What do systematic reviews say?

Rehabilitation interventions vs no intervention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for perceptual disorders following stroke 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Rehabilitation interventions vs no intervention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for perceptual disorders following stroke 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Rehabilitation interventions vs no intervention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for perceptual disorders following stroke 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Rehabilitation interventions vs no intervention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for perceptual disorders following stroke 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings table ‐ Rehabilitation‐related activity interventions vs usual care with or without sham interventions

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Rehabilitation‐related activity… changes incidence of new delirium during hospitalisation compared with usual care with or without sham interventions (very low certainty).

• Exercise for acutely hospitalised older medical patients 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.86 [0.3, 2.5]
  2 studies · 732 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings table ‐ Rehabilitation‐related activity interventions vs usual care with or without sham interventions

Summary of findings table ‐ Rehabilitation‐related activity… showed no clear difference in falls during hospitalisation compared with usual care with or without sham interventions; GRADE not reported.

• Exercise for acutely hospitalised older medical patients 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.33 [0.3, 5.84]
  1 study · 250 participants
  GRADE not reported

Summary of findings table ‐ Rehabilitation‐related activity interventions vs usual care with or without sham interventions

• Exercise for acutely hospitalised older medical patients 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 350 participants
  GRADE not reported

Summary of findings table ‐ Rehabilitation‐related activity interventions vs usual care with or without sham interventions

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Rehabilitation‐related activity… changes medical deterioration during hospitalisation compared with usual care with or without sham interventions (very low certainty).

• Exercise for acutely hospitalised older medical patients 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.86 [0.3, 2.5]
  2 studies · 732 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings table ‐ Rehabilitation‐related activity interventions vs usual care with or without sham interventions

• Exercise for acutely hospitalised older medical patients 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies · 0 participants
  GRADE not reported

Summary of findings table ‐ Rehabilitation‐related activity interventions vs usual care with or without sham interventions

• Exercise for acutely hospitalised older medical patients 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  4 studies · 2838 participants
  Low

Summary of findings table ‐ Rehabilitation‐related activity interventions vs usual care with or without sham interventions

• Exercise for acutely hospitalised older medical patients 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 975 participants
  GRADE not reported

Implementation interventions vs no intervention

It is very uncertain whether implementation interventions changes quality of care: healthcare professional adherence to EBP at 12 months compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

• Implementation interventions to promote the uptake of evidence‐based practices in stroke rehabilitation 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.19 [0.53, 2.64]
  2 studies · 1455 participants
  Very low

Implementation interventions vs no intervention

Implementation interventions showed no clear difference in patient adherence to recommended treatment: number of outdoor… compared with no intervention (low certainty).

• Implementation interventions to promote the uptake of evidence‐based practices in stroke rehabilitation 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  MD 0.5
  1 study · 100 participants
  Low

Implementation interventions vs no intervention

Implementation interventions showed no clear difference in patient health status: HRQoL (EQ‐5D: –0.59 to 1, higher score… compared with no intervention (moderate certainty).

• Implementation interventions to promote the uptake of evidence‐based practices in stroke rehabilitation 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  MD 0.01
  2 studies · 1242 participants
  Moderate

Implementation interventions vs no intervention

Implementation interventions showed no clear difference in patient health status: ADL (Barthel Index, 0–20, higher score =… compared with no intervention (moderate certainty).

• Implementation interventions to promote the uptake of evidence‐based practices in stroke rehabilitation 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  MD 0.29
  2 studies · 1272 participants
  Moderate

Implementation interventions vs no intervention

Implementation interventions showed no clear difference in patient health status: psychological well‐being (GHQ‐12, 0–36,… compared with no intervention (low certainty).

• Implementation interventions to promote the uptake of evidence‐based practices in stroke rehabilitation 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 1273 participants
  Low

Implementation interventions vs no intervention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Implementation interventions to promote the uptake of evidence‐based practices in stroke rehabilitation 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Psychological intervention with or without other rehabilitation vs control (usual care/other rehabilitation)

Psychological intervention with or without other rehabilitation showed no clear difference in total mortalityDeaths compared with control (usual care/other rehabilitation) (moderate certainty).

• Psychological interventions for coronary heart disease 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.9 [0.77, 1.05]
  23 studies · 7776 participants
  Moderate

Psychological intervention with or without other rehabilitation vs control (usual care/other rehabilitation)

Psychological intervention with or without other rehabilitation may leads to lower cardiac mortalityDeaths compared with control (usual care/other rehabilitation) (low certainty).

• Psychological interventions for coronary heart disease 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.79 [0.63, 0.98]
  11 studies · 4792 participants
  Low

Psychological intervention with or without other rehabilitation vs control (usual care/other rehabilitation)

Psychological intervention with or without other rehabilitation showed no clear difference in non‐fatal MI compared with control (usual care/other rehabilitation) (low certainty).

• Psychological interventions for coronary heart disease 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.82 [0.64, 1.05]
  13 studies · 7845 participants
  Low