Requirement for vitrectomy · people with symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion
Ocriplasmin injection probably leads to lower requirement for vitrectomy compared with control (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.67 [0.5, 0.91]
Studies not reported
Moderate
Intervention not reported
Mean BCVA (logMAR) · people with proliferative diabetic retinopathy undergoing vitrectomy
The intervention showed no clear difference in mean BCVA (logMAR) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Early POVCH Â · people with proliferative diabetic retinopathy undergoing vitrectomy
The intervention probably leads to lower early POVCH Â (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Late POVCH Â · people with proliferative diabetic retinopathy undergoing vitrectomy
The intervention leads to lower late POVCH Â (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Revision surgery for POVCH · people with proliferative diabetic retinopathy undergoing vitrectomy
The intervention showed no clear difference in revision surgery for POVCH (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Revision surgery for recurrent traction and/or RRD · people with proliferative diabetic retinopathy undergoing vitrectomy
The intervention showed no clear difference in revision surgery for recurrent traction and/or RRD (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Intraoperative retinal breaks · people with proliferative diabetic retinopathy undergoing vitrectomy
The intervention leads to lower intraoperative retinal breaks (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Silicone oil use · people with proliferative diabetic retinopathy undergoing vitrectomy
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes silicone oil use (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of eyes with retinal displacement at 6 months or later (RR < 1 favored) · people with primary macula‐involving rhegmatogenous retinal detachments
It is very uncertain whether face‐down positioning changes proportion of eyes with retinal displacement at 6 months or later… compared with other positioning (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Visual acuity · people with primary macula‐involving rhegmatogenous retinal detachments
It is very uncertain whether face‐down positioning changes mean change in logMAR or Snellen visual acuity from baseline to 3… compared with other positioning (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Mean objective distortion score at 3 months or later (lower is favored) · people with primary macula‐involving rhegmatogenous retinal detachments
It is very uncertain whether face‐down positioning changes mean objective distortion score at 3 months or later (lower is… compared with other positioning (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Quality of life assessments at 3 months or later (higher is favored) · people with primary macula‐involving rhegmatogenous retinal detachments
It is very uncertain whether face‐down positioning changes quality of life assessments at 3 months or later (higher is favored) compared with other positioning (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Frequency of intervention‐related ocular adverse events ( · people with primary macula‐involving rhegmatogenous retinal detachments
1 finding from 1 review
Frequency of intervention‐related non‐ocular adverse events ( · people with primary macula‐involving rhegmatogenous retinal detachments
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Mean change in BCVA from baseline · people with large macular hole
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Mean postoperative BCVA (lower is better) · people with large macular hole
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low
Intervention not reported
Overall closure of macular hole at end of · people with large macular hole
The intervention probably leads to higher overall closure of macular hole at end of (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.1 [1.02, 1.18]
Studies not reported
Moderate
Intervention not reported
Speed of visual acuity improvement · people with large macular hole
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Type 1 macular hole closure at end of · people with large macular hole
The intervention probably leads to higher type 1 macular hole closure at end of (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.31 [1.03, 1.66]
Studies not reported
Moderate
Intervention not reported
Postoperative retinal detachment at end of · people with large macular hole
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Low