (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.15 [0.01, 2.83]1 study · 782 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ Antibiotics vs other antibiotics
Clinical diagnosis of leptospirosis regardless of laboratory confirmation · farmworkers
Antibiotic prophylaxis for leptospirosis (2024) · Cochrane
RR 4.18 [0.94, 18.66]1 study · 137 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ Antibiotics vs other antibiotics
Clinical diagnosis of leptospirosis confirmed by laboratory diagnosis · farmworkers
Antibiotic prophylaxis for leptospirosis (2024) · Cochrane
RR 4.18 [0.94, 18.66]1 study · 137 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ Antibiotics vs other antibiotics
Serious adverse events ‐ not reported · farmworkers
Antibiotic prophylaxis for leptospirosis (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table ‐ Antibiotics vs other antibiotics
Quality of life ‐ not reported · farmworkers
Antibiotic prophylaxis for leptospirosis (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table ‐ Antibiotics vs other antibiotics
Non‐serious adverse events · farmworkers
Antibiotic prophylaxis for leptospirosis (2024) · Cochrane
RR 1.12 [0.36, 3.48]1 study · 137 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ Antibiotics vs placebo or no intervention
Laboratory‐confirmed leptospirosis · farmworkers, soldiers, and people in endemic areas
Antibiotic prophylaxis for leptospirosis (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.56 [0.25, 1.26]5 studies · 2593 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ Antibiotics vs placebo or no intervention
Clinical diagnosis of infection regardless of laboratory confirmed · farmworkers, soldiers, and people in endemic areas
Antibiotic prophylaxis for leptospirosis (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.76 [0.53, 1.08]4 studies · 1653 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ Antibiotics vs placebo or no intervention
Clinical diagnosis confirmed by laboratory diagnosis · farmworkers, soldiers, and people in endemic areas
Antibiotic prophylaxis for leptospirosis (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.57 [0.26, 1.26]4 studies · 1653 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ Antibiotics vs placebo or no intervention
Serious adverse events ‐ not reported · farmworkers, soldiers, and people in endemic areas
Antibiotic prophylaxis for leptospirosis (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table ‐ Antibiotics vs placebo or no intervention
Quality of life ‐ not reported · farmworkers, soldiers, and people in endemic areas
Antibiotic prophylaxis for leptospirosis (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table ‐ Antibiotics vs placebo or no intervention
Non‐serious adverse events · farmworkers, soldiers, and people in endemic areas
Antibiotic prophylaxis for leptospirosis (2024) · Cochrane
RR 10.13 [2.4, 42.71]3 studies · 1909 participantsVery low