Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,521 questions in 132 reviews · Hepato-Biliary

current versions
No studies 303 · 19.9%Ungraded 39 · 2.6%Very low 876 · 57.6%Low 216 · 14.2%Moderate 65 · 4.3%High 22 · 1.4%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Microwave coagulation in addition to conventional transarterial chemoembolisation vs conventional transarterial chemoembolisation alone
All‐cause mortality · people with liver metastases
Microwave coagulation for liver metastases (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Microwave coagulation vs conventional surgery
Health‐related quality of life · people with liver metastases
Microwave coagulation for liver metastases (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Microwave coagulation vs conventional surgery
Any adverse events or complications · people with liver metastases
Microwave coagulation for liver metastases (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 30 participantsVery low
Microwave coagulation vs conventional surgery
Disease‐free survival · people with liver metastases
Microwave coagulation for liver metastases (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 30 participantsVery low
Microwave coagulation vs conventional surgery
Failure to clear liver metastases · people with liver metastases
Microwave coagulation for liver metastases (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Microwave coagulation vs conventional surgery
Recurrence of liver metastases · people with liver metastases
Microwave coagulation for liver metastases (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Microwave coagulation vs radiofrequency ablation
All‐cause mortality · people with liver metastases
Microwave coagulation for liver metastases (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.62 [0.26, 1.47]1 study · 50 participantsVery low
Microwave coagulation vs radiofrequency ablation
Time to mortality (overall survival) · people with liver metastases
Microwave coagulation for liver metastases (2024) · Cochrane
HR 0.63 [0.23, 1.73]1 study · 50 participantsVery low
Microwave coagulation vs radiofrequency ablation
Health‐related quality of life · people with liver metastases
Microwave coagulation for liver metastases (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Microwave coagulation vs radiofrequency ablation
Any adverse events or complications · people with liver metastases
Microwave coagulation for liver metastases (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.19 [0.01, 3.67]1 study · 50 participantsVery low
Microwave coagulation vs radiofrequency ablation
Disease‐free survival · people with liver metastases
Microwave coagulation for liver metastases (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Microwave coagulation in addition to conventional transarterial chemoembolisation vs conventional transarterial chemoembolisation alone
Time to mortality · people with liver metastases
Microwave coagulation for liver metastases (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Microwave coagulation vs radiofrequency ablation
Failure to clear liver metastases · people with liver metastases
Microwave coagulation for liver metastases (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 50 participantsUngraded
Microwave coagulation vs radiofrequency ablation
Recurrence of liver metastases local progression · people with liver metastases
Microwave coagulation for liver metastases (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.19 [0.01, 3.67]1 study · 50 participantsVery low
Microwave coagulation vs radiofrequency ablation
Recurrence of liver metastases distant recurrence · people with liver metastases
Microwave coagulation for liver metastases (2024) · Cochrane
RR 1.03 [0.5, 2.08]1 study · 50 participantsVery low
Microwave coagulation in addition to conventional transarterial chemoembolisation vs conventional transarterial chemoembolisation alone
Health‐related quality of life · people with liver metastases
Microwave coagulation for liver metastases (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Microwave coagulation in addition to conventional transarterial chemoembolisation vs conventional transarterial chemoembolisation alone
Any adverse events or complications · people with liver metastases
Microwave coagulation for liver metastases (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 50 participantsVery low
Microwave coagulation in addition to conventional transarterial chemoembolisation vs conventional transarterial chemoembolisation alone
Disease‐free survival · people with liver metastases
Microwave coagulation for liver metastases (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Microwave coagulation in addition to conventional transarterial chemoembolisation vs conventional transarterial chemoembolisation alone
Failure to clear liver metastases · people with liver metastases
Microwave coagulation for liver metastases (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Microwave coagulation in addition to conventional transarterial chemoembolisation vs conventional transarterial chemoembolisation alone
Recurrence of liver metastases · people with liver metastases
Microwave coagulation for liver metastases (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Microwave coagulation vs conventional surgery
All‐cause mortality · people with liver metastases
Microwave coagulation for liver metastases (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 40 participantsUngraded
Microwave coagulation vs conventional surgery
Time to mortality (overall survival) · people with liver metastases
Microwave coagulation for liver metastases (2024) · Cochrane
HR 0.91 [0.39, 2.15]1 study · 30 participantsVery low
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts vs conventional treatment
All‐cause mortality · adults with hepatorenal syndrome
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts for adults with hepatorenal syndrome (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.88 [0.55, 1.38]2 studies · 130 participantsVery low
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts vs conventional treatment
Morbidity due to any cause · adults with hepatorenal syndrome
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts for adults with hepatorenal syndrome (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.95 [0.77, 1.18]2 studies · 130 participantsLow
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts vs conventional treatment
Serious adverse events · adults with hepatorenal syndrome
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts for adults with hepatorenal syndrome (2024) · Cochrane
RR 1.6 [0.1, 24.59]2 studies · 130 participantsVery low
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts vs conventional treatment
Health‐related quality of life · adults with hepatorenal syndrome
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts for adults with hepatorenal syndrome (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts vs conventional treatment
Participants who did not receive a liver transplant · adults with hepatorenal syndrome
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts for adults with hepatorenal syndrome (2024) · Cochrane
RR 1.03 [0.93, 1.14]2 studies · 130 participantsVery low
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts vs conventional treatment
Participants without improvement in kidney function · adults with hepatorenal syndrome
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts for adults with hepatorenal syndrome (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.53 [0.27, 1.02]1 study · 70 participantsLow
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts vs conventional treatment
Length of hospitalisation measured in days · adults with hepatorenal syndrome
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts for adults with hepatorenal syndrome (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 60 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
All‐cause mortality · participants with gallstone disease (cholesterol, pigment, or mixed)
Modified dietary fat intake for treatment of gallstone disease in people of any age (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Serious adverse events at longest · participants with gallstone disease (cholesterol, pigment, or mixed)
Modified dietary fat intake for treatment of gallstone disease in people of any age (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Health‐related quality of life · participants with gallstone disease (cholesterol, pigment, or mixed)
Modified dietary fat intake for treatment of gallstone disease in people of any age (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table ‐ Deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) vs moderate NMB
All‐cause mortality short‐term · adults undergoing intra‐ and transperitoneal laparoscopic procedures
Deep neuromuscular blockade in adults undergoing an abdominal laparoscopic procedure (2024) · Cochrane
Peto OR 7.22 [0.45, 115.43]12 studies · 1390 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ Deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) vs no NMB
Serious adverse events (SAEs) start of surgery until 8 hours after surgery · adults undergoing intra‐ and transperitoneal laparoscopic procedures
Deep neuromuscular blockade in adults undergoing an abdominal laparoscopic procedure (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 25 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ Deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) vs moderate NMB
Health‐related quality of life · adults undergoing intra‐ and transperitoneal laparoscopic procedures
Deep neuromuscular blockade in adults undergoing an abdominal laparoscopic procedure (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 440 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) vs moderate NMB
Serious adverse events (SAEs) start of surgery until 8 hours after surgery · adults undergoing intra‐ and transperitoneal laparoscopic procedures
Deep neuromuscular blockade in adults undergoing an abdominal laparoscopic procedure (2024) · Cochrane
Peto OR 0.95 [0.59, 1.52]21 studies · 2231 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ Deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) vs moderate NMB
Short‐term serious adverse events (SAEs) · adults undergoing intra‐ and transperitoneal laparoscopic procedures
Deep neuromuscular blockade in adults undergoing an abdominal laparoscopic procedure (2024) · Cochrane
Peto OR 0.9 [0.56, 1.42]16 studies · 1764 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ Deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) vs shallow NMB
All‐cause mortality ‐ not reported · adults undergoing intra‐ and transperitoneal laparoscopic procedures
Deep neuromuscular blockade in adults undergoing an abdominal laparoscopic procedure (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table ‐ Deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) vs shallow NMB
Health‐related quality of life ‐ not reported · adults undergoing intra‐ and transperitoneal laparoscopic procedures
Deep neuromuscular blockade in adults undergoing an abdominal laparoscopic procedure (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table ‐ Deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) vs shallow NMB
Short‐term serious adverse events (SAEs) · adults undergoing intra‐ and transperitoneal laparoscopic procedures
Deep neuromuscular blockade in adults undergoing an abdominal laparoscopic procedure (2024) · Cochrane
RR 1.66 [0.5, 5.57]2 studies · 158 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ Deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) vs no NMB
All‐cause mortality start of surgery ‐ not reported · adults undergoing intra‐ and transperitoneal laparoscopic procedures
Deep neuromuscular blockade in adults undergoing an abdominal laparoscopic procedure (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table ‐ Deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) vs no NMB
Health‐related quality of life ‐ not reported · adults undergoing intra‐ and transperitoneal laparoscopic procedures
Deep neuromuscular blockade in adults undergoing an abdominal laparoscopic procedure (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Pexastimogene devacirepvec (Pexa‐Vec) plus best supportive care vs best supportive care alone
Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 20 months) (censored observation) · participants with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
Gene therapy for people with hepatocellular carcinoma (2024) · Cochrane
HR 1.19 [0.78, 1.82]1 study · 129 participantsVery low
Adenovirus‐thymidine kinase with ganciclovir (ADV‐TK/GCV) plus liver transplantation vs liver transplantation
Adverse events considered non‐serious (number of participants) · participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Gene therapy for people with hepatocellular carcinoma (2024) · Cochrane
RR 20.13 [1.25, 324]1 study · 45 participantsVery low
Double‐dose adenovirus‐thymidine kinase with ganciclovir (ADV‐TK/GCV) plus liver transplantation vs liver transplantation
All‐cause mortality · participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Gene therapy for people with hepatocellular carcinoma (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.4 [0.22, 0.73]1 study · 86 participantsLow
Double‐dose adenovirus‐thymidine kinase with ganciclovir (ADV‐TK/GCV) plus liver transplantation vs liver transplantation
Proportion of people with ≥ 1 serious adverse events during treatment · participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Gene therapy for people with hepatocellular carcinoma (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Double‐dose adenovirus‐thymidine kinase with ganciclovir (ADV‐TK/GCV) plus liver transplantation vs liver transplantation
Health‐related quality of life · participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Gene therapy for people with hepatocellular carcinoma (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Double‐dose adenovirus‐thymidine kinase with ganciclovir (ADV‐TK/GCV) plus liver transplantation vs liver transplantation
Proportion of people with disease progression · participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Gene therapy for people with hepatocellular carcinoma (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Double‐dose adenovirus‐thymidine kinase with ganciclovir (ADV‐TK/GCV) plus liver transplantation vs liver transplantation
Adverse events considered non‐serious · participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Gene therapy for people with hepatocellular carcinoma (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Recombinant human adenovirus‐p53 and hydroxycamptothecin (rAd‐p53/HCT) vs hydroxycamptothecin
Overall survival Censored · participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Gene therapy for people with hepatocellular carcinoma (2024) · Cochrane
RR 3.06 [0.16, 60.47]1 study · 48 participantsVery low