Visual field · stroke survivors with visual field defects
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Substitutive interventions changes visual field (change in visual field area & change in error scores,… compared with control (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Extended activities of daily living · stroke survivors with visual field defects
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Substitutive interventions changes extended activities of daily living (Change in EADL from baseline;… compared with control (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Falls · stroke survivors with visual field defects
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Substitutive interventions changes falls (number of falls) After intervention compared with control (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Quality of life (Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ‐25)) After intervention · stroke survivors with visual field defects
Summary of findings: Substitutive interventions showed no clear difference in quality of life (Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ‐25)) After… compared with control (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Scanning ‐ cancellation (line cancellation errors) After intervention · stroke survivors with visual field defects
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Substitutive interventions changes scanning ‐ cancellation (line cancellation errors) After intervention compared with control (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events during treatment period · stroke survivors with visual field defects
Summary of findings: Substitutive interventions may leads to higher adverse events (number of participants with reported events during… compared with control (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Visual field · stroke survivors with visual field defects
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Compensative interventions changes visual field (Functional field score and relative change in visual… compared with control (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Infant sleep duration per 24 h at 7, 14 and 21 days from start of intervention · infants with colic defined by recognised criteria
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Trauma‐related symptoms ‐ post‐interventionb · for parents who are experiencing CPTSD symptoms or have experienced maltreatment in their childhood
1 finding from 1 review
Psychological wellbeing ‐ post‐interventiond · for parents who are experiencing CPTSD symptoms or have experienced maltreatment in their childhood
1 finding from 1 review
Substance use ‐ post‐intervention ‐ not reported · for parents who are experiencing CPTSD symptoms or have experienced maltreatment in their childhood
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Parent relationship quality ‐ not reported · for parents who are experiencing CPTSD symptoms or have experienced maltreatment in their childhood
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Parental self‐harm ‐ post‐intervention ‐ not reported · for parents who are experiencing CPTSD symptoms or have experienced maltreatment in their childhood
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Parent‐child relationship or assessment of parenting · for parents who are experiencing CPTSD symptoms or have experienced maltreatment in their childhood
1 finding from 1 review
Parenting skills; postintervention · for parents who are experiencing CPTSD symptoms or have experienced maltreatment in their childhood
1 finding from 1 review
Receptive L2 proximal vocabulary (understanding of words taught in the intervention) · second language (L2) learners up to six years of age
1 finding from 1 review
Receptive L2 distal vocabulary (understanding of words not included in the intervention) · second language (L2) learners up to six years of age
1 finding from 1 review
Expressive L2 proximal vocabulary (expressing or producing words taught in the intervention) · second language (L2) learners up to six years of age
1 finding from 1 review
Expressive L2 distal vocabulary (expressing or producing words not taught in the intervention) · second language (L2) learners up to six years of age
1 finding from 1 review
Substance use ‐ post‐intervention ‐ not reported · for parents who are experiencing CPTSD symptoms or have experienced maltreatment in their childhood
Summary of findings table ‐ Psychological interventions showed no clear difference in substance use ‐ post‐interventiong compared with inactive control (usual care care, attention control, waitlist) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review