What do systematic reviews say?

Enhanced educational intervention and structured follow‐up vs standard education

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Patient and lay carer education for preventing pressure ulceration in at‐risk populations 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Individualised pressure ulcer education and monthly structured telephone follow‐up vs standard pressure ulcer education and monthly mail or telephone follow‐up

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Patient and lay carer education for preventing pressure ulceration in at‐risk populations 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Individualised pressure ulcer education and monthly structured telephone follow‐up vs standard pressure ulcer education and monthly mail or telephone follow‐up

It is very uncertain whether individualised pressure ulcer education and monthly structured… changes proportion of participants developing a new ulcer (24 months) compared with standard pressure ulcer education and monthly mail or telephone… (very low certainty).

• Patient and lay carer education for preventing pressure ulceration in at‐risk populations 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.55 [0.23, 1.3]
  1 study · 31 participants
  Very low

Individualised pressure ulcer education and monthly structured telephone follow‐up vs standard pressure ulcer education and quarterly mail or telephone follow‐up,

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Patient and lay carer education for preventing pressure ulceration in at‐risk populations 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Individualised pressure ulcer education and monthly structured telephone follow‐up vs standard pressure ulcer education and quarterly mail or telephone follow‐up,

It is very uncertain whether individualised pressure ulcer education and monthly structured… changes proportion of participants developing a new ulcer (24 months) compared with standard pressure ulcer education and quarterly mail or telephone… (very low certainty).

• Patient and lay carer education for preventing pressure ulceration in at‐risk populations 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.33 [0.17, 0.67]
  1 study · 31 participants
  Very low

Education vs standard printed material

It is very uncertain whether education changes proportion of participants developing a new pressure (12 months) compared with standard printed material (very low certainty).

• Patient and lay carer education for preventing pressure ulceration in at‐risk populations 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 3.57 [0.78, 16.38]
  1 study · 105 participants
  Very low

Education vs standard printed material

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Patient and lay carer education for preventing pressure ulceration in at‐risk populations 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION vs usual care

• Psychoeducation for siblings of people with severe mental illness 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 9 participants
  Low

ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION vs usual care

• Psychoeducation for siblings of people with severe mental illness 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 9 participants
  Low

Technology‐mediated psychoeducation vs usual care

It is very uncertain whether technology‐mediated psychoeducation changes compliance/satisfaction: leaving the study early ‐ any reason compared with standard care intervention (very low certainty).

• Information and communication technology in patient education and support for people with schizophrenia 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.24 [0.81, 1.88]
  2 studies · 116 participants
  Very low

Technology‐mediated psychoeducation vs usual care

Technology‐mediated psychoeducation showed no clear difference in mental state: not improved ‐ short‐term BPRS compared with standard care intervention (low certainty).

• Information and communication technology in patient education and support for people with schizophrenia 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.75 [0.56, 1]
  1 study · 84 participants
  Low

Technology‐mediated psychoeducation vs usual care

Technology‐mediated psychoeducation showed no clear difference in global state: not improved ‐ short‐term GAF compared with standard care intervention (low certainty).

• Information and communication technology in patient education and support for people with schizophrenia 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.08 [0.82, 1.42]
  1 study · 84 participants
  Low

Technology‐mediated psychoeducation vs usual care

• Information and communication technology in patient education and support for people with schizophrenia 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies · 0 participants
  GRADE not reported

Technology‐mediated psychoeducation vs usual care

• Information and communication technology in patient education and support for people with schizophrenia 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies · 0 participants
  GRADE not reported

Technology‐mediated psychoeducation vs usual care

• Information and communication technology in patient education and support for people with schizophrenia 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies · 0 participants
  GRADE not reported

Technology‐mediated psychoeducation vs usual care

Technology‐mediated psychoeducation led to lower social support Social Network Interview compared with standard care intervention; GRADE not reported.

• Information and communication technology in patient education and support for people with schizophrenia 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.42 [0.04, 0.8]
  1 study · 60 participants
  GRADE not reported

Pressure ulcer prevention care bundle vs usual care

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Patient and lay carer education for preventing pressure ulceration in at‐risk populations 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Pressure ulcer prevention care bundle vs usual care

Pressure ulcer prevention care bundle showed no clear difference in proportion of participants developing a new ulcer (28 days) compared with standard care (low certainty).

• Patient and lay carer education for preventing pressure ulceration in at‐risk populations 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  HR 0.58 [0.25, 1.33]
  1 study · 1598 participants
  Low

ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION vs usual care

It is very uncertain whether ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION changes compliance: Not compliant with medication compared with STANDARD CARE (very low certainty).

• Psychoeducation for schizophrenia 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.48 [0.31, 0.75]
  3 studies · 282 participants
  Very low

ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION vs usual care

It is very uncertain whether ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION changes compliance: 2a. With compared with STANDARD CARE (very low certainty).

• Psychoeducation for schizophrenia 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.77 [0.48, 1.23]
  2 studies · 172 participants
  Very low